Georgia Congressman Rob Woodall Introduces FairTax
By Kelly Petty | 01/09/2013 | Budget, Legislation, Legislators, Taxes | 75 CommentsNot long after House members were sworn in last week, Georgia Representative Rob Woodall (R) introduced his first bill to establish the FairTax. House Republican, along with a record number of 53 other co-sponsors, are setting their sights on getting H.R. 25 passed during the 113th U.S. Congress.
“The momentum is building for fundamental tax reform and it’s fueled by the American people,” said Woodall in a press statement.
The goal of the FairTax is to replace various taxes—income, corporate, capital gains, estate, gift, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare, and self-employment taxes—with a single, national retail sales tax or “consumption tax”.
At a rate of 23 percent, taxpayers would receive a full paycheck and only pay taxes on new goods and services at the point-of-sale.
Woodall and other FairTax supporters see it as the best way to completely restructure and simplify the tax code, effectively “repeal and replace” the Sixteenth Amendment, and pull the government out of the business of tax collecting, resulting in the elimination of the IRS.
For others, the FairTax looks good on paper, but is a shot in the dark in terms of producing effective tax reform.
First off, the retail sales tax would be a federal tax, notwithstanding state and local sales taxes. At a rate of 23 percent, opponents argue that a typical household could see an inflated living budget as families would have to factor in the higher tax rate on basic necessities such as food, clothing, and gas since there is no guarantee that states would forgo their taxes in place of the single consumption tax.
Writing for the Libertarian political and economics think tank, Ludwig Von Mises Institute, Laurence M. Vance further surmises that H.R. 25 would shift tax collecting responsibility into the hands of ordinary businesses as they would have to collect—and report—taxes for each good and service.
According to Vance, this means doctors would charge taxes for their services, and small service businesses and internet companies that currently do not collect state sales taxes would be required to collect the federal sales tax. He sees this as a never-ending funnel for collecting money from taxpayers at every turn.
In the end, Vance believes the FairTax Act is not really “fair” and is “highway robbery” by the federal government.
He writes, “The solution is nothing less than a drastic reduction or wholesale elimination of its revenue source. What is fair about allowing the government to confiscate 23 percent of the value of every new good and service?”
Others are more concerned with the potential black market and possible tax evasion as people would find alternative ways to purchase items for less to bypass the higher tax rate. Rep. Woodall thinks otherwise:
“The beauty of the FairTax is that it effectively makes the underground economy taxable. The folks that operate underground will eventually have to come to the surface to buy milk and bread at the supermarket like the rest of us, and any profits they generate underground will become subject to the FairTax as soon as they walk to the cash register. When FairTax opponents start to worry about the underground milk and bread economy, I think we’ll know we’ve won the debate.”
Yet, the complexity of repealing the Sixteenth Amendment and eliminating the IRS may present some challenges and challenge the constitutionality of the bill.
In many conservative, libertarian, and anti-government circles, the idea of getting rid of the IRS and dismantling the Federal Reserve would serve as the ultimate triumph of the people over tyranny.
FairTax advocates see income taxes as debt collection rather than true revenue generated, as the money is used to pay off debt incurred from the Federal Reserve before it reaches any government programs. They also cite that the Sixteenth Amendment makes income taxes constitutional, which they see as a violation of Article 1, Section 9 of the constitution which details the limits on Congress to collect direct taxes.
The FairTax Act, according to Rep. Woodall, passes the test of both the Section 8, Enumerated Powers clause, and the Limits on Congress clause in Section 9 of Article 1 in the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, it should not face any court opposition. He states that it is an excise tax uniformly applied throughout the nation and it does not tax exports.
Retired representative John Linder, who held Congressman Woodall’s seat for almost 20 years, has been a leader in the FairTax movement for the last couple of years. He wrote The FairTax Book with radio talk show host Neal Boortz, which is one of the first books written on the tax reform.
Linder has put full support behind the measure and looks to Woodall and other young representatives to make the FairTax happen.
