Priorities USA Funding Revealed in Recently Obtained Tax Filing
By Alex Gauthier | 01/10/2013 | Campaign Finance, Elections 2012, Electoral Reform, Headline, President | 15 Comments
Almost all of the donors for President Obama’s top Super PAC, Priorities USA Action, have been known since the FEC released their disclosure filing in December. Nearly $80 million in receipts have been recorded, with the top contributions of money behind Obamas reelection coming from Newsweb Corp, a Chicago based printing company, with $4.5 million and Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund management firm from New York, with $4 million.
Yet to be uncovered, however, are the organizations and individuals who contributed millions of dollars in undisclosed support to the Super PAC’s affiliate, Priorities USA. As a social welfare 501(c)4, Priorities USA is not required to disclose individuals, corporations or union organizations that have donated in an effort to affect the 2012 election. The Center for Responsive Politics obtained and published the organization’s only tax filing, a 990 Income Tax Exemption form with data from 2011. Though specific identities behind the Priorities USA funding were not disclosed, over 80% of Priorities’ 2011 revenue came from one, $1.9 million donation.
Priorities USA’s largest issue advocacy expense in 2011 and primary program service accomplishments, according to Part III of the 990 form, are two ads, totaling $722,000, supporting Obama’s positions on student loans, Pell Grants, and middle class tax rates. These ads were not reported to the FEC, in apparent violation of the ‘independent expenditure’ requirement regarding explicit endorsement/opposition of a candidate or party. The ads never aired on television, one of which can be seen below.
This raises questions as to why the group would spend almost a third of its $2.3 million of revenue for 2011, and dedicate over half of its yearly expenses, $1.2 million, to ads that almost no one saw.
The second largest expenditure was a $75,000 grant to American Bridge 21st Century, another social welfare 501(c)4 and affiliate of yet another Super PAC, American Bridge Super PAC. Needless to say, those behind the $75,000 who lent their support to David Brock’s (founder of Media Matters) Super PAC weren’t disclosed in the filing.
Last week Maryland Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen reintroduced the DISCLOSE Act as H.R. 148. The Act would unveil the identities of persons or organizations donating over $10,000 to political causes, even ‘social welfare’ 501(c)4’s like Priorities USA and Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS. An attempt last year by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) was filibustered by Senate Republicans.
Current regulations don’t require tax disclosures for 2012 to be filed until late in 2013, leaving everyone still guessing as to what exactly Priorities USA did during the election and how much money filtered through the group’s hands. Organizations like Priorities USA and Crossroads GPS are clearly not chomping at the bit to disclose their donors, consequently the only avenue to ensure greater disclosure requirements for election spending is legislation like the DISCLOSE Act.





Leave Your Comment →
15 Comments
Lucas Eaves
01.10.2013
@lucaseaves
I really do believe that the transparency requirements for these organization are way too low and i hope that a Disclose act will be passed before the next round of elections. But with both parties benefiting from this muddy waters, I ask not very optimistic.
Emma Goda
01.10.2013
@emmagoda
I think we should know who is donating to what.. especially specific corporations
Audra Conner
01.10.2013
YES!!! actually, super pacs ( citizens united ) shouldn’t exist!!!
Harry Balzac
01.10.2013
All this coming from the fraud who promised the most transparent administration ever? Shocking I tell you, …shocking.
Juan Oscar
01.10.2013
Good luck everything will maintain sealed and a mystery about Obama, the media does not want to vett him nor reveal what they already found out…
Juan Oscar
01.10.2013
I did hear that his campain 08″ got penalized like $200,000 or more for something…
Jonathan Campbell
01.10.2013
Haha, his name is ball sack!
Jonathan Campbell
01.10.2013
Hairy ball sack!
Steven Golnik
01.10.2013
We have the best government corporations can buy.
Bryan Whiteaker
01.10.2013
Our glorious leader railed against super lava in the senate, and then ok’d them later. I can’t imagine why, can you? ;)
Paul Sanders
01.10.2013
With this wonderful new law. A foreign country can buy or build a company. Donate to the presidency, and ultimately run it. This has opened the door for foreign invasion! Hmm, I wonder if china contributed. Berry sure has been bowing a lot in china!
Jenny Jo
01.11.2013
As if that has’nt happened already… Look at the donations list for presidential campaigns (both sides, they’re both owned by the same people). Notice anything? Most of them are large global conglomerates. Now look into the majority and large % share holders for those companies. Now look at how much they paid in taxes in the past decade.. if you are a glutton for punishment, take a gander at how much they paid in lobbying and political support, compared to their taxes. Sickening, isn’t it?
Carol Reinker-Gruber
01.10.2013
Oh, yes indeed!
Sean Campbell
01.11.2013
Yes, but transparency is not enough. Neither is a “corporations are not people” amendment. We need citizen-funded campaigns. Check out Prof. Lawrence Lessig’s http://www.rootstrikers.org if this is an important issue to you.
Donavan Spencer
01.11.2013
Yes to transparency