Reduce Extreme Partisanship With Nonpartisan Open Primaries

For years, extremists controlled the debate in the capitol. Elected representatives, gerrymandered into districts dominated by their party, were pressed to adopt ever more extreme positions in fear of a primary. Republicans were especially vulnerable, and started to use arcane legislative rules to block, harass, and confound the majority Democrats, ultimately leading to a serious crisis in governance as huge debts yawned and money ran out. Sound familiar? But this isn’t a description of Congress — it’s California, only a few years ago.

But California now is much different. A state that was once called “ungovernable” has now begun addressing many of the pressing issues other states and the federal government face, from pension reform to immigration reform. There’s no more talk of intractable gridlock in Sacramento, and the idea of California as the poster child for the failed liberal state has largely faded away.

California did it by implementing several successful, common-sense election reforms. First, they got rid of the divisive, low-turnout, closed-party primary that was responsible for so much of the gridlock in the state legislature. In its place, they adopted the kind of innovation that many strong and well-functioning democracies in other parts of the world have embraced; the top-two open primary. Basically they turned what had been a partisan, party-only bonanza for extremists into a two-round election in which everyone participates, and the top two vote-getters in the first round move on to the second.

Finish Reading

at Connecticut News Junkie

Continue