Amidst Concerns, Facebook to Finalize New Privacy Policy This Week

image
Published: 11 Sep, 2013
2 min read

According to a recent study published by the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project, 50 percent of Internet users are worried about the amount of personal information about them online -- an increase of 17 percent since 2009.

Growing concern with privacy online has resulted in 86 percent of Internet users taking measures to remove or mask their digital footprints, but what if your information was being shared without you knowing?

Newsflash: It is, so much so that U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg has granted final approval for Facebook’s $20 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit disputing the company's practice of sharing user information in the form of "Sponsored Stories," or activity advertisements, without the user's knowledge.

(To edit how Facebook can share your information on social ads, click HERE.)

Facebook responded with proposed updates to the 2 documents governing online privacy on the site: the Data Use Policy and Statement of Rights and Responsibilities:

"These two documents tell you about how we collect and use data, and the rules that apply when you choose to use Facebook," Chief Privacy Officer Erin Egan writes on the Facebook Site Governance Page.

The updates are an attempt at transparency, with Facebook explicitly outlining what information Facebook users automatically consent to handing over when they neglect to manually opt-out.

(To edit how Facebook can share your information with third party sites, click HERE.)

One troubling component of the updated Data Use Policy reads: “We are able to suggest that your friend tag you in a picture by scanning and comparing your friend’s pictures to information we’ve put together from your profile pictures and the other photos in which you’ve been tagged.” 

What this means is that Facebook can gather information about you not only based on information that you choose to share, but by scanning posts that your friends choose to share on the network. Facebook is essentially building the capacity to build an internal profile of any given user -- without their consent.

(To edit who can tag you in posts, click HERE.)

The revisions to Facebook's privacy policy, however, were met with fierce opposition from 6 major privacy groups who sent a joint letter urging the Federal Trade Commission to re-evaluate the language used in Facebook's privacy revisions, claiming it violates the agreement reached between the 2 groups in 2011.

Scheduled to take effect September 5, the social network has since halted the implementation of the new Facebook privacy policy:

IVP Donate

"We are taking the time to ensure that people's comments are reviewed and taken into consideration to determine whether further updates are necessary and we expect to finalize the process in the coming week," a Facebook spokesperson told The Huffington Post by email.

While the change in privacy policy is not expected to take place until later this week, when is the last time you looked at your privacy settings on Facebook?

(To edit your general privacy settings - who can see your stuff, contact you, or look you up - click HERE.)

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read