Potential California Tobacco Tax Hike: Revisiting the Tobacco Debate
By Blake Bunch | 01/23/2013 | California, Education, Issues, Legislation, News Ticker, Safety, Taxes | 54 CommentsA group of California state officials, which includes Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom and Democratic strategist Jason Kinney, are currently backing a $1 per pack increase on tobacco products. The funds driven from this tobacco tax hike will, in turn, be used for college scholarships and financial aid. Tweet
This initiative, according to an article on ABC News could bring in an estimated $750 million within its first year. An early version of this initiative was released last month. The way the initiative is written, tax revenue would fall under the state’s general fund. This means that funds will not go to other programs, including all forms of education, which seems a bit contradictory.
Proposition 29, titled the Tobacco Tax for Cancer Research, was one of the most narrowly defeated propositions on the June 2012 ballot. This proposition, had it been approved, would have increased the tax on cigarettes to $1 per pack. Prior to the proposition, the tax was set at 87 cents. So, the new addition to the price of cigarettes under Prop. 29 would equal $1.87 per pack.
A recent piece of legislation, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, is a federal law that gives the FDA authority to regulate the manufacture, sale, distribution, labeling, advertising, and promotion of tobacco products.
The act utilizes research that claims a majority of new smokers are under the age of eighteen, obviously under the legal age to use tobacco products. Some key facets of the Tobacco Control Act entail more prominent warning labels, restricting product advertisement and promotion, collecting data on tobacco constituents, and many more attempts to better public health.
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), nineteen percent of Americans were smokers in 2010. Each day, approximately 3,800 teenagers under the age of eighteen try tobacco products for the first time. Of those 3,800, close to 1,000 take up using tobacco on a daily basis. Tweet this stat: Tweet
The CDC also claims that states have “billions of dollars available to them” from tobacco excise taxes and settlements, of which they use an extremely small percentage. They also found that in 2013, states will collect $25.7 billion from tobacco taxes and legal settlements, but will spend less than 2 percent on tobacco control programs.
Tobacco is regarded as one of those vices that is simply “recession proof.” Regardless of how high the tax were to go up, citizens will continue to use tobacco products.
Increasing the tax in California by another dollar could prove beneficial to education funding, which Governor Jerry Brown has set aside $250 million per university system. Though still an initiative, Newsom and Kinney’s legislation could be useful to the state, but will be met with high opposition, just like Prop. 29.






Leave Your Comment →
54 Comments
Lucas Eaves
01.23.2013
@lucaseaves
The number of teens who pick up smoking is really interesting and alarming. I don’t want to even think of what is the number in Paris where you can see young teen smoking everywhere despite the cigatettes being more expensive than in California.
Michael Higham
01.23.2013
@michaelhigham
I would support an increase in tobacco since it doesn’t really affect me, but at the same time it’s like we’d be leeching off of smokers. I suppose the old argument is that increased prices would steer smokers away from cigarettes.
Daniel Howle
01.23.2013
Don’t underestimate the effect increasing the tax a dollar a pack will have on crime. Organized crime, gangs and even terrorists groups will benefit from the tax increase. A case of cigarettes, 60 cartons or 600 packs, will have $1125 in state taxes and a retail value of over $4,000. A shipping container or truck trailer will have over $4 million in retail value. Cigarettes are a commodity that moves off Mom and Pop store shelves overnight and the potential profit from black market and counterfeit cigarettes is too high for criminal elements to ignore. Unless you dedicate enough money from the tax to fund law enforcement you are creating a profit center for criminals.
Alex Gauthier
01.23.2013
@alexg
I had no clue there existed a black market for counterfeit cigarettes. Perhaps one of the benefits of not smoking
Joshua Tucker
01.24.2013
YES
Claude Berry
01.24.2013
Sin tax? How about taxing alcohol at the same percentage.
Elise Hokman
01.24.2013
A pack here is 12.75. No more tax.
LB Price
01.24.2013
No. That is dumb.
Finnegans Opinions
01.24.2013
NO NEW TAXES!
Johnathan Lemons
01.24.2013
How many more taxes do we have to have? Unless you also also tax the new big killer, fast food, I say enough.
Trevor Bacquet
01.24.2013
no, not at this point. They’ve gone way too far with it.
Finnegans Opinions
01.24.2013
“The funds driven from this tobacco tax hike will, in turn, be used for college scholarships and financial aid.”
It’s for the CHILDREN! I call B.S.!!
Andrew Flynn
01.24.2013
i dont think another dollar will do anything to change it, especially for younger smokers who often have more disposable income.
Jonathan Rice
01.24.2013
Tax ‘em!
Carol Reinker-Gruber
01.24.2013
Make it $5!
Hudgens Tee
01.24.2013
No, no more taxes on groups that have no lobby power. We keep inventing new taxes and yet we are still hearing “we’re broke”. “No more taxes unless and until, it’s on the rich, that have fed at the FREE trough for over a decade now. If tobacco is SO bad, then BAN tobacco! We will not drink the BS Kool Aid any longer!
Adrian Lewis
01.24.2013
NO !
George Gribbin
01.24.2013
Why not $ 110.00?
Kevin Chulski
01.24.2013
They just went up a dollar, no more, thanks. Find other ways to pay for your bloat. I’m not even a smoker…
Christopher Hood
01.24.2013
I like how you and the cdc blame the companies and not the teenagers who participate in the peer pressure around them.
