Sen. Rand Paul at CPAC: GOP Must Embrace Freedom
By Michael Higham | 03/15/2013 | Civil Rights, Economy, Issues | 44 CommentsIt isn’t new ground for the libertarian-minded lawmaker, but his reception at CPAC was indicative of party change:
“The GOP of old has grown stale and moss-covered… Our party is encumbered by an inconsistent approach to freedom. The new GOP will have to embrace freedom in both the economic and personal sphere.”
Sen. Paul received cheers following his contrast of the present and future of the party. The message of fiscal conservatism and social liberty could be penetrating the conventional Republican party ranks.
Last week’s 13-hour traditional filibuster has put the Senator in the political spotlight. He joked about spending 13 hours on the podium with two large binders and spent time revisiting the theme of drones and civil liberties.
Aside from Sen. Paul’s speech, CPAC mentioned political compromise sparingly. He stated, “We must stand for something so powerful and so popular that it brings people from the left and the right and the middle.”
The Senator’s speech recognized the growing importance of young voters:
“The Facebook generation can detect falseness and hypocrisy from a mile away. They are the core of the ‘leave me alone’ coalition. They doubt social security will be there for them. They worry about jobs, money, rent, and student loans.”
Around 46 million eligible voters were between the ages of 18 and 29 in the 2012 election. The youth voting bloc is expected to grow leading up to the 2016 election, making up almost one-third of the electorate. Share stat: Tweet
Young voters are increasingly independent in political affiliation. Expressing how a particular party platform is ‘good’ to these voters could be a tactic of the past. Tweet it: Tweet
Sen. Paul’s speech also covered core Republican ideals. He argued preserving the right to bear arms is dependent upon upholding the Fourth Amendment. Lowering the corporate tax rates by half and a 17 percent flat personal income tax were a part of Sen. Paul’s upcoming budget proposal.
Abolishing the Department of Education drew the biggest cheers. However, eliminating a growing agency is unlikely, but has been on the conservative agenda in the past.
If the Republican party is serious about contending in the future, embracing fundamental changes in the party platform may be necessary. Instead of preaching to the crowd, Rand Paul at CPAC shifted the crowd’s focus.





Leave Your Comment →
44 Comments
Lucas Eaves
03.15.2013
@lucaseaves
“We must stand for something so powerful and so popular that it brings people from the left and the right and the middle.” I do not really know how they will able to achieve that. Just trying to get some people from the middle would already be a good thing.
Alex Gauthier
03.15.2013
@alexg
In the coming months we’ll have to see if Rand will back up his talk with real leadership
Rebecca Wright
03.15.2013
how come fiscal conservatism means cutting programs for the poor, not thine own budgets? hmm?
Connie Hardy Jennings
03.15.2013
God, Let’s hope so!
Scott Burger
03.15.2013
For better and worse, yes.
Carlos Perez
03.15.2013
In the us the rulers are…the ….BANKS AND THE CORPORATIONS.
James Nobles
03.15.2013
They worry about Social Security not being there for them cause this ahole is trying to kill it! What hypocrisy! As for leave me along?? Facebook is a SOCIAL NETWORK!! Designed for you to connect and share with other people. This guy is a pandering idiot.
Carlos Perez
03.15.2013
For better for them, for worst for us.
Tiffany Palen-Edwards
03.15.2013
Yes, just look at how much support Ron Paul got from young people. Let’s hope that others follow in his footsteps and support a much smaller, hands-off approach to governing. We don’t elect people to tell us how much soda we can drink, we elect people to protect our rights.
Ted E. Bear
03.15.2013
I would like to know why he is just on tv and running around the country just giving speeches. When will he DO something about it ?
Mike Diffen
03.15.2013
Seems nearly all the young people I know, and I know a lot of them, like Rand Paul a lot better than they like Obama. Want to explain that, James Nobles?
James Nobles
03.15.2013
@Mike Diffen I think this qoute from US News makes an excellent point “….Young people between the ages of 18 and 29 made up a bigger share of the electorate on Tuesday than they did in past elections, according to preliminary tallies, with the percentage young voters standing at 19 percent. And President Obama overwhelmingly won that group compared to Mitt Romney”. Hmmm….Seems young people won the election for Obama. Strange. My final explanation would be – The young people you know aren’t very bright?
