Religion and Political Parties are Suffering from the Same Problem
By Chad Peace on 10/06/2012 in Alan Miller, CNN, Institutions, political parties, religion with 24 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 4 minutes
Alan Miller, Director of The New York Salon, wrote an article for CNN where he described spirituality among today’s youth as a “cop-out.” “Take a side,” he says, with a stroke of over generalization and condescension for the younger generation. His view is no different than most partisan political consultants who generalize “independent voters” as being in the “middle” of everyone else and “uninformed” of the issues. The assumptions made by institutionalized religion and political parties see two sides: “Left and Right” or “Theism and Atheism.”
The “middle of the road” that Miller describes as spirituality seems to be an “agnosticism” that refuses to accept human inspiration:
Spiritual but not religious people are especially prevalent in the younger population in the United States, although a recent study has argued that it is not so much that people have stopped believing in God, but rather have drifted from formal institutions.
It seems that just being a part of a religious institution is nowadays associated negatively, with everything from the Religious Right to child abuse, back to the Crusades and of course with terrorism today.
Theirs is a world of fence-sitting, not-knowingess, but not-trying-ness either. Take a stand, I say. Which one is it? A belief in God and Scripture or a commitment to the Enlightenment ideal of human-based knowledge, reason and action? Being spiritual but not religious avoids having to think too hard about having to decide.
It must be true that some people sit on the fence because they haven’t put the time in to decide which side to come down on. But it can’t be true that all agnostics refuse to think hard, or that independent minded “youngsters” are simply know-nothings or lazy. The answer is in Miller’s own observations. Our youth is weary of institutions, especially those that rely on negativity. Whether its the church telling us to condemn certain sinners or a political party that embraces an “us against them” philosophy, today’s youth can’t survive in such an antagonistic environment.
America’s youth has grown up in a more integrated society where our opinions are shared on sites like Facebook and Twitter. Where an overzealous commitment to religious and political institutions is not conducive to diversity of opinion.
As a consequence, the narrow constructs of a rigid belief system, whether religious or political, are fading. It’s not that our youth know nothing. It’s not because they aren’t trying. It’s because the fences we sit on see over the walls our institutions have built around us.





Leave Your Comment →
24 Comments
Rick London
10.06.2012
Well written but its a bit of a stretch. As an independent who was a GOP, and voting for Obama, I assure you the GOP and Dems are apples and oranges. The GOP has become a giant far right theocracy that will fall by the wayside like the Whigs and no-nothings, now interacting with Dems I find a big mix (all inclusive) of gays, wiccans, jews, christians, atheists, agnostics etc etc etc etc etc etc….not so with the GOP. The Dems MUCH more represent the melting pot of America…and it has NOT problem of people of no religion. Thanks.
Blaz Gutierrez
10.06.2012
@blazgutierrez
I don’t think you’re wrong about the GOP’s rightward shift. I think the point that the author is trying to make, however, is that the tactics used by both parties have kept many people from peering over those “walls.” The problem that the parties face now is that those walls have been built up so much that it becomes virtually impossible to ignore them. I’d wager that given the topic of “political theater” most Americans would have plenty to say, regardless of their party affiliation.
What we need to do is now is not turn away those people who dare to peer over, but encourage more to follow in their steps.
Chad Peace
10.06.2012
@Chad_Peace
Thanks Rick. I understand your observations. I was not trying to say that one party or another is more or less inclusive by saying they have both put up walls. Whether Dem or Repub, both parties have an “us v. them” mentality … meaning, even if “Democrats” are more inclusive, as you suggest, its the “Republicans are the problem and our enemy” attitude that makes it difficult do embrace their otherwise more inclusive tendencies.
Jane Susskind
10.06.2012
@jsusskind
This is a great article Chad. I think to categorize people who call themselves agnostic as “fence-sitting, not-knowingess, but not-trying-ness either” is completely wrong. I would identify as agnostic, and after spending four years studying politics and religion in college, I can say with confidence that it is not because I didn’t try and not because I don’t know. I think the confines of institutionalized religion leave no room for disagreement or diversity, the same issue with institutionalized parties and the two party system. In a world where “taking a stand” has come to mean excluding all those who disagree with you, maybe it’s best we don’t take a stand and actually take the time to understand all different viewpoints. But it’s hard to do that when you’ve locked yourself behind a fence.
