The Number of Non Religious People in the US is on the Rise
By Lucas Eaves on 10/10/2012 with 31 CommentsRead Time: 3 - 5 minutes
A survey released by the Pew Institute on Tuesday shows that the number of nonreligious people in the US is on the rise, reaching a record high of 20 percent. However, this trend has yet to be reflected in the political arena.
Today, 1 out of 5 Americans (1 out of 3 for those under 30), consider themselves to be non-religiously affiliated. The number of people not affiliated to any religion is growing more rapidly than any other religious group. The US has long been more religious than the rest of the developed world, but is now joining a global trend in which 23% of the world population is considered non religious. This growth remains slow, however, for atheists and agnostics, which is a nonreligious affiliation many Americans still find difficult to wear. Only 6% of people in the US claim to be atheist or agnostic, which is far from the 13% world average.
If the absence of religiosity is more and more accepted in everyday life, this evolution has not yet been translated in the American political arena. Indeed, in the last session, no member of the Congress declared themselves as atheist, or even non affiliated. Only two high level elected officials have ever openly spoken about being non-theists: Congressman Peter Stark from California and State Senator Ernie Chambers from Nebraska, famous for his legal case against God. In contrast, many developed countries have had non believers as head of government such as current Australian Prime Minister Julia Guillard, Great Britain Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, or Norway’s Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.
A few facts can help illustrate why being a non-theist remains a taboo if you are running for office in the US. In 2007, a Gallup poll showed that voting for an atheist would be the last option chosen by American voters, after voting for a homosexual, a 72 year-old, or someone married three times. Being atheist is the only category that received more vote-against than for.
Credit: http://www.gallup.com/poll/26611/some-americans-reluctant-vote-mormon-72yearold-presidential-candidates.aspx#1
Another survey in 2011 showed that 53% of Americans think that a belief in God is directly linked to morality. Finally, the two most famous political “atheist” figures in a lot of American minds are Hitler and Stalin, not the best example of someone you would vote for. With this in mind, it is understandable that nobody in the current election is running under the banner of godlessness.
It will certainly take time for the religious environment in the US to change enough to have an openly atheist elected official, but with non-religiously affiliated people making up 20% of the electorate we can hope that more representation for that group will be seen in the near future.







Leave Your Comment →
31 Comments
Benjamin Foster
10.10.2012
@befoster87
Fascinating piece, Lucas. The prominence of religious rhetoric in the US leaves me with little hope of change in the near future. Nearly every speech by President Obama is concluded with, “God Bless America.” In addition, after President Obama failed to say Merry Christmas in a weekly address, political pundits declared a “War on Christmas.” Until a prominent political leader can convince the american public that religion isn’t the only path to morality, an alternative will cease to exist.
Chad Peace
10.10.2012
@Chad_Peace
Agreed. The I think the religious and partisan institutions are facing the same problem. In the old days, messenger was king. Those who delivered the messages had all the power. Today, there are so many modes of delivering messages, the parties and the religious institutions can’t rely on the scarcity of bandwidth to make sure theirs wins.
Michael Higham
10.10.2012
@michaelhigham
I seriously do not understand the hostility toward Atheism. I cannot comprehend why so many would say they do not trust Atheists, or non-religious people. I do not see the connection between morality and religiosity. I’m glad to see that some non-religious public figures are finding success. Religious affiliation does not matter, content of one’s character does matter.
I’m lucky to have grown up in Southern California where different social/religious beliefs are much more accepted. I do believe the prejudice will go away over time in the country and as the number of non-religious people grows.
Jule
10.10.2012
Change will sadly be a long time coming i think. People hold very strongly to their beliefs, and if the continued societal segregation of blacks and whites is still going on today in the south… Maybe the rest of the country will manage to leave the middle ages, but i fear the bible belt will remain a scary place for non-religious, and the politicians will remain firmly devoted to god. Whether they believe or not.
David Wynn Smith
10.10.2012
Sad! One day they will know!!!
Rob Joyce
10.10.2012
I can think of nothing better for this country.