I would not support it. We lived a world where everyone needs a vice.
Gar Bailey
01.24.2013
A very small portion of the population rides motorcycles, and mortorcycles are dangerous, tax them. Wait I ride a motorcycle – scratch that.
I can think of all kinds of activites I don’t participate in and we should tax all of them because it’s moral to penalize nonconformity with theft.
Why not tax everyone who particpates in activities not enjoyed by at least, say, 75% of the population. Higher income tax on homosexuals, tax minority religious beliefs, tax La Crosse and Polo players. People who dye their hair abnormal colors are strange, tax them.
Oh and how about we penalize those who earn more than the mean income. (oh yeah we already do that).
Jenny Jo
01.25.2013
I agree with this. Stop charging sin taxes and using the funds to financially support people who deteriorate their health using products like alcohol or tobacco, or don’t take care of themselves by overeating and have to use hospitals because of heart attacks, diabetes or other obesity related diseases. Either tax all health risking activities, or tax none and stop paying for people’s health care. The latter would be preferable, since then you wouldn’t have to force mandatory insurance on people to steal from healthy ones who don’t use doctors or insurance to pay for all the obese and sickly ones.
People should have the freedom to use whatever products they choose, no matter how harmful, as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others, but at the same time, they should not be leeching off of everyone else because they can’t support themselves due to throwing their life away. Easiest and best solution is to get rid of freedom infringing taxes on “consumables the government doesn’t get lobbied to tax higher” and forcing purchasing of private corporation goods by the government. More freedom all around and no more problems with fascists trying to tell other people they can’t smoke, or eat a big mac, or drink that 3rd big gulp.
Patty Hunt
01.24.2013
No!
Anthony Byrd
01.24.2013
Yuuuuup!!
Linda Hower Melones
01.24.2013
If you want more tax revenue, legalize drugs, regulate them, and tax the heck out of them.
David P. Semak
01.24.2013
I don’t smoke but less taxes and leaner government should be our goal. No, to higher taxes of anything! It just encourages our government to ask for even more money.
Cynthia Satterfield
01.24.2013
I don’t care
Richard Oakley
01.24.2013
Sure why not.
Stormy Leigh
01.24.2013
The power to tax is the power to destroy.
All products should be taxed equally. Period.
Jeff Cordeiro
01.24.2013
hell no cigarettes already over eight bucks a pack let them tax alcohol
Aaron Ki Møller
01.24.2013
A dollar isn’t going to end anyone’s addiction to tobacco. This will only put poor people at an even higher disadvantage. Smoking isn’t something you can just stop because it’s too expensive.
Jeff Cordeiro
01.24.2013
tell u something already this govt. uses these illegal drugs already to make some pills
Jeff Cordeiro
01.24.2013
lower govt. pay from warehouse to congress to federal judges to fbi to cia etc
LB Price
01.24.2013
Have we mentioned taxing the churches yet? Do that instead.
James Dean
01.25.2013
Churches are non profit. I suppose you want to tax the Mosques, Temples, Shrines, atheist organizations, unions, politcal parties, the Red Cross and a gazillion other charities as well right? Or were you just being a bigot? Thought so…
Jeff Cordeiro
01.24.2013
get rid of govt.grants that r received by millionares do not allow relatives of govt. workers b allowed get grants . we really need to get rid of obombas whole cabinet
Jeff Cordeiro
01.24.2013
including Hillary Clinton especially
Joel Wesson
01.24.2013
no. we already did that.enough already.
Michael Snider
01.24.2013
Just tax the churches instead, and lower other taxes.
Joey Mulkerin
01.24.2013
tax the rich
Gil Sery
01.24.2013
I’d support a $2 hike. I look forward to the day when people have to give up smoking because they can no longer afford it. With all we know about its effects on one’s health, if you’re suicidal enough to smoke, then you deserve to have that choice taken away from you.
Joey Mulkerin
01.24.2013
i’m tired of regressive sin taxes, as a liberal I support taxing those at the top instead of trying to force one particular set of morals on the population.
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
Hell no! This taxation mentality has just created another criminal black market. We are supposed to be free to do what we want with our own bodies. The SCOTUS has already ruled that the 4th amendment gives us this. Haven’t we learned enough about prohibition? In any form, it will not work and it just makes criminals out of honest people.
Allison Waters
01.24.2013
Nope!
David Gerald
01.24.2013
Why tax tobacco for education…theres no connection. If it was for health care that would at least be some connection
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
Products should not be taxed period.
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
and that will do what?
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
What will it accomplish?
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
This is an example of social engineering. Throughout history it has NEVER worked.
Doug Marks
01.24.2013
If you taxed 100% of the top 5% income earners there still would not be enough money to feed our bloated government.
Grace Murray
01.24.2013
Thanks for the reality & sanity check Doug. These people are fools and uneducated by history. And listen to the liberal media propaganda.
Jonathan Rice
01.24.2013
Increased revenue for education.
Jeff Egan
01.24.2013
No. And I don’t even smoke.
Kate Swigonski
01.24.2013
If you smoke, especially for a long time, you are going to have health problems. If you expect me to help pay our medical bills, you can pay towrd it by this tax. I’d support this as long as the $ was only put into campaigns to eliminate smoking and for medical care.