Robynne Merguerdijian
03.15.2013
I don’t really associate Republicans or for that matter “infamous Conservative meet ups with “Independent Voter” the lust for youth approval is dubiously covetous too…
I honestly feel as though the weight of the party’s legacy this time it’s the “R” after his name, will result in mass disappointments to put it lightly, remember this post –it will simply come true in a matter of time.
Robynne Merguerdijian
03.15.2013
“Pandering” that’s a good distinction.
Nancy Janzen
03.15.2013
Rebecca I am the poor and a fiscal conservative because the plans you put forth on your side most of the money gets wasted before it leaves Washington. The federal government is the most inefficient way to get anything done in this country.
James Nobles
03.15.2013
@Mike Diffen I think this qoute from US News makes an excellent point “….Young people between the ages of 18 and 29 made up a bigger share of the electorate on Tuesday than they did in past elections, according to preliminary tallies, with the percentage young voters standing at 19 percent. And President Obama overwhelmingly won that group compared to Mitt Romney”. Hmmm….Seems young people won the election for Obama. Strange. My final explanation would be – The young people you know aren’t very bright
Christopher Smith
03.15.2013
Except when judging a Liberal Democrat!
Mike Diffen
03.15.2013
Daniel Offerman : I enjoy a bit of back and forth, exchanging of views, as long as it doesn’t become abusive, so thanks for replying. You didn’t answer my question, and I have done the research to know that you can’t. The young people’s vote has nothing to do with the question I asked you. And many young people are turning toward Libertarian principles rather than Liberal ones because they now see what Obama is doing to our country.
Erin Mixon
03.15.2013
Military members are poor, yet work every day for this country and their pathetically low pay checks. I don’t see anyone standing up for them and all the cuts being made to their livelihoods, assistance programs, civilian workers who help them run things, funding the schools that are predominately their children, etc. If you want to get upset about the “poor” programs being cut, then you should start by standing up for the military.
Mike Diffen
03.15.2013
Oops, I meant to put in James Nobles. I had copied and pasted another name on another comment section. At any rate, young people in droves are deserting Obama now, regardless of whether they voted for him.
Bryce Fish
03.15.2013
Judging by these comments, my generation is a bunch of conspiracy theorists who think that everything is a plot against them.
Sam TheButcher
03.15.2013
Social security should be killed, because it’s BANKRUPT! You obviously have no clue by what he meant when he said “leave me alone”. We’re tired of the government intrusion in our lives (both socially and economically).
James Nobles
03.15.2013
Obviously you don’t have a clue. Social Security is not bankrupt. If don’t like the government intruding into your life then please stay off public roads when traveling, use private roads only. Do not fly (FAA, another government intrusion). Please source your own drinking what from a private source and do not call 911. Walk it like you talk it…
James Nobles
03.15.2013
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntharvey/2011/04/08/why-social-security-cannot-go-bankrupt/
Sam TheButcher
03.15.2013
Most are clueless about politics. They have no idea the level of tyranny Obama is perpetrating on the American people. From indefinite detention of American citizens w/out trial (NDAA), to the implementation of drones over US soil, to his support of the Patriot Act, to HR347, to FISA, to upcoming gun control legislation, the list goes on and on and on…He’s taken W’s failed policies and expanded every one of them. Since he’s been in office, it’s been a non-stop assault on the Bill of Rights. So much for upholding the Constitution.
Independent Voter
03.15.2013
Please try and make your arguments without the name calling.
Robynne Merguerdijian
03.15.2013
Weimar Republic says: http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/unitedstates
Timothy Francis
03.15.2013
I don’t think younger voters have good discernment. Here in California they voted back in Jerry Brown who has been lying to voters ever since he was sworn back it. If not for the state controller who tells us the financial facts, one would believe Jerry is eliminated the deficit, when in fact he “borrowed” 14 billion from programs and funds, and got a loan for 10 billion, to pay off the deficit. meanwhile we still have a 10 billion dollar loan, and 14 billion that needs to be made up for somewhere else. Like playing musical chairs. He lied, and the youth bought it
Don Heath
03.15.2013
Paul, as usual, goes wrong from the get go. First, calling them the Facebook generation shows that he is out of touch. Second, if they could “detect falseness and hypocrisy from a mile away,” they wouldn’t be taken in by him. Third, if they were “the core of the leave me alone coalition,” they would not be demonstrating so much activism in social welfare causes. Fourth, they have already decided that it will be up to them to make Social Security work for them. They believe that they have what it takes to overcome the problems of jobs, money, rent and student loans. Like every generation, they are optimistic about their ability to do better, much better, than the previous generations. The popularity that Paul enjoys with them now stems from only one thing, his antiwar stance.
