logo

Blackmail, Unmasking, and Partisan Politics: The Flynn Case Continues on Capitol Hill

image
Author: Jeff Powers
Created: 09 May, 2017
Updated: 21 November, 2022
2 min read

As expected, this hearing was sharply divided among political lines.

There were certainly a few moments and takeaways that stood out from the Capitol Hill testimony of Sally Yates and James Clapper concerning Russian influence in the November election.

  • Sally Yates made the point, and an effective one, that due to his relationships with Russian officials, Michael Flynn was susceptible to blackmail from the Russians. During her testimony, Yates said she warned the White House about Flynn in two meetings with White House Counsel Don McGahn. Michael Flynn was dismissed some 18 days later.
  • An “independent investigation” of this issue will likely be proffered and used as a political weapon for Democrats. The goal is to make this a campaign issue for 2018 and 2020 -- much like Rep. Darrell Issa made investigations his priority during the Obama administration.
  • Senator Chuck Grassley asked James Clapper and Yates if either of them viewed classified documents where Mr. Trump, his associates, and members of Congress had been unmasked. They each replied Yes, but said they didn’t share that information with the media.
  • There was no confirmation of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian associates and there has not been any evidence that Russia changed a vote on election day.
  • Lindsey Graham pressed Mr. Clapper and Sally Yates about who unmasked Michael Flynn to the Washington Post, perhaps paving the way for a Susan Rice subpoena.
  • Senator Ted Cruz sparred with Yates over her decision to defy President Trump’s immigration executive order that led to her firing. Yates stated the order was “unconstitutional” and could not in good conscience send her attorneys into a courtroom to defend the order.

Where do we go from here? Likely the announcement of an “independent investigation” is coming. We will also likely hear the push for Susan Rice to testify before a congressional or senatorial committee regarding the unmasking of Trump associates and surveillance issues. Senator Lindsey Graham also noted that there will be a classified meeting between the committee members and at least Yates and Clapper, where questions that were not answered in this hearing, will be answered behind closed doors.

Photo Credit: REUTERS/AARON P. BERNSTEIN

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read