logo

Lack of Presidential Leadership Leads to Ineffective Governance

image
Author: Doug Goodman
Created: 31 January, 2014
Updated: 14 October, 2022
3 min read
For any organization to be effective and efficient, to successfully do what those funding its existence expect it to do in return for their investment, takes a strong leader. This person must be able to guide the organization, earning the trust and respect of both supporters and detractors, and foster decisions and actions that further the betterment of the organization, its investors, and its customers. Without this, the organization fails.

Since 1981, the first year of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, there have been 17 congressional sessions. Except for the first six years of Bush II and first two years of President Obama, presidents have been faced with a split Congress or a Congress completely controlled by the opposing party. In spite of this, all were able to either advance their policies or agree to policies put forth by the opposition that both the president and members of Congress believed were best for the country -- all except President Obama and the 112th and 113th Congress.

The House and Senate consider legislation either by bill or joint resolution. Joint resolutions, for the most part, are less contentious and usually deal with naming buildings, approving commemorative coins, or naming a day in honor of some event. Many times, they are passed on voice vote. Bills are usually passed by roll call vote, but roll calls are also used for quorum calls and other administrative actions. So how can one really get a handle on how well Congress is doing and how the president’s leadership impacts the legislative process?

The best indicator I believe is the number of bills signed by the president into public law. Remember, going back to 1981, there have been very few instances where Congress and the White House were controlled by the same party.

 

Ronald Reagan (97th – 100th Congress) 1607 bills signed; Average 402 per session

George H.W. Bush (101st – 102nd Congress) 835 bills signed; Average 418 per session

Bill Clinton (103rd – 106th Congress) 1566 bills signed; Average 392 per session

George W. Bush (107th – 110th Congress) 1720 bills signed; Average 430 per session *

Total 5728 bills signed; Average 409 bills per session

IVP Existence Banner

*6 years Republican control of Congress and White House

 

Barack Obama (111th – 114th Congress) has signed 710 bills, an average of 284 per session or 31% less than the average of the four presidents who preceded him. This in spite of the fact that during the 111th Congress, the Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, briefly with a veto-proof majority.

The reason for this difference, at least to me, is clear: LEADERSHIP.

It takes more than a good speech or a rare one or two hour conversation over lunch or dinner. It’s fine to delegate but in doing so, there has to be a willingness to follow-up and if necessary, roll up your sleeves and get directly involved. Above all, threats of unilateral action -- a “my way or the highway” approach -- will never work.

This president appears not to comprehend this. His style seems to be hands-off; his directive is all that is needed. Meetings with advisories seem at a minimum. And, his threat of using executive orders within the first couple of minutes of this year’s State of the Union address only reinforces the perception of poor leadership. The numbers I listed above validate this perception.

Photo Credit: Official White House Photo

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read