logo

Media's Negligence on Iran Nuclear Deal May Sway Senate Vote

image
Created: 24 August, 2015
Updated: 16 October, 2022
2 min read

A vote on the Iran nuclear deal is approaching and an erroneous report rerun in many media outlets could influence the vote.

Reported last Wednesday as an Associated Press exclusive, George Jahn wrote that a secret document revealed that as part of a side deal, Iran will inspect its own facilities at Parchin, a conventional military base formerly used for nuclear activity.

The story was sensational because it created the impression that based on a side deal with the U.S., separate from the P5+1 negotiations, Iranians would inspect their own facility. This included testing samples for evidence of nuclear activity on behalf of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with no outside observers.

Many in the media picked up on the story.

The Boston Herald reported that the document cited by the AP "proves beyond a doubt that the Obama administration and Secretary of State John Kerry have lied consistently about the nature of the 'side' agreements."

Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin wrote, "Obama frankly wanted a document so badly he literally did not care what was in it, or at least what was in the critical side deal. The deal is an utter farce."

The Wall Street Journal, calling Parchin the "suspected . . . home of Iran's nuclear-weapons and ballistic-missile development," charged that "the country that lied for years about its nuclear weapons program will now be trusted to come clean about those lies."

Then, without mentioning it had been done, the AP edited Jahn's original story and paragraphs detailing the Iranians' methods of alleged self-inspection were removed. A tweet from Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey includes a screenshot of the original story:

https://twitter.com/ArmsControlWonk/status/634096807413481477

IVP Existence Banner

The IAEA director general on Thursday called the original AP report a misrepresentation of the agency's verification process. In an annotated version of the draft of the agreement used by the AP, a former official from the IAEA reasoned the exclusive a forgery based on inaccuracies in standard legal language and an unfamiliarity with IAEA procedures.

This is not the first time Jahn's reporting on Iran's nuclear program has been questioned. Three years ago, Jahn published a story for the AP about a graph purportedly proving Iran was building nuclear weapons. When the graph was released, there was no date or source for the document. When translated, the Persian writing on it was determined to have said nothing about nuclear weapons.

While the AP Iran self-inspection story in its original form spread to many media channels, reports of the revised version have received little press. It is unclear whether this report could affect the upcoming Senate vote on the nuclear deal.

Early reports indicate there are enough votes in favor of the agreement. As the vote approaches, however, news consumers may need to be skeptical about reported claims where traditional media recently failed.

Photo Source: Al Jazeera America

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read