Rand Paul Israel Tour Wraps Up as Ehud Barak Arrives in D.C.
By Shane Bond | 01/16/2013 | Issues, War and Foreign Policy | 24 Comments
Photo: Rand Paul Facebook Page
Republican congressman Rand Paul visited Israel to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, expressing his support for the Israeli state but also his reservations on American foreign aid to the Middle Eastern country. The visit is coming to a close just as Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak arrives in Washington today.
These political exchanges come during a period of concern for the Israeli government, as President Barack Obama considers former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel for Defense Secretary. Paul, thus far, has been unwilling to give his opinion on Hagel although the Republican Party is criticizing Hagel for not being a staunch enough friend of Israel. Hagel has said Congress needs to be wary of Israel’s sway over American politics and he has shown reluctance to support sanctions on Iran.
In 2010 Hagel even said he thought it possible for America to live with a nuclear armed Iran, just as America lived with a nuclear armed Soviet Union. But since Hagel’s nomination, a public official who met with Hagel said that he would fall in line with Obama’s tough stance on Iran, according to Los Angeles Times.
But Hagel’s appointment has stirred angst among right-wing Israeli politicians who favor strong American support for their country in the wake of the Iranian controversy. Israel has been verbally aggressive in addressing Iran’s nuclear program, declaring that the country is close to acquiring a nuclear weapon.
American intelligence released a report in 2011 declaring Iran was not actively seeking a nuclear weapon and that their uranium was at 20 percent enrichment. A nuclear weapon would require a 90 percent enrichment. The 2011 report stated what was already known in 2007, that Iran had abandoned pursuing a nuclear weapon in 2003 and had not sought to build one since then.
At a meeting with departing Defense Minister Leon Panetta in November, Barak said he believed the sanctions were “working,” but that they would not be enough to stop the country from building a nuclear bomb. This time, Barak’s visit with high-level security officials will likely address ongoing discussions about Iran and Syria.
America has been in conflict with the Iran since the former client state, headed by American ally, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was toppled by Islamist Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The blowback came nearly three decades after America orchestrated a coup d’état against democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddegh who sought to nationalize Iranian oil to eradicate British control over the valued resource.
During Gerald Ford’s presidential term, America’s position towards Iran’s nuclear ambitions was the opposite of today. Then, America supported Iran’s pursuit of nuclear energy and even worked to complete a deal that would have given Iran control of large quantities of plutonium and enriched uranium.
Rand Paul, much like his father and former presidential candidate, Ron Paul, has concerns about Iran but has separated himself from most of Congress on the issue. Although Senator Paul voted for sanctions against Iran recently, in 2012 he was the lone senator who voted against a joint resolution which included preventative war with Iran as an option to hinder the acquisition of a nuclear weapon.
Paul doesn’t stray far from his father’s libertarian principles, often proposing dramatic cuts to American foreign aid, including to Israel. He believes America has no place in involving itself in the settlement controversy in the West Bank or the Golan Heights.
Paul says that his opinion on drawing down foreign aid to Israel is little different than what Netanyahu said in 1996 in a speech to Congress, where he argued Israel should gradually wean itself off of American aid dollars. “The biggest threat to our nation right now is our debt,” Paul said to the Jerusalem Post, “This does mean that we have to reassess who to give aid to and when we do reassess that, I would begin with countries that are burning our flag and chanting ‘Death to America.’ No one is accusing of Israel of that.”
Paul’s week long visit to Israel is a likely indicator for a run for presidency in 2016 on a Republican tab. Paul’s father ran this past year, and despite a dedicated libertarian following, he received little support from the breadth of the Republican Party to get the nomination.





Leave Your Comment →
24 Comments
Lucas Eaves
01.16.2013
@lucaseaves
I actually like the idea of a US foreign policy that would be less incline to follow Israel in all its actions. I think that a weaker support by the US would lead Israel to be more careful and might avoid an escalation of tension with Iran.
Lucas Eaves
01.16.2013
@lucaseaves
also great article on the point where you explain the US complicated history with Iran. It is not always reminded.
Emma Goda
01.16.2013
@emmagoda
Do you think Rand Paul will run on a Republican ticket in 2016? I find that interesting.
Alex Gauthier
01.16.2013
@alexg
“a report in 2011 declaring Iran was not actively seeking a nuclear weapon and that their uranium was at 20 percent enrichment.” That report seems to have been largely ignored by those in the media with itchy trigger fingers
Carl Wicklander
01.16.2013
@carlwicklander
I’m cautiously optimistic that Rand Paul can represent an authentic alternative to what seems like a constant drive for war with Iran. His votes for sanctions concern me, but he seems to see them as an alternative, or middle way.
Jane Susskind
01.16.2013
@jsusskind
Yeah, I think that the growing debt means we should re-evaluate how we spend money, especially abroad.
Billy Hoff
01.16.2013
lets see how he does or keeps his word about his impeachment promice, doubt he can get it done just interested to see how hard he tries.
Jason Harsha
01.16.2013
Why is it that every candidate has to go to Israel first? Shouldn’t their loyalty be to the US and the US alone. Our entanglement with Israel (most likely religiously motivated) has brought us nothing but trouble.
Dorothy Svelmoe
01.16.2013
Not really.
Audra Conner
01.16.2013
If so, he will not win..
Love Freedom
01.16.2013
Rand’s loyalty to Israel has made him just like every other unAmerican blowhard in Washington claiming to be an American. He will not have my support. Not now. Not ever.
Sandi Stewart
01.16.2013
I like him, so far. Time will tell.
Trevor Britton
01.16.2013
let the fun begin. i hope the GOP hasn’t taken down their circus tent because they will have to put it back up…
Sandi Stewart
01.16.2013
Is there anyone out there that you guys think would make a good president in 2016? If so, who?
Jan Sutton Duren
01.16.2013
Another IDIOT steps forward!
Jeff Martin
01.16.2013
Boo!!!!!!!
Jeff Martin
01.16.2013
Hiss!!!!!!
Johnny Ritchie
01.16.2013
Not bright. Romney was brighter than this guy.
Trinda Martin-Wolfe
01.17.2013
I’m not impressed with his allegiance to Israel. Also not impressed with his endorsment of Romney. Love his dad, he is not his dad. Not the worst by any means, but he is not wooing me back to the GOP. Gary Johnson 2016.
Luke Enoch
01.17.2013
He is named after Ayn Rand…
Matthew Taylor
01.17.2013
Too crazy and doesn’t seem to have a core set of principles guiding him like his father does…just another Republican wannabe
Gerry Feldman
01.17.2013
Whether or not Rand Paul himself decides to run, the Republicans need to adopt Libertarian principles if they are going to stand a chance at taking the White House. The party of old rich white guys is doomed to failure.
Terria Hughes
01.17.2013
What a poor excuse for human being oh I guess that why he’s a polotician
Christopher Hood
01.17.2013
Of course. What senator goes to israel and it not vacation?