logo

New Jersey Taxpayers Pay $12 Million for a Primary They Won't Vote In

image
Author: Lucas Eaves
Created: 10 June, 2013
Updated: 14 October, 2022
2 min read

Governor Chris Christie announced that New Jersey will hold special elections in October to fill the seat left vacant after the death of Senator Frank Lautenberg. The cost of this decision has already become controversial, including the $12 million spent on a partisan primary, nobody will vote in.

To fill the vacancy, two solutions exist: nominate someone to fill in until the normally scheduled 2014 elections or organize a special election. Governor Christie chose the latter. This choice and its price tag is already receiving a lot of heat, but the focus is not where it needs to be.

New Jersey already had the elections for the governor and the state legislators scheduled for November. But Christie chose to set the date of the special election 3 weeks earlier on October 16.

“This is about guaranteeing the people of New Jersey both a choice and a voice in the process,” said Chris Christie to justify his decision.

The irony behind this declaration is that nearly half of the state's registered voters are being held back from fully participating in the electoral system. And, they will still have to pay a multi-million dollar bill.

Organizing the special elections will cost an estimated $24 million of the taxpayer's money, $12 million for the primary and $12 million for the October election. Critics have already come forward with a list of programs the governor could have restored with that money instead of spending it on the elections. Nobody has, however, raised the issue of how half of the cost of this election will be wasted on partisan primaries nobody will vote in.

New Jersey, like 19 other states, has a closed primary system meaning that only voters affiliated with a party may vote in its primary. However, according to the last voter registration, nonaffiliated voters now make up more than 47 percent of all registered voters in the state, far above the 32 percent of Democrats and 22 percent of Republicans.

The closed primary system discriminates against unaffiliated voters by making it harder for them to vote in the primary. They are allowed to vote in one of the primaries on the condition that they register with that party on election day. They will have to then re-register to regain their unaffiliated status.

This cumbersome process is not only discriminatory against nearly half of New Jersey's registered voters, but results in very low voter participation. The 2012 June primary had a 8.8 percent voter turnout, one of the lowest in the country. This number will be even lower for this election as the combination of a special election's primary set in the middle of the summer is the perfect recipe to have the least number of New Jerseyans participating.

More Choice for San Diego

The New Jersey partisan primaries are designed to provide parties with the opportunity to select their champion for the final battle set in the general elections. Since half of the state's voters decide not to be affiliated with the parties and do not participate, continuing to spend millions of taxpayer dollars on them should be reconsidered.

Latest articles

Ballot box that says vote here on it.
Newport News Mayor Advocates for Ranked Choice Voting Expansion in Virginia
Ranked choice voting is making inroads in Virginia. First, it was adopted and used in Arlington County. Then, the Charlottesville City Council approved its use. Next door, Washington DC voters overwhelmingly said "Yes" to the reform in 2024....
18 November, 2024
-
3 min read
mobile phone
Is Mobile Voting the Solution to America's Turnout Problem?
In the latest episode of Andrew Yang's Forward Podcast, Yang talks with Tusk Ventures Founder and CEO Badley Tusk about his proposal for secure mobile voting to solve a widespread voter turnout problem in the US. ...
18 November, 2024
-
1 min read
American flag with I Voted stickers on it.
Yes, Elections Have Consequences -- Primary Elections to Be Specific
Can you imagine a Republican winning in an electoral district in which Democrats make up 41% of the registered electorate? Seems farfetched in much of the country. As farfetched as a Democrat winning in a R+10 district....
16 November, 2024
-
5 min read