Colorado Dismisses Labeling Genetically Modified Foods
By Brenda Evans | 03/11/2013 | Activism, Science | 30 CommentsThe House of Representatives Health, Insurance and Environment Committee in Denver voted 7-2 against House Bill 903, introduced by State Rep. Jeanne Labuda, calling for the labeling of genetically engineered food.
After a five hour hearing, the committee decided that labeling should be determined at the federal level rather than the state level. Following the decision, Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) announced they will co-sponsor a bill that would make GMO labels a federal requirement. Share the news: Tweet
Farmers and food producers who opposed the bill argued that a label requirement is not necessary as the FDA has found no health or safety differences between conventionally produced and GMO foods. According to the opponents of the bill, labeling would cause an increase in food prices. Tweet it: Tweet
Proponents of labeling GMOs claim they have a right to know what foods they are consuming. Although American Association for the Advancement of Science has defended the crops’ safety, Boulder iJournal states that some independent, peer-reviewed research suggests that GMOs can deteriorate liver and kidney functions and impair embryonic development.
According to the Boulder iJournal, more than 50 countries around the world either significantly restrict or outright ban the production and sale of GMOs. Share: Tweet
It is not just health and safety concerns that have activists pushing against GMOs. As in the case of Bowman v. Monsanto Co, GMO seeds have caused legal battles over the improper use of patented seeds.
As with any relatively new technology, there are plenty of uncertainties and new issues that need to be addressed.
With the growing push for labeling genetically modified foods, Whole Foods announced it will work with suppliers as they transition to sourcing non-GMO ingredients or to clearly label products with ingredients containing GMOs by 2018.
Whole Foods Co-Chief Executive Officer, Walter Robb, stated that they expect to meet key milestones of the project well before the five year mark.
“We heard our customers loud and clear asking us for GMO labeling and we are responding where we have control: in our own stores,” Robb said.
Although Robb supports a federal GMO labeling law, he stated that Whole Foods is working to address the consumer demands as immediately as possible.
With multiple states, companies and organizations addressing this issue, do you think it is important to have such foods labeled? Ask on Twitter: Tweet





Leave Your Comment →
30 Comments
Alex Gauthier
03.11.2013
@alexg
strange how they deferred to the federal govt on this. Usually states prefer not to rely on federal regulations
Lucas Eaves
03.11.2013
@lucaseaves
True. It feels like in this instance they only relied on the federal government to refuse to do something.
Michael Higham
03.11.2013
@michaelhigham
I imagine there would be substantial cost to the state to administer a labeling law. I believe the ‘right to know’ is important, and I think it’ll come in due time.
Brenda Evans
03.11.2013
@brenda
Yes, from what I understood it would be more costly for states to investigate sourcing and label foods themselves. Whole Foods on the other hand seems to have no issue with doing just that.
Carol Cantara Palmer via Facebook
03.11.2013
Unbelievable. Guess what state I will avoid?!
Kim Renae Raeder- Erbacher via Facebook
03.11.2013
Very very sad. Just more proof who our “Representatives” really lie in bed with, and it’s clearly not the American citizens!
Daphine Wilson via Facebook
03.11.2013
Of course, we have a right to know what we are eating. They are killing us to make a few cents profit on their items!
Scrotus Maximus via Facebook
03.11.2013
YES. It is called the proper and fair dissemination of information. hayek was quite clear on this.
Then again – Monsanto has their best lobbyist in the White House.
Leon Hall via Facebook
03.11.2013
If I were a creative sardonic rabble rouser I would send those on the board GMO food products for their kids. Since they chose to pass the buck, I’d be thinking lets pass it directly to the consumers free of charge!
Steve Cox via Facebook
03.11.2013
If you’re going to label it, label it not just that it’s modified, but what it’s modified to achieve.
“Genetically modified” food isn’t automatically bad for you.
Some genetic modifications are simply to make a stalk of wheat grow more edible wheat on it. Why is that bad? Without those kinds of genetic modifications, with a population growing like ours, people will eventually starve because if you want to double your wield of wheat, you can either grow double the wheat per stalk, or double the land you’re growing it on.
Brian Sparks via Facebook
03.11.2013
Colorado is quickly becoming California Jr. Poison the people without warning and instate tuition for illegal immigrants.
Jack Killingsworth via Facebook
03.11.2013
It’s about marketing not science!