Woodall believes the FairTax is the best path to follow on the road to economic prosperity and job security for the future.
“The FairTax addresses so many of the challenges Americans face today,” he said. “We can restore America as the primary destination of jobs and investment from around world.”






Leave Your Comment →
75 Comments
nocashdav
01.09.2013
it would kill the elderly on s.s .
Alex Gauthier
01.09.2013
@alexg
how so?
Adam Luke
01.09.2013
@adamluke
Most likely Elderly would be affected greatly because of daily opperating costs shooting up 23%, I understand that grocieries, medicine and fuel greatly impact those on S.S. Most of the time these necessities account for a large majority of their monthly expenses. You jump a grocery bill 50 bucks, or GAS another 50 a month and you are quickly going to burn through any S.S funds a person may have.
Kelly Petty
01.09.2013
@kpetty1
Great answer Adam. I also thought about the fact that currently Social Security is collected from your wages, but with Fair Tax that is eliminated. If that is the case, it would seem as proponents say, that Fair Tax would basically dissolve Social Security, unless the 23 percent brings in enough revenue that when divided amongst national programs, Social Security would get an adequate share. This deserves a follow up.
Joel Hadley
01.11.2013
@joelhadley
That would be a good thing! Managing retirement, insurance, and healthcare are not enumerated to the federal government at all in the constitution (and they have proven vastly inept at trying to). If there is truly a problem with one of these economic sectors somewhere, let the local or state governments handle it!
Beverly Martin
01.26.2013
Adam and rest – read the bill before posting an uneducated opinion. Look at my post listing the prebate available to everybody who has a social security number. Someone said they couldn’t support the bill because Neal Boortz wrote the book. Well, if you took time to read Neal’s book, you would know he wrote the book with full footnotes and reasearch noted. Don’t like Neal? Try reading Ken Hoagland’s The FairTax Solution. As for the bill being too complicated and needing more answer, that comment shows someone has not read the bill. It clearly explains how it would be implemented. As for Kelly’s comment about Social Security, remember that currently the work force is shrinking. How does that play out for Social Security or any other government program? In 2009, the FairTax would have generated $171 billion more revenues than the IRS revenues and in 2010, $265billion more! (David Tuerck, Chairman of the Economics Department and Executive Director of the Beacon Hill Institute). Those revenues would have gone a long way to pay down debt and to reduce the tendency of the Federal Reserves to flood the market with money.Had the FairTax been in place since 2007, by 2011 our GDP would have been increased by 10.7%, Employment by 9.9%, and Real Wages by 10.2%. (The Economic Effects of the FairTax: Results from the Beacon Hill Institute CGE Model)
Learn more at http://www.fairtax.org and then demand your congressman cosponsor HR25 /S122.
Joel Hadley
01.11.2013
@joelhadley
Not necessarily, but it’s an easy fix either way. Just exempt anyone receiving Social Security from having to pay the tax.
Adam Luke
01.09.2013
@adamluke
Good on paper, but completely misses the mark. How is it that Russia has a more simple and understanding tax code then America? How often do we hear about the “commies” but then our own tax code looks like a calculator glued to a bear trap? The facts are simple. The average grociery bill for a family is at or well above 250 dollars every 2 weeks. A 23% tax on just 250 dollars worth of “milk and bread” would ATLEAST be another 50 dollars out of pocket for that family. Even removing income tax, and payroll tax, etc. the money “saved in pocket” is quickly shoveled right out… Again, Lets mandate a simple 13-19% flat tax to our TAX code and THEN we can maybe call it a FAIRtax.
Jenny Jo
01.11.2013
Russia has a simpler and easier to understand tax code because the people who live there know how to educate themselves on something before speaking against it and spewing misinformation.
