How To Be Non-Partisan Without Getting Your Throat Slit
By Loretta Breuning on 09/10/2012 with 8 CommentsRead Time: 3 - 5 minutes
Life throws me chances to practice being independent every day. Yesterday, I landed in the middle of a political conversation when I sat down to get my hair cut. The customer in the next chair was condemning big companies for causing obesity. Her haircutter agreed that businesses have malicious ways of getting us to overeat. The young lady with her hands in my hair chimed in exuberantly.
I don’t share their view, and I usually run the other way when people start blaming their problems on corporations. I was stuck there, alas, and part of me wanted to scream, “Can’t you take responsibility for what you put in your mouth!” Another part of me wanted to say nothing, because I knew this was a mammalian bonding ritual rather than a real discussion. When mammals unite against a common enemy, their brains release oxytocin, serotonin, and dopamine, which feels great. If I disrupted this in-group feeling, I would become the out-group and the herd would turn on me.
I weighed the risk of speaking up against the risk of stuffing my feelings, and settled on a polite way to participate in the discussion.
“I think we’re free to choose what we eat.”
My haircutter seethed in response. That didn’t surprise me. Here in Berkeley, you’re expected to agree when people say they’re oppressed. No dissent from “progressive” orthodoxy is tolerated. If you dare challenge someone’s claim to victimhood, you’re treated like an evil person who must be reformed. The coiffeuse sanctimoniously told me what I should read and watch and think about the food industry.
I already knew these scriptures, but I didn’t share her fundamentalist interpretation of them. I calmly explained, “I don’t see it as a wealth-and-poverty issue because unprocessed food costs less than processed food.”
She erupted into a full boil. Her hands shook as she declaimed on the price of broccoli. Since she was holding a sharp instrument near my throat, I did not feel protected by platitudes like “everyone has I right to their opinion” or “the customer is always right.” I stopped talking.
Being independent means knowing when to open up and when to shut up. It does not mean winning arguments. I don’t try to dominate arguements because the mammal brain perceives that as a survival threat. If I cede the dominant position to the other person, it allows them to absorb new information.
Everyone talks about equality and empathy, but we have inherited a brain that seeks dominance. In the state of nature, social dominance promotes survival. Natural selection produced a brain that seeks status and control. There are myriad ways to achieve this in your own mind. Moral superiority is one of them. If you fancy yourself a victim of oppression, you can feel superior to those you deem “oppressors.” You instantly belong to the herd that shares your sense of oppression. Your victim theory helps you feel safe and strong. To your mammal brain, threats to this theory feel like threats to your survival.
I do not expect to persuade people with facts. But if I let another person have the dominant position, I can plant a seed. Sometimes the new information takes root and they believe they thought of it themselves.
I am a mammal too, of course. My limbic brain knows that predators eat individuals who stray from the herd. It knows that dominants get the good reproductive opportunities. Accepting my mammal brain helps me manage it without being a self-righteous herd-follower.
After the haircut, I handed the young lady a tip. Suddenly, I noticed that she was a little chunky. This fit my theory that people project their personal frustrations onto the system. The political is personal (Gloria Steinem had it backwards). I wanted to tell her, “I would never judge a person for their weight. But I admit to judging a person for playing the victim.” I shut up instead. I reminded myself that she’s responsible for her mammal brain and I’m responsible for mine. I soothed my inner mammal with the thought that I had planted my seed for the day, and another opportunity would come tomorrow. It did.





Leave Your Comment →
8 Comments
Chelsea Perera
09.11.2012
@cmperera
so interesting… all you have to do is plant the seed and the risk of getting your throat slit decreases dramatically.
Loretta Breuning
09.12.2012
@lbreuning
Plant the seed and let it sprout while your throat is not under the blade!
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
09.11.2012
@cassidynb
I enjoyed your closing sentiment regarding “soothing your inner mammal” and your use of an evolutionary perspective to understand human behavior. While the ladies in the hair salon seemed to behave predictably as mammals, what is it that sets your behavior apart from their inclinations and instinctual interaction? There seems to be an important connection between a politically independent person and the potential of most homo sapiens to realize that their survival does not depend on sticking with the herd and the best reproductive opportunities.
Loretta Breuning
09.12.2012
@lbreuning
I’m not understanding your last line because in nature, animals stick with the best reproductive opportunities, and that’s the only thing that motivates them to break away from the herd. In humans it’s hard to untangle because we rarely perceive ourselves to be sticking with the herd or seeking reproductive opportunities. But the fact is, what gets a person to take a risk to do something different? Pretty often, it’s either to win romantic admiration or to enhance the survival prospects of your children. What does this have to do with being independent? Our minds unconsciously project the romantic / survival consequences of our political positions. Your mind build illusions about where your social alliances will lead.
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
09.18.2012
@cassidynb
I was trying to say that being politically independent may not be in a person’s best social interest, and comparably, people may not be controlled by their reproductive opportunities in the same way animals are, which is not in their biological best interest. I wasn’t necessarily arguing a point with this statement, just highlighting that there is an interesting connection in these two human abilities.
Dan Richards
09.12.2012
@danrich
“Everyone talks about equality and empathy, but we have inherited a brain that seeks dominance. In the state of nature, social dominance promotes survival. Natural selection produced a brain that seeks status and control.”
I have seen this a lot as well, but I disagree with this perception in that they want a dominate role. Most of these people are followers, and gave up the Dominate stance to be lead by a “all caring nanny governorship”, even if they claim they are a leader of some kind, they are not. They are more cattle-like in their following trends in that they take no responsibility that they are not told to take.
“If I cede the dominant position to the other person, it allows them to absorb new information.”
I have found that ceding does not allow them a chance to absorb, but it does keep them from going fanatical on you and protects you from their rage. It is not ceding dominance, but ceding a fight with a person of a ‘minion’ mentality that could become physically violent to people of a different view.
Loretta Breuning
09.12.2012
@lbreuning
I know what you mean about cattle (see my last post on herd behavior). But dominance is a separate motivation. (The former is oxytocin and the latter is serotonin- see my meetyourhappychemicals.com.) A person can be a herd-follower and seek dominance at the same time. Everyone does. You imagine that your dominance will rise if you follow one herd as opposed to the other.
I know what you mean that an enraged person is not in “absorbing” mode. But I like to think that once you step aside to avoid confrontation, the idea that you’ve planted is still in their mind. It may trouble them because of cognitive dissonance, but they can’t blame that frustration on you if you’re gone.
Julie Burlington
09.13.2012
@jburlington
“Self-righteous herd-follower” is a good description for so many Americans who are stuck in a “heard” mentality with entitlement attitudes. People are only insulting their own intelligence by blaming large companies for their own life style and nutritional choices. It’s unfortunate that in a town like Berkeley, that it’s unsafe to even “plant the seed” of an opposing opinion.