Stephen Bone via Facebook
03.11.2013
Of course not. The Constitution provides no authority for the FDA, let alone such regulations. The States however should be allowed to implement such regulations without federal interference or protection of giant agribusiness (which is the real problem). The federal courts should uphold the prosecution of any such foods shown to be harmful or damaging physically or economically.
Mark Biglen via Facebook
03.11.2013
Guess who wont be getting my vote next election? Not that they would have anyway very sad my State chose to let the Fed decide this for us.
Leon Hall via Facebook
03.11.2013
Unfortunately for us, the FDA (which we all know is above reproach cough cough…) doesn’t do it’s own investigating of GMO, it relies on whatever test results Monsanto hands it. And the chemical company Monsanto issued a statement that it’s up to the FDA to do it’s own testing. But you’re free to test it on your family since it’s on the shelf of thousands of stores and products.
Allan Carroll via Facebook
03.11.2013
i’d like the feds to stay out of as much as possible …
Elise Hokman via Facebook
03.11.2013
All levels of government keep telling us ‘buyer beware’. I agree with Steve that just because its gmo doesn’t automatically means its bad. To me this issue is about informed choice. As a buyer, I should be able to know what I am buying and where it is from. Period.
Ashley Clayton via Facebook
03.11.2013
Steve, how do you know it “isn’t automatically bad for you”? Have you seen the study on rats that were fed only GMO corn developing huge tumors? There has been no longterm studies on this issue, except the ones done by Monsanto and friends. This is about money/profit. If they have to label their products, then their profits will go down because most people don’t trust it, and I don’t blame them. I suggest you look into the history of Monsanto. You will be surprised at what you find, I know I was. I will be avoiding GMO foods as much as possible. I’m just hoping that I can.
Tamara Johnson via Facebook
03.11.2013
Yes
Bryce Miller via Facebook
03.11.2013
The federal government must not require food labeling unless the constitution allows for it, and I don’t think it does. Don’t think that the government is the only solution. If we start buying independently-verified GMO-free food as much as possible, food companies will get the memo and start making non-GMO food to increase their profits. No government needed :). (Am I right?)
Jo Brenda Lee via Facebook
03.11.2013
http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/blog/gmo-labeling-coming-whole-foods-market
Steve Cox via Facebook
03.11.2013
Ashley, I know it’s not automatically bad for me because I understand how our digestive system and body chemistry work.
Did you understand what I said?
If a stalk of wheat is genetically modified to create a higher yield of wheat per stalk, how is it even possible that it would matter to your stomach?
Steve Cox via Facebook
03.11.2013
Bryce, the Constitution does allow it. That’s really not the issue.
Bobbi Gallegos via Facebook
03.11.2013
it should be up to the Federal level, but as someone previously posted, that is not going to happen. With high paid lobbyists the big food companies will keep that from happening. It then becomes up to us as consumers to figure it out. There are a lot of blogs and information on the internet that gives you lists of the foods that contain gmo’s … take time to find that out. IT IS WORTH IT
Steve Cox via Facebook
03.11.2013
Bottom line, a blanket statement or idea that ALL genetic modification of food is bad is not smart, and frankly it makes me believe you guys don’t understand genetics very well.
But certainly, I’m for having it SPECIFICALLY labeled, meaning if it has a genetic modification that makes it create its own pesticide, I’d like to know that.
Labeling ALL genetically modified food regardless of the TYPE of modification is stupid, though.
Steve Cox via Facebook
03.11.2013
As a good analogy of my point, labeling all food that is genetically modified ONLY as genetically modified is like passing a law to report any food that includes any bacteria.
Some bacteria is good for you. Some makes you sick.
Shannon Drinkwine Covel via Facebook
03.11.2013
Ashley, are you aware that human beings have been selectively breeding crops for genetics since agriculture has been around? The difference is that now we do it in a lab rather than selective breeding. Monsanto and their practices are not one and the same with GM crops. Round-up ready corn, for example, is not the only type of GM corn on the market nor are these GM crops used for only food consumption. It’s somewhat ridiculous to lump all crops into the same category because of the practices of one, rather corrupt, company.
Shannon Drinkwine Covel via Facebook
03.11.2013
If you have a problem with GMOs, then don’t buy that which isn’t labeled or support supermarkets that only sell labeled foods. The call for more government regulation in every aspect of our life isn’t always the answer; some personal responsibility goes a long way.
Ana Manrique via Facebook
03.11.2013
Produts that are NOT GMO, should have a label saying WE ARE NOT GMO. This is while something else happens…
Deanna Sy via Facebook
03.11.2013
Monsanto is adept at protecting their interests. The rest of us don’t want their poison.