NJ Voters Spend $100 Million on Elections They Can't Participate In

image
Author: Bob Conner
Created: 20 Feb, 2014
Updated: 14 Oct, 2022
3 min read
Public funding of political party activities is certainly not a new concept in the United States. In fact, the idea was floated as early as 1907 by President Theodore Roosevelt. However, electoral systems have evolved dramatically since President Roosevelt's time.

onetwothree.v2

That evolution has created many concerns and questions which must be addressed. For example, why are voters subsidizing private political organizations though their taxes? Why is subscription to ideology-driven partisanship a prerequisite to exercising one's constitutional right to suffrage? And, how did those rights devolve to the point wherein over half of registered voters no longer have a voice?

New Jersey is just one of many states with a closed primary system, which means voters have to be registered with one of the major parties to participate in primary elections to select party candidates. Because political parties are private organizations and these elections are meant to select the candidates of political parties, primaries should be considered private activities funded with public dollars.

Financing political party activities is expensive, regardless of where the money comes from. However, using public funds to do so requires promotion of a fully accessible process for all those whose taxes are being utilized -- a fact that has been overlooked by states like New Jersey for decades.

New Jersey’s odd-year gubernatorial races increase primary frequency. Combined with national partisan primaries and convention delegate nominations, the state's taxpayers have spent a total of $192.6 million in the span of 13 years on these activities alone.

New Jersey is now requesting even more from it's electorate: ten dollars from each registered voter with which to fund private political activities, increasing the cost by an additional $49.6 million.

The table below provides public spending data for state primaries since 2000:

Matched Funds

NJ Voters

Ind*

More Choice for San Diego

Percent

2001 

$11.10 M

4.59 M

2.59 M

56%

2005

$6.48 M

More Choice for San Diego

4.82 M

2.81 M

58%

2009

$5.80 M

4.95 M

2.24 M

45%

More Choice for San Diego

2013

$12.00 M

5.48 M

2.59 M

47%

Avg

$8.849 M

4.96 M

More Choice for San Diego

2.56 M

52%

*Voters not affiliated with a party.

Matched Funds

2000

3.24 M

2004

3.78 M

More Choice for San Diego

2008

4.46 M

2013

4.95 M

Avg

4.10 M

Sub Total: $16,414,904.00

Total Matched Funds: $51,813,559.46

More Choice for San Diego

Matched Funds

2002

No Matched Funds

2004

No Matched Funds

2008

No Matched Funds

2013

More Choice for San Diego

No Matched Funds

Avg

---

Salaries

$5.23 M

Ballot Printing

$6.5 M

Total Primary Cost

More Choice for San Diego

$11.73 M

Primaries Held

12

Grand Total (Gubernatorial Primaries, National Primaries and Polling Costs): $192,616,759.46

Cost/Registered Voter: $38.84

Unaffiliated Voters Contribution: $100,160,714.92.

With dismal participation among the 5,459,925 registered voters, 386,039 of them predetermined the 2013 gubernatorial race. In essence, the future of New Jersey politics was determined by 7 percent of the state’s registered voters.

With an average of 52 percent, New Jersey has been in the top five states recording the highest number of

unaffiliated voters since the beginning of the 21st century. This means a majority of New Jersey voters are denied participation in elections they contribute millions of dollars a year to and yet have no say on which candidates will be on the general election ballot.

More Choice for San Diego

For more than 100 years, partisans have manipulated the electoral process to their benefit through gerrymandering and election laws, denying access to voters who exercise their right to non-association.

The activities of theses private organizations have taken a very heavy toll on the country. They have polarized citizens beyond civil discord and have created an environment so hostile and antagonistic that elected officials can no longer find any unifying position with which to manage the government, and they have created severe apathy in the process by limiting voter choice.

New Jersey is known for milestones in the political landscape. It was the first state in the Union to ratify the Bill of Rights and the third state to ratify the U.S. Constitution. However, unless deep changes are implemented in the state's election processes, including the vital need to remove barriers that deny voters full participation in state elections, New Jersey will certainly not achieve any milestones related to representative government for all its citizens.

NJ-info-00to13.v3

Latest articles

voters at the ballot box.
4 Principles of Change Open Primary Advocates Must Embrace
This was a big year for the open primaries movement. Seven state-level campaigns and one municipal. Millions of voters declaring their support for open primaries. New leaders emerging across the country. Primary elections for the first time at the center of the national reform debate....
23 Dec, 2024
-
5 min read
House Speaker Mike Johnson
GOP vs GOP: Party Fragmentation in the New Congress
Shawn and Dan dive into the fragmentation within both parties, Elon Musk's entrance as a Republican power broker, and a recent poll showing a surprisingly high level of support for Donald Trump among people who voted for Jill Stein....
23 Dec, 2024
-
1 min read
Young person voting.
2024 Recap: Lessons Learned from the Successes and Failures of Statewide Primary Reform
In 2024, a historic number of statewide initiatives appeared on the ballot to open primary elections to all voters and candidates. Most of the initiatives failed, but reformers were successful in Washington DC. ...
19 Dec, 2024
-
2 min read