Sacramento Addresses Gun Control Bills Through Concrete Legislation
By Blake Bunch | 02/01/2013 | California, Issues, Legislation, Legislators, News Ticker, Role of Government, Safety | 6 CommentsLawmakers in California hashed out a slew of bills regarding the hot-button issue of gun control on Wednesday. Sparked by the Newtown shootings, and their own personal experiences, several legislators made it clear that they were to face impending death threats in moving forward with any gun control legislation.
These death threats, ominous as they may be, have not halted California legislators one iota. Senator Don Perata (D-Oakland), was actually driven to purchasing a firearm for himself in response to the threats. Tweet
Perata is no stranger to gun violence, as he was the victim of a carjacking in Oakland in 2007. Though he was uninjured, and eventually relocated his car, Perata said:
“There are too damn many guns out there and now I have exhibit a. I’ve known it, but now I really know it, and it’s very frightening – having a gun three feet from your face and any mistake and that would be the end of it. He’s a young kid, I’m not excusing it, but guys like that make dumb mistakes.”
Prior to the incident, Perata was already an outspoken gun control advocate.
Perata and former Senator David Roberti implored the Legislature to strengthen gun laws throughout the state, which gun rights advocates believe are already some of the toughest in the U.S.
According to the LA Times, two other legislators, Assemblymen Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) and Rob Bonta (D-Alameda), have introduced a tax on ammunition. Though taxes driven from ammunition sales will benefit preventative causes in gun control, both legislators’ bills would differ in where the funding is to be utilized.
Assembly Bill 187, which was introduced by Bonta, would raise funding for policing crime-laden areas through the proposed ammo tax.
Dickenson’s proposed “nickel a bullet” tax would be utilized to establish a statewide mental illness screening program for children. This legislation is highly preventative, in that if an illness is discovered early, intervention measures would be taken. Tweet
Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, a gun rights advocacy group, rebuked the proposed bills.
“It is just unfair,” Paredes said. “Bullets don’t cause crime. Criminals cause crime, and we ought to be putting criminals away for longer sentences.” Tweet quote: Tweet
In 2012, gun dealers sold 600,000 guns, which was a significant increase from nearly 350,000 in 2002. Despite the quantifiable jump within a decade, gun-related deaths fell from about 3,200 annually to about 2,800, trending with a nationwide “drop in violent crime.” Tweet stat: Tweet
The steadfastness of Perata, Bonta, Dickenson, and Roberti — despite looming death threats — shows some shred of hope for gun control legislation in California. Known as a bellwether of progressive gun legislation, it is definitely beneficial that the state is addressing this issue in concrete terms.
Though they are sure to meet opposition from constituents, as well as those in the Legislature, these legislators show no signs of easing up on this issue.






Leave Your Comment →
6 Comments
Alex Gauthier
02.01.2013
@alexg
so many justifications for opposing viewpoints on the gun issue. Personal experiences can’t be ignored but the long term trend of fewer gun deaths despite higher supply seems to give credence to gun proponents arguments.
Lucas Eaves
02.01.2013
@lucaseaves
Sometimes it only requires a few courageous men to make history.
Michael Dishmon
02.01.2013
@bizurk
In 2012, gun dealers sold 600,000 guns, which was a significant increase from nearly 350,000 in 2002. Despite the quantifiable jump within a decade, gun-related deaths fell from about 3,200 annually to about 2,800, trending with a nationwide “drop in violent crime.”
If this stat is true, then gun control doesn’t work.
Trotdoc
02.01.2013
@trotdoc
The mental health system is very broken and desperately needs repair, but as a psychiatrist, IMO, tying funding for mental health to ANY single, politically controversial issue is not the solution. It is short-sited and ill conceived, as the vast majority of problems with the mental health system are totally unrelated to violence or criminality. Improving the mental health system and whether or not there should be additional controls or taxes on guns and ammunition are TOTALLY SEPARATE AND DIFFERENT issues that should not be related for political expediency on any side of the argument. That would only make funding of mental health a stigmatized political football, rather than a socially important non-partisan issue.
Adam Luke
02.01.2013
@adamluke
The fact is, once again, politicians have resorted to shell games. Chicago is the imperial city of Gun control, yet more die every year and no matter how hard the reigns are pulled in. GUNS are still making their way into the city. NOW, California takes aim at ammo, I must ask, if there is a black market on guns and If criminals are getting their hands on guns illegally, what would make BULLETS even harder to get? Criminals DO NOT pay taxes, CRIMINALS are not purchasing their ammo at gun stores to be tracked by reciepts and credt card transactions. So once more, the legal beagel, law abiding citizen will be taxed and burdened by crimes THEY NEVER COMMITED. Any tax that is raised from these bills will NOT make it to the entended sources. Ca just raised taxes with Prop 30 to fund the school system, but now has released that not all the funds are going to be able to make it to the schools. What will be different with this Ammo tax for mental health? Or crime-laden police departments?
Chicago furniture moving
04.15.2013
This post will assist the internet users for creating new webpage or even a
weblog from start to end.