Online Voting Systems Must Consider Familiarity to Voters
By Matt Metzner on 10/15/2012 in internet election, internet voting, online election, online voting system, Utah with 5 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 3 minutes
Credit: Netexpert.co.za
Accessibility is paramount in establishing an online voting system. Next to accessibility, familiarity, and consequentially ease of use, are two of the most important factors to be considered when crafting the system. A new online voting system where the interface is substantially different than traditional methods could confuse voters or dissuade them from participating. The intention of an online voting system is increasing the ability to participate, crafting a system that creates a new barrier, instead of an opportunity, would be counter-productive.
Several online voting systems that have been reviewed in this column implemented familiar styles of ballots in their internet voting system. The system that Utah has put in place creates an opportunity for voters to participate on new platforms using familiar methods. In Utah’s internet voting process, deployed military members can log in from a remote military base and are presented with a ballot that looks identical to a ballot they would use at home. The troops using this system have two familiar methods interlacing to increase their ability to participate, and making the process as simple as possible.
Aside from ease of use, new electoral systems have faced obstacles in courts when they have the potential to confuse voters. By maintaining existing forms in an electronic format, or creating electronic ballots that mimic ballots at polling places, opponents would face an uphill battle when challenging online elections.
Minimizing voter confusion also serves democratic principles as it will allow more voters to participate while being fully informed on the issues they are voting for. Creating electronic ballots that could mislead a new voter or a voter averse to new technology is a sophisticated problem that should be left to the Secretary of States and to online ballot developers. Assuming that paper ballots are the ideal ballot, mimicking them online is the most favorable option for electronic voting proponents.




Leave Your Comment →
5 Comments
Jane Susskind
10.15.2012
@jsusskind
To avoid confusion, the Secretary of State could provide a sample online ballot online and send it to voters email. The internet has a lot of tools that could help increase familiarity.
Lucas Eaves
10.15.2012
@lucaseaves
Voting online would be such a big change already that I totally agree that it needs to look as much as possible like the usual voting system.
Terri Harel
10.15.2012
@tlharel
I think that online voting is an interesting idea, and it definitely increases accessibility to voting but aren’t there a lot of security concerns? Would hacking be a serious threat to online voters?
Dr. William J. Kelleher
10.15.2012
@DrWJK
Terri – check out past posts by me and Matt. You’ll see that security threats can be dealth with by Internet voting systems that have been professionally built (the one in DC was built by beginners, not pros)
Dr. William J. Kelleher
10.15.2012
@DrWJK
You are right. Designing ballots is an art form – inept designs can cause havoc. Look what happened in Florida in 2000 – voters thought they were voting for Gore, but actually voted for Buchanan by mistake!