You can go to the Fairtax website and read it yourself if you are able, because it clearly states that grocery bills, gas and necessities are excluded from being taxed. Yep, that’s right.. its a consumption tax. You want people taxed based on what they own? Rich people will be taxed on everything they spend, with no loopholes, and people who can’t hardly afford groceries pay nothing. Easy isn’t it? How hard is this to figure out. If you spend 10 grand on a car, you’d be taxed ~1500$ at a 15% tax rate. If they buy a new 100k car every year, thats an extra 15 grand they weren’t paying before, and seems more than acceptable proportionally. Someone who buys a 100 million dollar yacht will be taxed 15 million.. FIFTEEN MILLION! I’d say retrieving more tax funds in one wealthy person’s purchase, than they have paid in the last decade, is a good tax plan. Coupled with elimination of the loopholes and the prebate support for people under a certain threshhold, and we are looking at starting to pay down some of our national debt.
b mutia
01.09.2013
If I live offgrid and be sustanable, then, there is a good chance I will not owe anybody.
Amerigo M. Cimino
01.09.2013
“Georgia Congressman Rob Woodall Introduces FairTax”
GOD Bless you Congressman Rob Woodall!!
I hope you get the support of Congress!
Henry Salo
01.25.2013
@henry_salo
The Republican Party is only for the rich. Look at the people who are behind this so called Fair Tax. They’re all rich. Texas billionaire Leo Linbeck is the founder and head of Fair Tax.org. Fair Tax taxes food, clothing, rent, housing, buying a new car, buying a new house, interest on mortgages, utilities, medical procedures, doctor visits, hospital stays, gas will be taxed 3 times ( Fair Tax, Fed. gas tax and State gas tax, expect a dollar more over existing prices) and so much more. Those rebates wouldn’t cover a third of this. The rebates: It will cost the Fed. government between $400 to $700 billion a year to process an d send out the rebates, making it the largest entitlement ever. The IRS? They say it will eliminate the IRS but it will add 3 Bureaucracies in its place. This tax system is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Never trust a Republican.
John McMillen
01.29.2013
Henry, I think you’re incorrect on several points. 1.) Only the Rich support or are behind the Fairtax concept? It may be true that Leo Linebeck and several other people who had the money to expend, put up over 20 Million dollars of their own money to fund research from independent economists to come up with a viable and equitable tax plan to replace the evil, corrupt, and idiotic income tax system that is now holding not only American business, buy the working man, and our intire U.S. economy hostage and is draining all an unconscionable amount of American productivity into a swamp in Washingto D.C. appropiately nick named “Foggy Bottom.” However, hundreds and thousands or regular working middle class tax payers like myself have studied this plan inside and out, and afterwards become strong proponents of it. If you will take the time to do your own honest analysis, and not just regufitate opponents erroneous talking points as you have here, you will be doing yourself, your family and your country a great favor. 2.) You name off all the things we will pay tax on, but you fail to substract all the taxes that are built into those same items right now under the income tax system, that are being passed on in the retail price we consumers pay. Corporations and business may wright a check to the IRS, but the amount of business taxes they pay and the cost of record keeping, and paying to file income tax is all passed on to you and me, the consumer. When you take that out, and apply the Fairtax rate, it’s pretty much a wash and your back to the same retail price. (I notice you failed to inform us that all “used cars” and all “pre-owned houses” and all other “used items” will not be taxed by the Fairtax rate.) 3.) You also falsly state gas prices will be affected. Gas and Diesel already have an excise tax. NO FAIRTAX will be added to excise taxed items. You are misleading the folks. 4.) The eligibility for the pre-bate amount is already easily set by the current Health and Humane sercies department’s scale on Poverty levels according to household size. No new bureacacy needed here. 5.) The prebate checks can be written by the same automated machines from the already instituted government check writting departments already set up. No new bureacacy needed here. We can reassign the current IRS staff to become investigators and auditors of the current social security and medicare programs that are riffed with fraud and abuse. That would be another net increase in revenue in and of itself. You are wrong on almost everything you wrote. You are a false witness bearer in an intellectual’s clothing. I should say, “I wouldn’t trust anyone named Henry” after reading your false accusations and assertions. But then that would be “Fair” to eveybody now, would it?