Anne Jackson
03.15.2013
He’s a weasel who attaches his Life begins at conception amendment to FEMA’s Flood bill. I don’t trust a darn word this teapubican says.
Eric Hutchins
03.15.2013
Without name calling? That’s the only way these “progressives” know how to argue. I don’t agree with Paul 100% (I’m pro-choice) but he’s spot on about the changes that need to take place within the Republican Party, which was his audience for this speech. The GOP needs to recognize that its brand of social conservatism has no currency with the majority of younger people. It can attract younger voters only by demonstrating fiscal responsibility with military and entitlement reform.
Anne Jackson
03.15.2013
Since 2010 the Republicans have been attacking womens rights to their own bodies with over 1200 pices of legislation. From GA forcing women to carry dead fetuses to Iowa charging a woman for a miscarriage. To NH proposing a bill to force a woman who may die to get a second opinion before she can make her choice choice to get an aboriton which puts her health at more risk. Allowing doctors to lie to women who want to get an aboriton. Forcing doctors to do a vaginal probe before reciving an abortion(rape with an object)….ND forcing women to carry unviable pregnanices….Republicans are not doctors, yet they sure do like to play one….Seems like young woman CLEARLY want the Republicans to stay out of their doctors office. Goverment has no business wasting tax payer $$ governing vaginas…sick! Rand Paul is NOT for women. Everyone talks about drones and gun rights while laws hurting women are trying to be passed everyday. Oh the hypocrisy!!
Stefanie Mastro
03.15.2013
I think it says more about what the parties have become more than the youth. I bet less than half the country is strongly in favor of either Two main parties
Dionesio C Grava
03.15.2013
You’re asking about our voters? Unfortunately the majority of American voters today mostly think about what they can get from the gov’t for free and are being herded to polling places by community organizers and unions. It has nothing to do with the best of campaign platforms anymore. It’s about me, my, mine. It’s about people who don’t like to work and want the gov’t to sustain them with freebies all the time. It’s about those who want leaders who will support having their undocumented kin to be accepted here without going through the process. Ahhh… to be lax with our immigration laws, that’s a great comeon for some voters.
Damon Lee
03.15.2013
Slash the war machine and I am all in…
Oleg Dulin
03.15.2013
Cut defense, cut the anti science crap, cut the social conservatism, and I am all in. Until then, I vote against republicans.
Gerry Feldman
03.15.2013
Oleg, you are describing a libertarian. True small-government fiscal conservatism without the hypocracy of huge military spending and bible-based social restrictions.
Jeremy Hills
03.15.2013
@Stefanie Mastro brings up a valid point. Looking at the 2012 election…Only 33% of the population voted for one of the two party system candidates. Just over 16% voted for Obama. To add to this, those who voted for third party or independent candidates found their votes defaulted to the candidate who won their respective states. The fact that less of the “youth vote” voted for Obama then in 2008, makes the fact that they are expected to make up a third of the vote in 2016 and that they will lean toward independent candidates very significant. Paul is simply trying to get some of that power back towards the party he embraced last election. The previous generation always views the current one as “ignorant and misguided,” but this only identifies the disconnect they have with actually knowing who we are. And for those calling those in favor of returning to constitutional adherence as “conspiracy theorists” only shows how brainwashed you are by the establishment who have decided to demonize the word as if it was a bad thing. Conspiracy theories merely mean that you perceive there to be more going on then we are being informed of…and that seems pretty spot on considering who is inhabiting Washington right now. Just my opinion. I’m sure it will find agreement and disagreement, but that just makes you independent thinkers regardless of how you review this opinion. Have a good day all!
Christopher Smith
03.15.2013
Hey James Nobles you can shove your roads argument. Sorry but you are ignorant. Until 1913 we payed 000000 federal income taxes, had the greatest education system, railroads, ROADS, and military on the face of the planet. Your progressive gotcha comment is purely ignorant.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act
Michael Snider
03.15.2013
Look who he ran against.
Richard Pruett
03.15.2013
TYPICAL!!!
Mike Javedan
03.16.2013
Yes we need people like him to take this country back 100 years, to good old days of horse and buggy
Timothy Francis
03.16.2013
a success female? Jerry has never had a real job. He ran against a female who has overcome the male dominated business world. She should have been the epitome of liberalism, an icon of democrat beliefs.
Johnny Ritchie
03.16.2013
Let them die, will not fly with me.