Michael Higham
10.06.2012
@michaelhigham
I always felt like an independent-minded know-nothing youngster. I never though I knew enough to engage in a conversation with my partisan friends with made up minds. I was always in the middle of the dialogue, trying to fact check everything I thought that might be true. Partisans have made up their minds, they know what they believe, and they seem to know the outcome of their political beliefs. They’ll look at me and say, “how come you don’t know this? I thought you study politics?” I’m not lazy and I like to think I’m knowledgeable, but could it that politics is too complex for absolute truths?
However, I feel lucky to be living in Southern California where differing political and social beliefs are much more acceptable. In the end, my conservative friends can still coexist with my liberal friends and friends who don’t care at all. We’ll go out and have a beer and sing karaoke.
I’ve always said that politics is infinite. You can’t ever know everything and what appears to be the truth is circumstantial.
Martin Mcdowell
10.06.2012
Dangerous !! How long after we develop in my country a Christian Theology – before we are burning witches & Heretics ( those that refuse to conform ) at the stake … Judging by how easily people are lead in this country – NOT LONG … – PEACE not WAR
Angela Smith
10.06.2012
DOGMA, whether religious or political, discourages dissent, which is NECESSARY for the health of ANY organization.
Tom Terrell
10.06.2012
They are ultimately the same and you can through sports teams in there as well. All have devolved to a point that one can easily bring up talking points (factual or not) to support any given side. I think that those walls are growing taller and built up more solidly than before. What used to be a fence is now a wall akin to that between Palestine and Israel, patrolled just as heavily.
Bill Keaton
10.06.2012
Speaking of religion, it is easy for the author to paint a picture of black and white. One either believes in god, or does not. There really is little grey area. Politics, however, is a different story. There is black and white, and numerous shades of grey. A person can be a fiscal conservative, yet liberal on social issues….so in which party does that person belong?
Christopher Hood
10.06.2012
Religion and politics shouldnt appear together at all- this is a secular nation.
Bianca Ciotti
10.06.2012
@biancaciotti
This is a really interesting article! I’m surprised to hear that people perceive agnostics as indecisive “fence-sitters.” I find it ill advised to assume about someone else’s religious decisions, and much the same about their political affiliation.
Paul Yankowskas
10.07.2012
Religious institutions that engage in political practices should lose their tax-free status.
William Braman
10.07.2012
most people forget our country was found on christianity. took god out of school and its gone downhill ever since
Jason Harsha
10.07.2012
I have no use for either as they both want to tell me how to live.
Tomas Angela Zelaya
10.07.2012
My family came to the United States to leave a country where politics and religion were in bed. This was also true for our founding fathers hence the separation of church and state. Historically, freedom of religion has been most threatened when religious figures are also the political figures…. breeds too much corruption and narrows your ability to discover God on your own as it would be under the confines of how the state defines religion. More dangerous to the purity of the religion than the functionality of the government. By the way….most of the founding fathers were Masons which doesn’t have much to do with true Christianity, for those who vow the country was built on Christianity…. it wasn’t !
John Pierce
10.07.2012
Tomas you better go back and check because this country was based on Christianity using the scriptures as reference time after time
Chad Peace
10.07.2012
@Chad_Peace
Substantiation?
Christopher Davis-Garland
12.13.2012
@gdsirch
1797 Treaty of Tripoli submitted by Christian, founding father, and president John Adams, “The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”
Peggy Spencer Fitch Preece
10.07.2012
That is truth
Rick London
10.07.2012
Religion was included but not forced in the US Constitution. If this country was based on religious dogma, I’m surprised (since our founding fathers was running from it…not aware of that history John Pierce? Then why in heavens name did Thomas Jefferson spend all that time cutting all the miracles out of the New Testament and making sure every Congress member got it (until 1944 when it became optional). It’s because he was making very very sure no one religion ever ever again took ahold of our government. He felt, as do I, that the good book offers an ideal way of life, but once one starts “outmiracle-ing” another religion, what you’ve got is another theocracy, what our founding fathers escaped by the skin of their teeth. Don’t believe Jefferson re-wrote the Bible (without miracles) for our government?) It’s still available on Amazon. Simply type in “Jefferson Bible” in their search engine and learn the history of how he carefully edited out all miracles…with a razor blade!
William Braman
10.08.2012
there’s no miracles for god just another day at the office for the almighty
Lucas Eaves
10.08.2012
@lucaseaves
Great comparison. If true, their is hope for the future.
Zachery Abramson
10.09.2012
@zabramso
I can’t speak for my entire generation, but personally and among my friends I think there is a general lack of faith in institutions that claim to have absolution. I would characterize our position as existential as opposed to undecided and non-spiritual.
Victoria Rose Sherry
10.09.2012
We are moving into a new age and old systems will collapse-that is the reason for all this.