Who Is Tinkering With Voters' Party Affiliations in New York?

image
Published: 18 Apr, 2016
2 min read

When Donald Trump's own family couldn't vote in New York's closed primary because they didn't switch parties in time, it made national headlines. New York has some of the strangest rules on switching political parties, mandating that a person must switch affiliation by October of the preceding year.

But now there are reports of an even stranger problem. At least

200 people have joined a lawsuit in New York claiming that their party affiliations had been switched--but not by them--making them ineligible to vote in their primary of choice this election.

The switch, one that is primarily affecting Democratic voters, will definitely help front-runner Hillary Clinton in her home state.

Bernie Sanders has repeatedly decried the closed system, one of only 11 completely closed primary states, but with a twist -- since you have to be registered for your party by October of the preceding year to be eligible to vote, it makes it even more difficult for independents and swing voters (like the Trump family) to switch in time.

Sanders has benefited from independent and swing votes in open primary states, winning by huge margins in many of these contests.

Who is doing this tinkering? In the age of the computer, there's always some form of digital paper trail of when data has been changed, but the state Board of Elections is remaining silent for the time being, presumably doing its own investigation.

The New York Board of Elections has been overwhelmed with problems in the past, called a survivor of "Boss Tweed-style politics"by one local newspaper. Tweed was one of the major players in Tammany Hall politics of the 19th century, known for rigging elections and coat-tail cronyism.

When investigated in 2014, 63 independent investigators showed up to vote as dead, incarcerated, or nonresident voters, and were still permitted to vote 61 times due to poor practices (all votes cast were write-ins for "John Test" to avoid skewing the election).

There are serious problems at the New York Board of Elections -- and where there's smoke in politics, there's almost always fire.

IVP Donate

A thorough investigation needs to take place, but it will be long after the April 19 election, and who knows how many more voters will find out at the polls that they are now ineligible to vote?

You Might Also Like

Trump sitting in the oval office with a piece of paper with a cannabis leaf on his desk.
Is Trump About to Outflank Democrats on Cannabis? Progressives Sound the Alarm
As President Donald Trump signals renewed interest in reclassifying cannabis from a Schedule I drug to Schedule III, a policy goal long championed by liberals and libertarians, the reaction among some partisan progressive advocates is not celebration, but concern....
08 Dec, 2025
-
5 min read
Malibu, California.
From the Palisades to Simi Valley, Independent Voters Poised to Decide the Fight to Replace Jacqui Irwin
The coastline that defines California’s mythology begins here. From Malibu’s winding cliffs to the leafy streets of Brentwood and Bel Air, through Topanga Canyon and into the valleys of Calabasas, Agoura Hills, and Thousand Oaks, the 42nd Assembly District holds some of the most photographed, most coveted, and most challenged terrain in the state. ...
10 Dec, 2025
-
6 min read
Ranked choice voting
Ranked Choice for Every Voter? New Bill Would Transform Every Congressional Election by 2030
As voters brace for what is expected to be a chaotic and divisive midterm election cycle, U.S. Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.), Don Beyer (Va.), and U.S. Senator Peter Welch (Vt.) have re-introduced legislation that would require ranked choice voting (RCV) for all congressional primaries and general elections beginning in 2030....
10 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read