Skip to content
Subscribe

NBC-Wall Street Journal Poll - Used by CPD - Disadvantages Low-Income Americans

Published:

In recent years, the issue of widening income inequality has ignited a national conversation. It perhaps reached a fever pitch during U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign for president, as millions of low-income donors donated time and time again to the self-proclaimed democratic socialist.

Yet, following his defeat to the Wall Street-funded campaign of Hillary Clinton, many of Sanders’ former supporters are now flocking to the candidacies of third-party candidates like Governor Gary Johnson and Dr. Jill Stein.

To introduce themselves to a national audience in the remaining presidential debates, Johnson and Stein must achieve a 15% average across the five polls that are hand-picked by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Are low-income Americans being adequately represented in these polls?

Of the five polls in question, only the NBC-Wall Street Journal poll makes this information readily available to the public. And, the documentation suggests that this poll undercuts the voices of low-income Americans.

While Census 2014 estimates show that around 47% of American households bring in less than 50k a year, the NBC-Wall Street Journal poll reports that only around 36% of its respondents fall into this income category.

WSJ Sampling

Maybe it is just harder to poll low-income Americans? Maybe high-income Americans have more time to devote for answering phone calls from pollsters?

Let’s check a point of comparison: The ABC-Washington Post poll, which is also used by the CPD.

I am thankful to E.G., a staff member at the Washington Post, who professionally and promptly responded to requests for more information on the poll. According to her email, the ABC-Washington Post poll has around 50% representation of Americans who make less than $50,000 and about 50% representation for those who make more than $50,000. That’s fantastic, because that’s right around the figure given by the Census.

As such, even when compared to its sister poll, the NBC-Wall Street Journal poll still fails to include as many lower-income Americans as it should. And, importantly, NBC provided me with documentation not available to the public. These documents show that the poll does not attempt to statistically correct for skewed income sampling.

It seems unjust that this poll be allowed to influence debate participation. All Americans, regardless of their income, deserve to have their voices represented. Johnson and Stein have likely had billions of dollars of free media taken from them as a result of these skewed polls.

Open the debates.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

NBC-Wall Street Journal Poll - Used by CPD - Disadvantages Low-Income Americans

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us