Amerigo M. Cimino
01.09.2013
The Fair Tax;is a SIMPLE TRANSPARENT way of collecting taxes!
It would replace the 60,000 or 70,000,p[lus pages of the FEDERAL income tax code!
There will be NO bookkeepping!
All bookkeepping will be done by the retailer and the Service provider!
The Fair Tax has nothing to do with State taxes; those will remain!
The Fair Tax would eliminate many Federal jobs!
Our Federal government will become less expensive!
We could start paying off out National Debt!
There will be NO need for “Stimulus”!!
How about that for a plan?
GOD; Bless America.
In GOD We Trust! (That could go back on our currency)!
Henry Salo
01.25.2013
@henry_salo
I wouldn’t trust a tax system that is written in a book from a radio talk jock.
Dean Klein
01.09.2013
My parents pay 21% between federal and state in California, I’m against anything that makes the rest of the country like california in any way. lower that to 15-17% and we’ll talk
John Vasilakis
01.09.2013
This is a far better system than the one we are currently using. It would eliminate the need for the IRS and absolutely simplify the tax code. With the elimination of corporate and payroll taxes and the like, companies would not need to ship jobs overseas in order to make a profit. Nobody would be able to evade paying their taxes due to it being a consumption tax, even those in this country illegally. Don’t get me wrong, all taxation is theft, but this is a far better way to go about it.
Gail Lessard
01.09.2013
Does that cover city, state and federal? If not then I say no!
Kelly Petty
01.09.2013
@kpetty1
Gail, Fair Tax would in its current form does not address city and state taxes; those would remain as they are decided by those respective governments. FairTax only replaces all federal taxes with a national sales tax that you would see when you make a purchase on a new good like a new shirt or car.
Dada Kolawole Mathew Babaoye
01.09.2013
Asinine!
Karen VanWinkle
01.09.2013
Stupid idea, won’t work
Jason Harsha
01.09.2013
Apparently, Woodall doesn’t know that we lowly peons pay for local services as well with our taxes.
John Vasilakis
01.09.2013
No Gail, it would replace the current federal taxes only. It’s not a flat 23% tax, that’s misleading. Here’s their website if you’d like more info http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage2
Kelly Petty
01.09.2013
@kpetty1
John, thanks for your comment. As I explained in the article, Congressman Woodall only wants to eliminate the tedious process of filing yearly taxes with a system that taxes a person at the consumer level through point-of-sale purchases. Basically, taxes would be collected on new (not used) goods and services only, not pulled out of everyone’s paycheck, as well as collecting using the complicated tax bracket we currently have.
Carol Michaels
01.09.2013
It’s only on goods and services….not your paycheck.
Evelyn Billington
01.09.2013
most poeple do not pay a 23% tax, they pay less like us. A 23% would hurt those who need a taxbreak the most and let the ueberrich off the hook yet once again. I would close all the loopholes in the first place and maybe come up with a three tiered rate. 15% rate for incomes less then $50,000, 20% for anyone making $50,000 to $150,000 and 25% for anyone over that. All income sources are taxed at the same rate according to your income (capital gains, investment, foreign bank accounts, etc)
John Vasilakis
01.09.2013
You guys are making assumptions without actually reading the ins and outs of the tax. Educate yourself before forming an opinion.
George Dana Johnson
01.09.2013
Fantastic!! Even the government would have a lot more money, It would cut out the graft and corruption.
John Pierce
01.09.2013
We are all paying about 22% in taxes right now on everything we purchase. Every company in the manufacturing chain to the finished product at the store pays taxes, pays half of social security(payroll taxes) for their employees, also the cost of accountants to figure the taxes, these are called embedded taxes and they are passed to us in the cost of the product. These will mostly go away with the FairTax. As far as state taxes go, this is a Federal collection system only, nothing to do with state collecting their taxes.
Doug Marks
01.09.2013
and mortgage interest, loan interest, credit card interest, doctor bills, ALL services that are currently tax free, Dr bills, prescriptions, and the list goes on.
