> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://ivn.us/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# 9/11's Legacy: How It Changed America's War, Culture, and Law
- URL: https://ivn.us/911-legacy-how-it-changed-america-war-culture-law/
- Published: 2017-09-18T19:25:26.000Z
- Updated: 2026-06-22T19:59:38.000Z
- Author: Kathryn Bullington
- Tags: News

On September 11th, the US remembers its fallen citizens, murdered in the worst terrorist attack since the Oklahoma City bombing.

In unison, they #neverforget the 3,000 people who were murdered that day. But, people have forgotten so much -- or have never known -- 16 years later, how 9/11 has effected US war, culture, and law.

US citizens did what its founder, Ben Franklin, warned never to do -- they exchanged freedom for security.

## **War**

9/11 was followed by an intense national campaign to [expand](http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/06/books/06book.html?ref=ivn.us) presidential military powers, in order to protect the US from terrorism.

The Iraq War, which started with an alarming pre-emptive [carpet bombing](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/shock-and-awe-throttles-iraq/?ref=ivn.us), under [false](http://www.newsweek.com/2015/05/29/dick-cheneys-biggest-lie-333097.html?ref=ivn.us) pretenses, was one of the immediate consequences.

Pre-emptive war is considered illegal under international law, but became a US strategy after 9/11, threatening other countries since, like [Iran](http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2017/january/28/pre-emptive-attack-iran-bill-active-in-us-house/?ref=ivn.us) and [North Korea](http://www.newsweek.com/us-north-korea-war-mcmaster-646942?ref=ivn.us).

The US was infamously willing to 'go it alone' in Iraq, [against](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/12/usa.iraq?ref=ivn.us) the international community. Today, echoes of US isolationism remain, with frequent challenges to the [UN](http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/06/27/united-nations-donald-trump-antonio-guterres-china-215315?ref=ivn.us) and [NATO](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/12/going-alone-not-option-nato-chief-jens-stoltenberg-donald-trump?ref=ivn.us) as legitimate factors in US policies.

After 9/11, the US used [torture](http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/world/us-practiced-torture-after-9-11-nonpartisan-review-concludes.html?ref=ivn.us), and unmanned [drones](http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/09/08/493004533/the-rise-of-the-drone-and-the-thorny-questions-that-have-followed?ref=ivn.us), under seemingly endless executive military power.

These tactics plague the US's image, and erode the nation's moral authority around the globe.

Collectively, changes in ways in which the US runs its war efforts after September 11th have greatly expanded executive powers to unilaterally and aggressively carry out its military agenda, under a constant impending threat of terrorism.

Civilian deaths in the US's wars on terror have ballooned to over 1 million, according to a [report](http://www.psr.org/assets/pdfs/body-count.pdf?ref=ivn.us) authored in partnership with Physicians for Social Responsibility, and show no [signs](https://www.thenation.com/article/trumps-policy-is-clear-civilian-casualties-dont-matter-in-the-war-on-terror/?ref=ivn.us) of stopping.

## **Laws**

Several post 9/11 laws have enabled the executive branch to not only target foreigners with overarching new powers, but also the American people.

Since 2001, laws authorized under the National Defense Authorization Act ([NDAA](https://verdict.justia.com/2011/12/21/the-national-defense-authorization-act-explained?ref=ivn.us)), specifically the Authorization for Use of Military Force ([AUMF](https://www.lawfareblog.com/senators-table-paul-amendment-2018-ndaa?ref=ivn.us)), have given the executive branch its expanded military powers to target anyone or anything it can connect to 'terrorism.'

[Subtitle D](https://verdict.justia.com/2011/12/21/the-national-defense-authorization-act-explained?ref=ivn.us) of the NDAA allows for indefinite detention of US citizens suspected of connections with terrorism, without due process.

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 ([US Patriot Act](https://ivn.us/2015/05/29/courts-civil-liberty-groups-agree-congress-must-reform-patriot-act/)), passed with remarkable speed after 9/11\. It gave the executive branch its confidence to use [broad powers](https://ivn.us/2015/02/19/civil-rights-groups-fight-nsa-spying/) to interpret who or what might be [labeled](https://www.thenation.com/article/student-privacy-and-patriot-act/?ref=ivn.us) a 'terrorist,' foreign or domestic.

The Patriot Act is aided by the [FISA Amendment Act](https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/summary?ref=ivn.us) of 2008, which gave immunity to companies that comply with government requests for the people's information.

