Up to 20% of Americans Live in Poverty, Statistics Reveal

image
Published: 04 Mar, 2014
3 min read
A lot of conversation has occurred about the minimum wage -- or livable wage movement -- popularized by a recent victory in Seatac, Washington, which spread across the state and has now gained the attention of President Obama.

Across the country, employees are striking, picketing, and staging walkouts, protesting low wages and poor working conditions. Walmart, in particular, provides associates a directory to help them locate their local medicaid office. Further, Jon Lehman, a former 17-year veteran Walmart manager, disclosed to PBS that he was instructed by Walmart Corporate how to direct his employees to apply for charity, community assistance, and state-provided welfare.

Federal poverty guidelines, provided by the U.S. DHHS, Office for the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, are used by programs to determine eligibility for financial assistance. For a single person living in the continental United States (Excluding Alaska and Hawaii), the poverty level is $11,490 a year. This amount represents approximately 7.3 months of gross income working full-time at $9 per hour. A month of employment -- for purposes of this article -- being defined as 173 hours of work.

After tax deductions, and before receiving a tax return, the net income (or take home pay) is actually somewhere between 8 and 9 months of work, based on a single individual claiming zero or one on their withholding statement.

For a family of four, the poverty line is $23,550.

It would be useful to have some sort of realistic measurement of necessary costs associated with maintaining a household at a reasonable level, rather than the poverty level alone. Fortunately, the IRS has adopted

collection and financial standards which define what it considers to be necessary living expenses.

For 2013, in King County, Washington, the IRS states that necessary housing and utility costs for a single person are capped at $2,106 per month with food, clothing, and other necessary expenses being capped at $583 per month. In addition, out-of-pocket health care is capped at $60 per month for a person under age 65.

It’s math time again.

To be able to be able to pay just the IRS defined necessary living expenses in King County, Washington, this single person would need to earn $2,749.00 a month ($2106+$583+$60=$2,749) minimum. This amounts to $15.89 per hour. After considering tax deductions on gross income, the necessary hourly wage is higher.

These expenses do not include car payments or costs associated with keeping necessary career skills up to date, such as college or technical education.

IVP Donate

These numbers, to me, represent a reasonable livable wage for a single person.

The Alliance for a Just Society recently published a report called the 15th Annual Job Gap Study. The study’s findings included the following:

  • A single person needed to earn $16.04 per hour to pay for necessary living expenses.
  • There are 7 job seekers for every open job that pays a livable wage being defined at $15 per hour or higher.

Not earning a livable wage is unsustainable.

If the 39 percent of employers above continue to not pay a livable wage to their employees, they are going to contribute to a potential social services disaster. By some statistics, between 16 to 20 percent of Americans now live in poverty.

However, I believe if employees start earning a livable wage, it will strengthen the economy -- locally and nationally -- by virtue of these additional funds being used to consume goods and services. This will create increased revenues for both the public and private sector.

Employers are starting to wake up. Costco figured this out some time ago. They pay a livable wage and are not only profitable, but remain competitive. Henry Ford, the automaker, figured this out a long time ago: he paid his employees enough so they could afford to purchase his cars.

Photo Credit: spirit of america / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read