Until there are real spending cuts this is just another revenue stream with NO caps.
AND the 23% is the way it is presented but it will actually be 30%. It depends on how you look at the math. Plus the prebate is just redistribution, more of the same crap.
John Pierce
01.09.2013
Karen, you are self employed, what is stupid if you no longer had to pay income tax?
Skny John
01.09.2013
Single-rate taxes & sales taxes are flat taxes, period, & flat taxes tax the poor more than the rich.
Gail Lessard
01.09.2013
At 30K a year, I pay about 10% federal. Not exactly sure on AL state tax and 1% city. Then there is already almost 10% tax on goods and services.
John Pierce
01.09.2013
support your assertion
Davis Jackson
01.09.2013
Many of you seem to think the rich owe the government most of their money for some reason. If the government would cut back on their maniacal obsession with spending, maybe we wouldn’t need to raise taxes on anyone, including the rich.
Alex Gauthier
01.09.2013
Fair Tax is an interesting concept but I too share your view that it really wouldnt solve the problem of generating the kind of revenue necessary for an industrialized nation to provide adequate services for its people. awesome profile picture btw.
Kelly Petty
01.09.2013
@kpetty1
Thanks Alex. I like the idea too,but there seems to be too many questions that need to be answered before most people would give the plan a definitive yes.
Judy Ferro
01.09.2013
No. This penalizes those who must spend everything they make to stay alive and leaves the billionaires paying relatively little tax. Moreover, it provides an incentive not to buy things or to participate in a black market. Poor economics from every angle except the uber-riches.
Dan W
01.11.2013
Please at least READ the suggestion. There is a prebate, and necessities to live are not taxed at all.
Mike Smith
01.09.2013
A consumption tax in lieu of payroll tax is ok with me, but it shouldn’t be more than 15%.
Christopher Smith
01.09.2013
25% is what we charge for total overhead, for services now. At that rate Government better also take responsibility for all of my liabilities and I businesses don’t have to pay anything, just go produce. Then people could just sue the Government instead of me.
Steve Stratton
01.09.2013
Fair tax is nothing new, it’s just a new name for the Value Added Tax (VAT) that’s been tried in various European countries and was first suggested in the US back in the 60′s. Actually increases taxes!
Steve Stratton
01.09.2013
Why not go back to the original 10% income tax on all income for everyone, no exceptions, deductions, loopholes or exclusions!!!
Ulfr Dokkr
01.09.2013
Wasn’t it Jefferson that said something to the effect of, The government should be able to live off a 10% sales tax and never need more. Wth happened to that?
Dan W
01.11.2013
O please don’t mention anything like this, you will bring them out of the woodwork… There are those on this site, who are naive enough to think human nature has changed in 200 years, and that our forefathers were delusional and stupid, and we could never need things like rights, privacy, weapons to defend ourselves, and the ability to control our governments spending and law creation in 2012.. I mean.. those things are all so 1775! Get with the times man, it is time to “progress” and the forefathers could have never imagined modern society, so we have to change everything! …..Yeah, corruption could never happen in 2012, the congress is too busy watching American Idol to conspire or steal from the American people! …O wait
Don Murphy
01.09.2013
If it is a consumption/sales tax it is by its nature regressive – the poor spend the largest proportion of their income on new goods and services and therefore the highest effective tax rate. while the richest spend the lowest proportion of their income on new goods and services and therefore pay the lowest effective rate. This is not a good plan to reverse the trend over the past few decades of the rich getting richer and the poor and middle class getting poorer. We don’t need to eliminate either the rich or the poor to have a thriving economy, but matching CEO compensation at growing multiples of worker wages to a steadily declining purchase power for the 98% is not the answer either.
Dan W
01.11.2013
Except there is a prebate so that the poor spend literally nothing on the goods they need to live. Please at least read things before spewing misinformation.
