Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump Shatter Moody's Crystal Ball for 2016

Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump Shatter Moody's Crystal Ball for 2016
Published: 04 Sep, 2015
2 min read

When it comes to predicting elections, Moody's Analytics comes about as close to the seers of the crystal ball as we can get. Accurately predicting every election since 1980, with a perfect scorecard in 2012 (including all electoral votes), the Moody's model is pretty hard to beat.

The Moody's model relies heavily on economic data, including real income, real housing, and gasoline prices, as well as political data on a state-by-state basis.

As of August 27, Moody's has the Democrats winning 326 to 212 in the Electoral College. But this year is also the first year with a caveat attached to each updated projection:

"The model results are less valid if either political party nominates a non-establishment candidate. Elections since 1980 have been between candidates who are generally thought to be largely in the mainstream of American politics. Some of the current presidential candidates are more on the fringes of the political spectrum." - Moody's Analytics

In short, if Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump are among the final contenders, all bets are off.Of particular interest is that four states account for the battleground in the Moody's model for the past several months: Colorado, Florida, Ohio, and Virginia.

For the Republicans to win, they must sweep these battleground states, winning a bare minimum of the three large states to win the Electoral College.

If Sanders or Trump are thrown in, the balance in the "leaning" states is disrupted, possibly putting into play all of them. This would represent the largest collection of battleground states in a modern election if that played out.

One of the biggest factors in the Moody's model is how long the current gas prices will stay low. The lower they remain, the better off the Democratic Party fares.

This is an odd reversal in prediction models, since cheap gas was more of a Republican standard as late as 2012.

The Moody's team has also warned that the recent volatility in world equity markets could impact future updates to their model, as well as the implementation of the now certain Iran nuclear deal.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read