Who is RT America? Host of the 2nd Free and Equal Debate
By Lucas Eaves on 11/03/2012 in gary johnson, Jill Stein, RT with 4 CommentsRead Time: 4 - 6 minutes
On November 5th, Gary Johnson and Jill Stein will participate in the second Free and Equal debate in the Washington studio of RT America. Their participation begs the question, who is RT America?
RT is the re-branded name of Russia Today, a state-funded multilingual Russian-based television channel. Russia Today was created in 2005 by the Kremlin as a soft power tool to improve Russia’s image in the world as well as fight the anti-Russian biases the Kremlin saw in the western media.
Creating a state-run media source is not unique, the last decade saw the creation of a number of “counter-hegemonic” 24-hour news channels offering a different vision of news from that of the established media giants such as CNN and BBC News. The most famous example has been the creation of Al-Jazeera by the Qatari government. There are also other examples such as France-24 created by France, Telesur by Latin American countries, Deutsche Welle by Germany.
Russia Today was, at first, concentrated on covering events in Russia and international events involving Russia, such as the war in Georgia in 2008. The coverage of the war expanded Russia Today’s viewership greatly. Russia Today has been growing further with the creation of RT in Arabic in 2007, RT in Spanish in 2009, and RT America in 2010. RT America focuses on American news stories.
Russia Today is accessible to 430 million people in more than 100 countries. In the United States, RT can be watched by 50 million people and is ranked second most popular foreign news channel after BBC News. This popularity is a sign that the editorial shift in which less anti-American content was working, in accordance with the election of President Obama and the warming of US-Russian relations. The editorial shift also corresponds with the re-branding from Russia Today to RT.
RT’s philosophy is to bring issues sidelined or distorted by the American mainstream media to the attention of their readers. Their will to challenge widespread and unchallenged positions is very well illustrated by their controversial ad campaign “Question More.”
RT has invited many observers and “experts,” that have not received air-time on mainstream channels including anarchists, anti-globalist, and leaders of left wings organization, to speak on air. In 2012, they broadcasted World Tomorrow, a series of interviews hosted by Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks. Among the people interviewed were Hassan Nasrallah, leader of the Hezbollah, the President of Ecuador, world famous hackers, and Guantanamo prisoners.
Following the same goal of giving a voice to usually ignored individuals, RT has given large and favorable coverage of the Ron Paul campaign in the Republican primary with articles like: ‘Ron Paul: “Last Man Standing for Lost Liberties‘ or ‘Corporatocracy: Ron Paul Says “US Slipping into Fascism.’ It is only logical that RT will host the last debate of this 2012 election between Gary Johnson and Jill Stein on November 5th.
RT remains a controversial source of information. They have been criticized for their tendency of choosing inflammatory topics, such as the 9/11 conspiracy to gain viewership. RT has also been seen as biased by a number of observers, especially regarding its coverage of events happening in Russia; the trial of oligarch Mikhaïl Khodorkovski is an example.
The reasons behind the important coverage of third party candidates and outsiders by RT are not extremely clear. It is obvious that having candidates openly criticizing the current American policies is appreciated in Moscow, especially regarding foreign policy.
RT will be giving third party candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein’s debate a potential audience of 50 million people. American citizens might distrust a Russian-based news channel but RT is giving them an opportunity to hear two candidates discuss issues that have been left out by the Democratic and Republican candidates. This is more than what most of the American mainstream media is offering.







Leave Your Comment →
4 Comments
Alex Gauthier
11.03.2012
@alexg
state-run media has a tough time with credibility, seeing as their bills are paid by… the state
W. E. Messamore
11.03.2012
@W__E__Messamore
Are we not living in a strange world? American citizens are getting information about things from Russian state-owned media that are being suppressed by most of their own “free,” private, and “independent” media. The problem is a slavish sycophancy among media elites toward the power structures and powerful individuals whom they admire. The problem is not a new one. Noam Chomsky identified it explicitly and criticized it articulately during the Vietnam conflict– and his critique extended beyond the media to include all American “intellectuals.” The solution lies with you. The establishmentarian media derives its power from the attention of its audience and the influence and advertising dollars that can be squeezed out of that attention. Reward good journalism, challenging questions, alternative perspectives (when they have merit!), and vigilant review of establishmentarian malfeasance with your attention and by drawing attention to it from the people you know by sharing the word. To put it as succinctly as Noam Chomsky would– a good start would be to turn off your TV.
W. E. Messamore
11.03.2012
@W__E__Messamore
The comparison in one of the RT ads above between the US and Iranian presidents with the caption, “Who poses the greater nuclear threat?” may seem absurd or even offensive to most Americans, but to consider a non-Western point of view, it may also seem absurd or even offensive to many people in the world that Washington has presumed to be a world policeman for nuclear proliferation when Washington is the only government in history to have ever used a nuclear weapon on another country. This American finds it a bit odd too.
Michael Higham
11.03.2012
@michaelhigham
I can see why Russian media would have a vested interest in a third-party candidate, especially Libertarians. Less coercive involvement on the international level would be beneficial to a nation like Russia.