It’s blatantly obvious that most people do not even read the content of articles or such posted, since they go and spew garbage that was covered on the first page of links included, so we should probably just ignore posters like this since they are 1) uneducated on the subject, 2) blatantly intellectually dishonest, for stating things as facts that are merely hearsay, their opinion, or what they heard from their sheeple friends, and 3) unable to even verify basic maths.
Fairtax forced rich people to either pay what they owe, or sit on their money. They aren’t going to be living a very luxurious life here sitting on their money not buying anything. Rich people buy houses all the time, cars, boats, toys etc. I think I’ll take 20% taxes on the millions and millions they spend on luxury goods, than 10% tax on the fraction of their income that they aren’t able to effectively hide overseas, thanks.
Henry Salo
01.25.2013
@henry_salo
Rich people buy houses, cars, boats, toys, etc? The rich won’t buy them, their corporations will buy them as business expenses. Read the Fair Tax plan. Corporations and farms are exempted from the so called Fair Tax. The rich mostly inherit their estates from their elders. Don’t forget, under the Fair Tax, there is no inheritance tax. The rich covered their tracks very well. It is the middle class that is going to pay this tax.
Edward Theilmann
01.09.2013
It screws the poor and lower middle class while benefiting the well off and rich.With a tax like this the poor pay a huge percent of what they earn in taxes while the rich pay almost nothing
Steven Breedlove
01.09.2013
Here’s something not yet discussed. A carbon tax. Now that is a true flat tax. Stepped up over 10 years; 2%, 4% and so on every two years. While the poor may feel it a little at first, the rich have much, much higher carbon footprints. It’s a consumption tax that doesn’t tax needed services all that much. If the very poor take buses etc anyway, they’d escape most of the burden. Thae added benefits would be immense, stimulating infrastructure and efficiency investments, reducing health care costs through less pollution and localized food production. Etc.
And to the person who thinks the rich already pay too much, let me ask you this. Do you prefer peace to conflict? Because inequality is the grounds for an uprising. If you like things mostly the way they are, you should advocate for policy that reduces income disparity.
Brian Myers
01.09.2013
Has to cover all taxes including federal -state and city and not count on Groceries, water, electricity. Other then that I would be ok, but still a tad bit high.
Brian Myers
01.09.2013
How about we focus on how the government spends way…way.way to much. Also enforce the laws on the books – like borders – like congress can not pass a bill/law that they are excluded from – which surprisingly is a lot of them.
Scotty Mcwilliams
01.09.2013
No!
Korry Tessen
01.09.2013
Its a great idea and a world class tax system like this is much overdue to bring out nation back to prosperity instead of poverty. We are the modern day Rome falling fast from our peak of greatness…
Matthew Graham
01.09.2013
As a single male with no children in the U.S. I pay signifigantly more than 23% in taxes and I don’t even make 6 figures. I would welcome something like this because I don’t need to buy a bunch of material crap and if I chose to then I would pay a higher tax on it, rather than just have my income stolen from me because I work. I think it would probably be bad for the small amount of free market that we have because people would buy less. Then again,we shouldn’t be a countrythat just sells material goods to each other that are made elsewhere anyway. Maybe if this country started producing something that was worth buying…..
Audra Conner
01.09.2013
NO!!!!
Christopher Smith
01.09.2013
Who do you think pays all of their taxes now? US. It is called the price you pay for every product and service you use. Inflation only accounts for between 50-60% of the rise in prices. The rest is taxes and regulations passed onto the consumer. Those companies that can not convince consumers to buy their products for a higher price have had to close down. As for the consumer they are forced by the GOVERNMENT to pay more for the products they need like basic foods, services, and energy.
Kim Renae Raeder- Erbacher
01.10.2013
Horrible! As the article said “a never ending funnel to collect tax at every turn”. Do the math, think about it, doctors, Internet, EVERY necessity taxed on TOP of taxe(state). No relief for property tax deductions. Nothing. Just taxing the hell out of Everything!
Patty Hunt
01.10.2013
No way Jack!
Tyler Rasmussen
01.10.2013
Finally some fresh ideas!