Dave Rossow
10.10.2012
I would vote for someone specifically because they were non-religious. Keep religion out of government!
Leo Zicc
10.10.2012
for the love of god, dont talk about there being no god, why, its ungodlike and just plain unhealthy to not believe in fantasy
Jennifer A Hughes
10.10.2012
plenty of people claim to be religious for political purposes…I’m not saying that most of the Congress are lying about this but it is not unheard of! I try to judge a person by their “fruit” and I see very little of it in the Congress.
Beth Poudrier Forbush
10.10.2012
No
Mary Hansard
10.10.2012
Yes…………….
Bonnie Sands Fackler
10.10.2012
The brainwashing of America by the progressives is working apparently ,, sadly….
David Wynn Smith
10.10.2012
This Country was built & Founded on Christian Principles & Values!!! Remove them and you will have a dictatorship or at best a Monarchy like Obamad is working for!!!
Tim Masters
10.10.2012
if that person was a Constitutional Libertarian I would
Kacy Sample
10.10.2012
Absolutely! A person’s religion has nothing to do with my decision to vote for them. Their record on Constitutional legislation is what I care about.
Marisa Evans
10.10.2012
Yes.
Brittany Prichard
10.10.2012
I would. Why should one’s religious beliefs define how good of a politician they are? I am very spiritual, religious even. But I feel as though no religon should be forced upon the people, even if you feel like you are 100% right. So why should it matter if a politician wasn’t?
In fact, I almost think it would be better if the politicians were not. That way they can focus on doing good for the people because it would be what is best for them…instead of making their personal beliefs law.
Brittany Prichard
10.10.2012
I would. Why should one’s religious beliefs define how good of a politician they are? I am very spiritual, religious even. But I feel as though no religon should be forced upon the people, even if you feel like you are 100% right. So why should it matter if a politician wasn’t?
In fact, I almost think it would be better if the politicians were not. That way they can focus on doing good for the people because it would be what is best for them…instead of making their personal beliefs law.
Ryan Mclain
10.10.2012
This isn’t so much a sign of atheism growing as it is a sign of frustration with organized religion.
Brenda Garner
10.10.2012
NO!
Jason Theodoroff
10.10.2012
Yes!!!
Ryan Taylor
10.10.2012
way before I’d vote for one who is
Michael Snider
10.10.2012
I would prefer to vote for an atheist or a nonbeliever.
Joe Lanza
10.10.2012
I have no problem voting for an atheist. We’re supposed to have separation of Church and State, so it shouldnt matter anyway. Also, we already have many politicians who are “closet atheists”…they SAY they believe because they know they have to in a nation where most people do, otherwise many people wouldnt vote for them.
Richard Griffin
10.10.2012
Thank God.
David Haney
10.10.2012
Absolutely!! Religion in my mind has nothing to do with it….
Kristie Bittleston
10.10.2012
If I agreed with their platform. Candidates are free to worship whom they wish – if they wish, just as all Americans should be.. If they support liberty and freedom under our Constitution, I would definitely consider them for my vote.
Brittany Prichard
10.10.2012
I think it’s sad that people wouldn’t vote for someone who is non-theist. Religion shouldn’t define who a person is. Being religious does NOT make anyone superior.
Blake Bunch
10.10.2012
@blakebunch
Truly a sad state of affairs indeed when a majority of Americans still cannot separate church and state…. Beliefs are abstract, and unique to each individual. One could believe in giant spaghetti monsters, but have they ever eaten one? I think that religious ideals have little, if any, correlation to political action.
Michael Mallon
10.10.2012
I’m agnostic. I have very little interest in the religious views of political candidates. But when they insist on talking about it, whether they are believers or otherwise, I dig deeper, and sometimes what I find is reason enough to dismiss them for hypocrisy.
Sandra Pipkin Dickson
10.10.2012
I might, if I felt they were going to be really good for the country. Give to Ceasar what is Ceasar’s and give to God what is God’s. One of the main reason we have America, is because we believe in freedom OF religion. I think that includes non-religious people! I am a Christian, but I accept all people. I try to follow the teaching of Jesus.