[The USA Freedom Act](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/questions-answers-newly-approved-usa-freedom-act/?ref=ivn.us), passed in 2015, reined in some of the abuses, but there is still a long way to go to restore legal integrity of US citizens' constitutional rights, according to civil liberty groups like the [EFF](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/05/usa-freedom-act-passes-what-we-celebrate-what-we-mourn-and-where-we-go-here?ref=ivn.us) and [ACLU](https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/whats-next-surveillance-reform-after-usa-freedom-act?ref=ivn.us).

Laws enacted as emergency responses to 9/11 have significantly eroded First and Fourth Amendment rights to free speech, freedom of association, privacy, and due process.

## **Culture**

None of these changes could have taken place without a significant change in culture.

Fear was not just a natural phenomenon, as a response to the unimaginable sight of the Twin Towers cascading in free fall in the middle of New York City. It was sustained by the Bush Administration, which [vilified dissent](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/silencing-voices-of-dissent/?ref=ivn.us), reminded US citizens of their insecurity [daily](http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32501273/ns/us%5Fnews-security/t/ridge-says-he-was-pressured-raise-terror-alert/?ref=ivn.us), and instituted a [super-patriotism](https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-1952663261/terrorism-and-super-patriotism?ref=ivn.us) that pulses through America still.

"If you're not with us, you're against us" became America's new slogan. It did not only apply to foreigners, it applied to [anyone who criticized](http://tech.mit.edu/V121/N50/col50gregd.50c.html?ref=ivn.us) the Bush administration, and specifically, the War on Terror.

Those who criticized the Bush administration were increasing called 'un-American' and 'with the terrorists,' climaxing in [Michele Bachmann's](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bachmann-calls-for-penetrating-expose-on-anti-americans-in-congress/?ref=ivn.us) calls, in 2008, for an inquiry into 'liberal' Congress members who might hold 'un-American' views.

If you were politically aware around 2001, you might remember American flags everywhere, from the new Fox News [logo](http://www.philly.com/philly/obituaries/roger-ailes-architect-of-conservative-tv-juggernaut-fox-is-dead-at-77-20170518.html?ref=ivn.us), to its ubiquitous use in [advertising](http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/26/business/media-business-advertising-patriotic-themes-reappear-but-with-more-subtlety-than.html?ref=ivn.us). It was the visual precursor to the chants of "USA! USA!" we hear in populist crowds all over the country.

[Muslims](http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/islamophobia-why-muslims-experience-greatest-economic-disadvantage-1008062151?ref=ivn.us) have taken the brunt of abuses from overarching government authority; and shifting cultural views of what it means to be American, and who the 'enemy' is.

Widespread acceptance of Islamaphobia made it easy to target others -- liberals, [Black Lives Matter](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-responds-to-petition-to-label-black-lives-matter-a-terror-group/?ref=ivn.us), [immigrants](http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-joe-arpaio-20170826-story.html?ref=ivn.us), and yes, this game has circled back to target [conservatives](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/magazine/how-un-american-became-the-political-insult-of-the-moment.html?ref=ivn.us).

It's no wonder that Americans of all sorts feel threatened, and need protection against some 'enemy.'

But, who is the 'enemy'? Islamic terrorists who "[hate freedom,](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bushaddress%5F092001.html?ref=ivn.us)" or fellow citizens [willing to sacrifice](https://hub.wsu.edu/law-justice-realtime/2015/12/17/islamophobia-the-stereotyping-and-prejudice-towards-muslims-since-911/?ref=ivn.us) each other's freedoms for "protection"?

Whose freedoms are being sacrificed? Protection against what? The answers are not clear.

## **A Nation of Fear**

Immediately after 9/11, 60% of Americans in a [Pew Research poll](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/19/americans-feel-the-tensions-between-privacy-and-security-concerns/?ref=ivn.us) were OK with trading civil liberties for security, under the threat of terrorism. That number bounces up and down depending on how fearful the public is:

[![Public's shifting concerns on security and civil liberties](https://storage.ghost.io/c/dc/be/dcbe1ac4-146f-43be-92a6-ea84728d86a6/content/images/2026/02/FT_16.02.09_concerns_security2.jpg)](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/19/americans-feel-the-tensions-between-privacy-and-security-concerns/ft%5F16-02-09%5Fconcerns%5Fsecurity2/?ref=ivn.us)

America has been a culture of fear since 9/11\. In such a whirlwind -- trying to protect itself against an always imminent, un-American terror -- that delineating 'who is *us* and who is *them,'* and 'what is *American,*' has proved illusive.

If you question how we got here, answers can be found by reflecting on how September 11, 2001 changed US war, laws, and culture.