Caldwell Kelley
01.10.2013
Except for the corporate subsidies, Favors from a privately owned Fed, Use of a US military (See SD Butler “War is a Racket”) You’re right!
Marty Russell Hade
01.10.2013
No. From 15-23%? Definitely not.
Sandi Stewart
01.10.2013
Wouldn’t that also encourage recycling, since it’s only a tax on NEW goods.
Kelly Petty
01.10.2013
@kpetty1
Yes, Sandi, that is one of the positives that pro-Fair Tax advocates have stated that would make it appealing, especially to those who aren’t traditionally conservative, but want to see more emphasis on reduce, reuse, recycle.
Amerigo M. Cimino
01.11.2013
To; Dan W.
YOU should do some research before you comment!
I read your letter; and I thought the Imposter had written it!
You obviously, cannot understand “simple”!
Better luck next time!
Dan W
01.11.2013
Excuse me? This makes no sense.. It is not even in reply to one of my comments, so I am unsure of what you are referring to.
Let’s look at your comment Amerigo M Cimino… Flamebaiting? Check. Obtuse? Check. Trolling? Check. Insulting/degrading? Check.. Looks to me like you have nothing important to say so you resorted to personal attacks and red herrings.
I also am in the same position you are, on the issue, based on your comment above, and support the Fairtax, as well as ending corrupt politicians ability to raise rates arbitrarily to fund their pet projects… so I am not sure where the miscommunication or misunderstanding is, but o well.
Joel Hadley
01.11.2013
@joelhadley
I think the FairTax is a much better idea than the income tax. Really I would like to see the elimination of the income tax, the IRS, the Federal Reserve, and an end to the government monopoly on currency (which seems like a better monetary policy than even the gold standard). However, I don’t like the idea of any tax rate being in the double-digits, federal or state. Ultimately, I would like to see all taxation ended, as I do not believe using force to take the property of others is moral.
amerigom
01.12.2013
Joel Hadley; here is no need to exempt anyone from the Fair Tax;
The Fair Tax is just that!
FAIR, Period!
And it would be the end of taxing, by the Federal Government!
Many committees would be unnecessary, and our Govenment could be cut down to Managable!
Think of all the trees that could be saved; Paperwork will be uncecessary, and no record-keeping would be needed!
Don’t complicate perfection!
Robert Beauchamp
01.14.2013
This is not a new idea. One of its major flaws is that it shifts the greater tax burden from those who can most afford to pay taxes onto the backs of those who can least afford them. Enough people consider this to be a sadistic attack on those of lesser means to make the idea politically unfeasible. The various simple solutions seem to have multiple such flaws. The much more difficult and effective course would be to set about gradually reforming the code to eliminate most deductions, phased in over a decade or longer so as to allow people to adjust their financial lives.
amerigom
01.15.2013
Robert Beauchamp;
Are you an elected officioal?
Your rhetoric, gives you away!
Do you know ANYTHING about the Fair Tax?
John Collet
01.23.2013
One of the great benefits of the FairTax that was not mentioned in the artical is the “prebate” This is a monthly prepayment of the FairTaxes that will be paid on purchases up to the amount of that person’s poverty level. This assures that no one will pay taxes on necessities. Therefore the FairTax is really a tax on discressionary spending. This provision ensures that big spenders pay more than the frugal making it a progressive tax. Check it all out at fairtax.org. The more you learn the better you will like it.
Beverly Martin
01.24.2013
“Fiscal Federalism: The National FiarTax and the States”,a study by Dr. David Guerck of Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University studies the benefits the FairTax offers to states. Both the state and retailers would be paid to administer the program.45 states already collect sales taxes. The simplicity of the FairTax would encourage states to align their tax system with the federal government by enacting a revenue-neutral state FairTax. Currently Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Louisiana and Tennessee are in a battle to reform their tax codes to attract businesses and create economic growth. The states with tax codes most resembling the FairTax are winning as businesses flock to no-income tax states.
