Corroborating Evidence Shows Clinton Camp Tampering with Delegate Count in Nevada

Corroborating Evidence Shows Clinton Camp Tampering with Delegate Count in Nevada
Published: 15 May, 2016
2 min read

Saturday's Nevada Democratic Convention is now mired in controversy as reports from independent sources surfaced of delegate tampering and rule changes that ignored support for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and took away delegates he earned at county conventions in March.

The 16-hour convention began with a temporary rule change that was "passed" despite not receiving a clear majority of vocal votes, according to a report from Heavy:

Sanders supporters had been worried about these rulesAccording to Jordan Chariton of The Young TurksJason Llanes

“The ruling by the chair is not debatable. It cannot be challenged, and I rule the rules have passed,” said Nevada State Democratic Chair Roberta Lange after the vote.

At the heart of the controversy is how the delegates ended up being allocated. Twelve delegates were up for grabs at the convention, even though Sanders picked up additional delegates at the Nevada county conventions in March. Those gains were essentially wiped out at the state convention, where Clinton picked up additional delegates.

The delegate allocation process can be a bit more confusing in caucus systems like Nevada. Each state party has its own rules, and in Nevada there are actually two rounds of voting. In the first round or tier (the caucus vote), Hillary Clinton edged Bernie Sanders 53% to 47% (rounded figures).

However, the second round of voting takes place at the county conventions, where as mentioned above Sanders picked up additional delegates since not enough Clinton delegates showed up. The controversial rule change negated round 2 completely.

After the vote, the convention floor broke into chaos:

https://twitter.com/rachelaveryy/status/731541323317043200

An additional video taken at the convention was posted on Facebook to document the pandemonium that erupted toward the end of the convention when a motion was made for a recount of the delegates, was seconded, but Lange ended the convention abruptly before a full vote on the motion could be taken.

IVP Donate

Heavy reports:

"Rachel Avery, who was at the Convention, told Heavy that before there was a chance for the motions to be voted on, Lange came on stage and voted herself into power to overrule the motions. “She made a motion, someone on her staff seconded it, called a vote final without hearing any nays,” Avery said.

Jason Llanes, who was also livestreaming the Convention all day, confirmed this...

“She (Lange) put in a new motion of her own, had someone second it, called for yays and nays and passed it before the nays even spoke,” he reported."

Since the convention did not reconvene on Sunday, the only avenue for recourse is legal action, which will likely come from Bernie supporters who now argue that they had no voice at the convention. Stay tuned for further coverage of this issue.

Photo Credit: jctabb / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read