This Week’s Theme on IVN: Civility in News and Politics
By Chad Peace on 09/10/2012 in Civility, Internships, IVN, Mission with 4 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 3 minutes
The level of discourse in our country has undoubtedly dropped over the last few decades. Calling the opposition “un-American” or “liars” is common practice. And compromise has become a dirty word. In short, civility in news and politics has slowly eroded.
While divisions and divisiveness have always been a part of the political equation, there was a time when respectful disagreement and deference to cooperation were what defined the American government.
As we head into the final months of the general election, this week’s theme at IVN is civility in politics, news, and discourse.
IVN: Who We are and What We are Doing
The IVN website, still under heavy long-term construction, is designed to give readers a broader and more transparent access to news and information while significantly magnifying the reach of quality independent contributors. IVN is accomplishing this goal by creating a news and information platform that provides independent journalists, civic leaders, and even campaigns unfiltered access to the news cycle. This integrated approach generates wider search engine exposure and a broader reach to targeted audiences.

IVN’s reputation and credibility are preserved through its adherence to a published etiquette and editorial guideline. These guidelines ensure that both contributors and readers benefit from robust and diverse content in a civil environment.
IVN: Internship Opportunities
In an age when “journalism” has become increasingly subjective, IVN has developed an internship program to show students and recent graduates how to produce objective and fact-based journalism. As part of this program, IVN provides instruction on social media and search engine optimization so that these up-and-coming journalists are ready to contribute productively and effectively in modern news.
IVN: The Mission – Civility in News and Politics
The purpose of IVN.us is to provide unfiltered political news and policy analysis across the political spectrum. Unlike traditional media outlets and elsewhere in the “blogosphere” where the diversity of viewpoints is often reduced into partisan circles, IVN actively encourages contributors and readers of differing political tendencies to engage in a constructive dialogue. The mission of IVN.us is to raise the level of civil discourse to a place where solutions are more persuasive than talking points, and participation is not conditioned on your party affiliation.





Leave Your Comment →
4 Comments
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
09.11.2012
@cassidynb
Although I understand what you’re getting at by calling journalism either “subjective” or “objective”, I believe it’s time journalists move away from pigeonholing reality in this way. Every piece of writing is subjective; therefore in the uprising generation of journalists we should engender esteem for integrity and honesty rather than “objectivity”.
Chad Peace
09.12.2012
@Chad_Peace
Although I understand your literal attributions to the terms “subjective” and “objective,” the terms are being used in the journalistic, and no philosophic, sense. Under your interpretation, there is no such thing as “objective journalism.” Which you would be right. If we are talking philosophically. I would also argue that many of today’s journalist have integrity and honesty, but they let this philosophy engender their duty: to report.
William Boardman
09.15.2012
Excellent. Objective/subjective is a distraction, and some who argue about it know full well it’s just a distraction. Accuracy matters.
William Boardman
09.15.2012
“the last few decades” — that’s an illusion.
“un-American” was apparently first used in 1818.
Certainly HUAC — the House Unamerican Activities Committee”
was happy to smear people more than 60 years ago.
Contemporary discourse may be ugly, but that’s hardly new —
what may be more recent is the level of ignorance in that discourse,
and its lack of much historical sense, looking forward as well as back.
Only one party made compromise a dirty word.