Although the proposed rate is 23%, that rate is offset by the ending of federal payroll deductions, a rebate to ensure no American pays federal taxes on spending up to the poverty level, and the elimination of hidden taxes now embedded in the cost of every purchase as corporations pass on their compliance costs to consumers.
No longer would families endure the agony or cost of preparing for tax day. Taxes are paid at the cash register. Businesses that serve other businesses will neither collect nor pay taxes since business-to-business purchases are exempt. The only individuals that would have to file tax returns are the self-employed who provide goods and services for final consumption.. The FairTax reduces the more than 700 incomprehensible sections of the Internal Revenue Code to one simple question. As all goods and services for final consumption are taxable, the retailer need answer only “how much did I sell to consumers?”
The FairTax would make Americans again able to compete in global markets. Currently, our tax code drives businesses, people, and investment money out of the country. Money that should have been available for investment in the USA sits in banks providing benefits for other nations while Americans see their economy evaporate.
The FairTax also has the advantage that the rate cannot be raised unless 2/3 of both the House and Senate vote to do so.
The FairTax removes the corruption of the current tax structure in which lobbyist, Congressmen and wealthy individuals work together to create loopholes that pass on the loss of revenue to the ordinary citizen who can’t afford K Street lobbyist while campaign coffers grow, and lobbyist get richer.
Finally, the FairTax calls for the repeal of the 16th Amendment thus ending the evil income tax. Karl Marx in his Communist Manifesto called for the use of a progressive income tax as the second plank in his platform for destroying capitalism.
The FairTax deserves to come out of the House Ways and Means Committee. Urge your congressmen and women to cosponsor the FairTax HR25. Let Americans – not the rich and powerful- decide how and when they will give their wealth to this government.
Beverly Martin
01.24.2013
@beverly_martin
The Prebate Benefits ALL Americans.Each family receives a
monthly prebate check that ensures no family pays taxes on spending
up to the poverty level. The prebate is based on family size.To qualify, each family member must have a social security number. The prebate monthly reimbursment is as follows:
1 adult $214 2 adults $424
1 adult and 1 child $290 2 adults and 1 child $504
1 adult and 2 children $366 2 adults and 2 children $580
1 adult and 3 children $442 2 adults and 3 children $656
1 adult and 4 children $518 2 adults and 4 children $732
1 adult and 5 children $594 2 adults and 5 children $808
1 adult and 6 children $669 2 adults and 6 children $884
1 adult and 7 children $745
Beverly Martin
01.24.2013
@beverly_martin
The Prebate Benefits ALL Americans.Each family receives a
monthly prebate check that ensures no family pays taxes on spending
up to the poverty level. The prebate is based on family size.To qualify, each family member must have a social security number. The prebate monthly reimbursment is as follows:
1 adult $214 2 adults $424
1 adult and 1 child $290 2 adults and 1 child $504
1 adult and 2 children $366 2 adults and 2 children $580
1 adult and 3 children $442 2 adults and 3 children $656
1 adult and 4 children $518 2 adults and 4 children $732
1 adult and 5 children $594 2 adults and 5 children $808
1 adult and 6 children $669 2 adults and 6 children $884
1 adult and 7 children $745
The FairTax, a national sales tax, would have collected far more
federal revenue in 2009 and 2010 than the current income tax based system.
The estimates demonstrate that FairTax-generated revenues for 2009 would have
been $171 billion more than the IRS revenue and in 2010; the FairTax would have
generated $267 billion more.
AFFT provided the data to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction
The estimates were provided by David Tuerck, Chairman of the Economics
Department and Executive Director of the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk
University in Boston.
“Because revenues from a consumption tax are always more stable over the
business cycle than revenues from an income tax, it stands to reason that the
FairTax would have reduced the deficit in recent years, had it been in place,” said
Tuerck.
Amerigo M. Cimino
01.26.2013
@amerigom
Rob Woodall; YOU got this right!
The Fair Tax is overdue!
It’s the ONLY plan that treats every taxpayer; equally!
NO Favorites; No loopholes; and best of all; no INCOME TAX!