Up to 20% of Americans Live in Poverty, Statistics Reveal

image
BB
Published: 04 Mar, 2014
3 min read
A lot of conversation has occurred about the minimum wage -- or livable wage movement -- popularized by a recent victory in Seatac, Washington, which spread across the state and has now gained the attention of President Obama.

Across the country, employees are striking, picketing, and staging walkouts, protesting low wages and poor working conditions. Walmart, in particular, provides associates a directory to help them locate their local medicaid office. Further, Jon Lehman, a former 17-year veteran Walmart manager, disclosed to PBS that he was instructed by Walmart Corporate how to direct his employees to apply for charity, community assistance, and state-provided welfare.

Federal poverty guidelines, provided by the U.S. DHHS, Office for the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, are used by programs to determine eligibility for financial assistance. For a single person living in the continental United States (Excluding Alaska and Hawaii), the poverty level is $11,490 a year. This amount represents approximately 7.3 months of gross income working full-time at $9 per hour. A month of employment -- for purposes of this article -- being defined as 173 hours of work.

After tax deductions, and before receiving a tax return, the net income (or take home pay) is actually somewhere between 8 and 9 months of work, based on a single individual claiming zero or one on their withholding statement.

For a family of four, the poverty line is $23,550.

It would be useful to have some sort of realistic measurement of necessary costs associated with maintaining a household at a reasonable level, rather than the poverty level alone. Fortunately, the IRS has adopted

collection and financial standards which define what it considers to be necessary living expenses.

For 2013, in King County, Washington, the IRS states that necessary housing and utility costs for a single person are capped at $2,106 per month with food, clothing, and other necessary expenses being capped at $583 per month. In addition, out-of-pocket health care is capped at $60 per month for a person under age 65.

It’s math time again.

To be able to be able to pay just the IRS defined necessary living expenses in King County, Washington, this single person would need to earn $2,749.00 a month ($2106+$583+$60=$2,749) minimum. This amounts to $15.89 per hour. After considering tax deductions on gross income, the necessary hourly wage is higher.

These expenses do not include car payments or costs associated with keeping necessary career skills up to date, such as college or technical education.

IVP Donate

These numbers, to me, represent a reasonable livable wage for a single person.

The Alliance for a Just Society recently published a report called the 15th Annual Job Gap Study. The study’s findings included the following:

  • A single person needed to earn $16.04 per hour to pay for necessary living expenses.
  • There are 7 job seekers for every open job that pays a livable wage being defined at $15 per hour or higher.

Not earning a livable wage is unsustainable.

If the 39 percent of employers above continue to not pay a livable wage to their employees, they are going to contribute to a potential social services disaster. By some statistics, between 16 to 20 percent of Americans now live in poverty.

However, I believe if employees start earning a livable wage, it will strengthen the economy -- locally and nationally -- by virtue of these additional funds being used to consume goods and services. This will create increased revenues for both the public and private sector.

Employers are starting to wake up. Costco figured this out some time ago. They pay a livable wage and are not only profitable, but remain competitive. Henry Ford, the automaker, figured this out a long time ago: he paid his employees enough so they could afford to purchase his cars.

Photo Credit: spirit of america / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read