Unaffiliated Voters Outnumber Party Voters -- So Why Can't They Vote?

image
Jane SusskindJane Susskind
Published: 10 Apr, 2015
1 min read
The recent

Pew Research Center study analyzing trends in party affiliation among Americans has made its rounds in the media, with different news sources drawing different conclusions, depending on their slant.

One fact that remains constant in the reporting of the study: Americans are increasingly deciding not to affiliate with a political party, and 39 percent of Americans identify as independent. 

The trend began in the early 1990s when polarization and political gridlock were high, Linda Killian, executive director of Independent Americans United and senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center, writes in the Wall Street Journal.

Political gridlock is ever more present in today's political landscape, leading to more Americans identifying as politically independent.

"This disaffiliation is a conscious choice and reflects Americans’ dissatisfaction with political leaders, the two major parties, and the political system’s dysfunction and polarization."  - Linda Killian

Killian notes that while independent voters are the most rapidly growing political demographic, most still cannot participate in primary elections, a point IVN.us has been making since its creation back in 2006:

"The largest geographic concentration of independent voters is in New England. In most states in that region, independents are permitted to vote in primaries. About half of the states do not allow independents to participate in primary elections. If all primary elections were open to unaffiliated voters, the number of independents would almost certainly be higher." - Linda Killian

What does this mean for election? Since unaffiliated and independent-minded voters are repeatedly shut out of an integral stage of the election, the people who do participate most in politics are also the most partisan and most ideological.

In turn, the candidates elected represent the small, ideologically-driven sub-sect of the voting population (think Ted Cruz), leading even more voters to regress from politics, and the vicious cycle repeats itself...

Read the full Wall Street Journal article here.

You Might Also Like

National Reform Organizations Condemn Texas and California Over Gerrymandering
National Reform Organizations Condemn Texas and California Over Gerrymandering
The United States has passed the point of no return in the unprecedented mid-cycle redistricting fight between Texas and California, which threatens to expand to other states like Republican-controlled Florida and Democratic-controlled New York....
25 Aug, 2025
-
6 min read
Gerrymandering Wars Escalate Beyond Texas and California: A National Race to the Bottom?
Gerrymandering Wars Escalate Beyond Texas and California: A National Race to the Bottom?
Republicans currently hold a narrow 219 to 212 edge over Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, with four vacancies: three from Democratic members who have died and one from a Republican who has resigned. This is the smallest House majority held by either party in nearly a century. The razor-thin margin means the stakes in the 2026 midterms could not be higher. With so few competitive seats left nationwide, both parties are turning to mid-decade redistricting as a way to secure advantages....
27 Aug, 2025
-
10 min read
Hand in ballot that says independent on it.
Why 1.2 Million California Independents Are The Biggest Wild Card in American Politics Today
The fate of Proposition 50, California’s proposed redistricting measure, may come down to voters who have declined to join one of the two major political parties....
22 Aug, 2025
-
5 min read