Should 17-year-olds be Allowed to Vote?
By Jane Susskind on 07/24/2012 in electoral reform, Vote 17, Vote 17 Lowell, voting age with 9 CommentsRead Time: 2 - 4 minutes
A group of teenagers in Lowell, Massachusetts says yes. As their schools lose funding and programs face budget cuts, this group of teens is pushing for a bill to be passed to allow young voters to get a head start in the political process by voting in municipal elections starting at the age of 17.
Maybe they’re onto something, argues Peter Levine, the director of the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at Tufts University.
“It could be that 18 is quite a bad year to be the first year to be eligible to vote.”
At the ripe age of 18, young citizens are freshly transitioning into adulthood; graduating high school, enrolling in college, or starting their lives as adults, whatever that entails.
Voting is a civic habit, researchers argue, one that should be developed before adulthood. At the age of 17, however, teenagers are still influenced by their parents to adopt new habits and they are engrossed in their communities. Influencing factors in their lives encourage civic engagement and enforce the habit of community involvement. The youth group “Vote 17 Lowell” argues that community involvement should include voting.
There are arguments both in favor and against lowering the voting age, and this group is not calling for a Constitutional Amendment to change the voting age to 17 just yet. They are petitioning the state Legislature to approve the measure in hopes to test their hypothesis. The results would act as a model for lowering the voting age and allow other states to weigh the positive and negative effects before instating a similar measure.
The Wall Street Journal reported last week,
If ultimately approved, Lowell would become the first city in the country to give under-18 residents the right to vote in a regular municipal election, according to the National Youth Rights Association.
To distinguish the 17-year-old voters from adults, the Massachusetts secretary of state would describe them as “specially registered” minors. Their voting rights would extend to school committee and City Council; issues that directly influence their lives. Regional, state or national elections would still be reserved for legal adults of the age of 18 years or older.
The bill is called “Vote 17″ and the teens have created a Facebook and Twitter page to share their progress.
Take a look at their work, and let us know what you think. Should 17-year-olds be allowed to vote in municipal elections?





Leave Your Comment →
9 Comments
Chad Peace
07.24.2012
@Chad_Peace
We’ll see if they have the same enthusiasm in about a year.
Amos Cooper
07.24.2012
@adcooper12
One big problem I see with this is teenagers might not be interested in local politics.
Jane Susskind
07.24.2012
@jsusskind
If they are not interested in local politics, then they don’t have to vote. Just like adults. I think this is an interesting response to a problem they identified. They noticed that their school was facing budget cuts and it was directly affecting them. They aren’t asking to vote for President or even state offices…they are just asking to vote on issues that influence them specifically and uniquely.
Manuel Flores
07.24.2012
@mannyflores
Teenagers can be easily brainwashed. Many votes would not be represented correctly.
Jane Susskind
07.24.2012
@jsusskind
I think 17 year olds are just as likely to get “brainwashed” as adults who listen to mainstream media and political attack ads and take it as the truth. Voting is all about education, and I think that the 17 year olds who actually make the effort to register and get to the polls, are probably those 17 years olds who really truly care. The only issues they’d be voting for would be local issues…so worrying about a 17 year old being “brainwashed” into voting for a presidential candidate isn’t an issue. Because they are not legally adults and most teens don’t have to pay taxes etc, that election would be left for legal adults. This would just give them a say in their schools and community. I’m not necessary in support of the measure also, just think it’s an idea worth looking into.
Brad R. Schlesinger
07.25.2012
@bradschlesinger
I don’t really see too much to worry about here. What about this: for state wide (including local) elections, allow a state to tie their voting age to the driving age.
Craig D. Schlesinger
07.25.2012
@craigschlesinger
I’m in agreement with Brad here. It might actually help more people become more aware and engaged in the process.
Amanda Le
07.25.2012
@amandale
I don’t see the problem with it either. Not only are the teens who are taking an initiative setting a good example for their peers but the ability to vote. Not only that but it would further empower them to be politically active in the future when, as you mentioned, they are going through a transitioning period.
Amanda Le
07.25.2012
@amandale
Totally butchered that last comment, haha. It’s early.
I don’t see the problem with it either. Not only are the teens who are taking an initiative setting a good example for their peers but the ability to vote would further empower them to be politically active in the future when, as you mentioned, they are going through a transitioning period.