logo

Independent Voters Do Matter: A Rebuttal to Sean Sullivan and the Washington Post

image
Author: Chad Peace
Created: 09 January, 2014
Updated: 21 November, 2022
2 min read
Yesterday, Sean Sullivan of the Washington Post

wrote an article where he argued that:

While many Americans like to describe themselves as independent voters -- especially at a time when neither major party is particularly popular -- when push comes to shove, independents largely remain loyal to one side or the other.

Right now, the Democratic and Republican parties are heavily institutionalized: everything from the election laws to the data to the funding works in the favor of the two partisan teams.

Independent voters matter when you look at the political landscape through the lens of a person concerned with democracy, and not as a political consultant concerned with winning what has become a "Game of Elections."

What this perspective may indicate is that voters, on the whole, are becoming dissatisfied with the two teams altogether. This doesn't mean that there aren't Republicans and Democrats that are appealing to independent voters; it means the partisanship that drives the discourse, the debate, and, ultimately, policy is causing people to disassociate with the game altogether.

When less than 10% of voters participate in party primaries and 95% of general elections aren't competitive because of a variety of practical concerns like gerrymandering, the rise of independents might not matter.

Why is this important, despite Sullivan's suggestion that it isn't?

Because states like Washington and California are creating nonpartisan elections where parties can't control the outcome by limiting meaningful participation in our democracy to the small partisan bases.

There will be a 'silent revolution' as more states enact nonpartisan election reforms. It will be silent because often times the same people will get elected. The same party will appear to have control. But, the voters whom these elected officials are accountable to will change.

Why does this matter?

IVP Existence Banner

Because right now, those of us who live in the political weeds don't realize how much we talk to ourselves. We play a game where the rules have been written to support simplistic conclusions offered by a superficial two-sided debate.

It will be a revolution because we, who are responsible for the political discourse, will have to talk to independent-minded voters once again.

Photo Credit: Joe Belanger / shutterstock.com

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read