Mexico Reacts to Legalization of Marijuana in US States
By Blaz Gutierrez | 11/09/2012 | Ballot Initiatives, Drugs, Elections 2012, Headline, President | 22 Comments
The chief of the Mexican president-elect’s transition team, Luis Videgaray, has confirmed a meeting between Enrique Peña Nieto and President Barack Obama. Peña Nieto was elected in July and will take office on December 1. Likely topics of conversation will include the legalization of marijuana in the context of the drug war in Mexico and immigration reform.
The leaders will meet on November 27 in Washington, DC and, although an official agenda has not been released, it is likely that the new Mexican president will use the opportunity to propose renewed efforts to combat drug trafficking. The fight against drug cartels has eluded outgoing Mexican President Felipe Calderon and has claimed the lives of more than 60,000 people during Calderon’s six year term.
Luis Videgaray, as well as other high-level politicians, have taken notice of the recent changes in US law concerning marijuana regulation.
In a radio interview in Mexico City, Videgaray stated “Obviously, we can’t handle a product that is illegal in Mexico, trying to stop its transfer to the United States, when in the United States, at least in part of the United States, it now has a different status. I believe this obliges us to think the relationship in regards to security … This is an unforeseen element.”
Echoing the concern to undermine the drug trade, the Governor of the Mexican State of Chihuahua, Cesar Duarte stated:
“It seems to me that we should move to authorize exports. We would therefore propose organizing production for export, and with it no longer being illegal, we would have control over a business which today is run by criminals. And which finances criminals.”
Peña Nieto has said that he is against a wholesale national legalization of marijuana, but shortly after his election stated that he would be open to debating the issue.
A study by a Mexican think tank estimated that legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington represents over $3 billion worth of the drug trade. Much of that study is presumed, however, upon the assumptions that consumers would opt for cheaper, domestically grown marijuana and that the US government would not aggressively investigate and prosecute movement of marijuana out of a state where it’s legal.
For its part, the US Justice Department has released a statement on the new Colorado and Washington laws saying:
“The department’s enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act remains unchanged. In enacting the Controlled Substances Act, Congress determined that marijuana is a Schedule 1 controlled substance. We are reviewing the ballot initiatives and have no additional comment at this time.”
The Obama administration was vocal in its efforts to halt a similar, although failed, attempt to fully legalize marijuana consumption. Attorney General Eric Holder has actively enforced federal law in California, filing court papers to seize properties rented to medical marijuana sellers and threatening to shut down sixty-seven dispensaries in Los Angeles alone.
Responses from local US political leaders on Mexico’s efforts to address the drug trade have been mixed. In 2006, when Mexico City began its own discussions to legalize drugs as a form of undermining the economics of the drug trade, then Mayor of San Diego, Jerry Sanders called the law, “appallingly stupid, reckless and incredibly dangerous,” and added “I view this as a hostile action by a longtime ally of the U.S.”
The United States and Mexico have mutual concerns as drug use has increased in both countries. And it may be that the legalization of marijuana may only pave the way for other illicit drug trade. According to a 2010 US government survey, marijuana was the most commonly used drug in the US, with more than 17 million users in 2010, 3 million more than in 2007. Cocaine usage is on a steady decline in the US, however, one and a half million people still consumed the drug in 2010.
Mexican use of cocaine has risen in the past few years, signaling that perhaps the drug war will continue, but shift towards battles over the import and export a different consumable.
The incoming President of Mexico’s policy with respect to combating narco trafficking is markedly different than his predecessor. He opposes the presence of US troops in Mexico, opting instead to continue drone strikes and counter-intelligence operations so long as they are carried out by Mexican troops. Also in contrast to Calderon, rather than attempting to dismantle drug organizations from the top-down, he has stated that the focus of his administration’s security apparatus would be to curb street-level violence rather than arresting and killing top drug traffickers and carrying out drug seizures heading to the world’s largest drug consumer, the United States.






Leave Your Comment →
22 Comments
Malcolm Kyle
11.10.2012
@Malcolm Kyle
Prohibition has finally run its course: Our prisons are full, our economy is in ruins, the lives and livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans have been destroyed or severely disrupted. What was once a shining beacon of liberty and prosperity has become a toxic, repressive, smoldering heap of hypocrisy and a gross affront to fundamental human decency.
Former and present Prohibitionists shall not be allowed to remain untainted and untouched by the unconscionable acts that they have viciously committed on their fellow citizens. They have provided us with neither safe communities nor safe streets. We will provide them with neither a safe haven to enjoy their ill-gotten gains nor the liberty to repeat such a similar atrocity.
Mel White
11.10.2012
Hard to have a war when there are no enemies…..
Susan Jefferson
11.10.2012
Calderon (the former president) used to say that if we legalize marijuana in the U.S. … it would be too confusing to the Mexican citizens … because it is not legal in Mexico … and that they would then want to grow it to sell to the U.S., which would cause a lot of problems. ….. What??? More than Mexico already has now? LOL I find that hard to believe and preposterous. Truth is … it would cut into their profits.
Patrick McNulty
11.10.2012
It’s the first positive step taken in the “drug war” since it began..
Desireah Davis
11.10.2012
i think it should b legal everywhere its the one thing god grows that u dont have to change to make a drug u plant it pick it dry it smoke it helps cancer paticents helps ppl who dont eat help s ppl w/ ptsd n sleepin prob but this is not a drug man has to alter to get u high there for should b legal all over the world every otherdrug should stay banned cuz they r altered to make them to b used to get high n i dont think it will hurt anyone profits just all n how u sell it u can always import xport thing just like we do other things we trade with other countries or buy from them LEGALIZIN THIS WAS THE BEST IDEA N HAS NEEDED TO B FOR A LONG TIME I THIS WEED SHOULD B LEGAL EVERYWHERE N BOOZE BANNED NO ONE DIE FROM SMOOKIN WEED BUT HUNDERDS DIE EVERY YEAR DUE TO PPL DRINKING B IT DRIVING WHILE DRUNK OR WHEN DRUNK HURTIN PPL CUZ UR A DRUNKIN LOSER HEY N I KNOW A FEW OF THEM BOOZE IS BAD TO PPL THAT CANT CONTROL N DRINK SAFELY N RESPONSEABLE THEY DO DUMB STUPID SHYT THATS NOT KOOL
Michael Snider
11.10.2012
It’s the first step towards drug peace. It will do wonders for the economies of both the US and Mexico (and of other countries). While it will not wipe out the cartels, it will mean they’ll take a big hit financially speaking and they’ll suffer massive losses.There will be less violence.
Jesse Banke
11.10.2012
There problem is Cocaine, Marijuana isn’t the reason why they have 60,000 deaths. The classification of Marijuana in relation to Cocaine is wrong, like comparing apples and wrenches.
Peter Piper
11.10.2012
Pople are already voting with their feet: Legalize all drugs. There won’t be a war and we can tax them.
Christopher N-Nicki Fullerton
11.10.2012
It’s illegal in the vast majority of countries around the world and it is still illegal under federal law….. so the States have to contend with a lot more than just passing a law in their own location; a few states passing laws so far hasn’t reduced the criminal elements there so why should this make any difference?
Patrick McNulty
11.10.2012
Christopher- you can’t make any assessment about how these laws effect the criminal element, in their respective states, before the law has even had a chance to be implemented.. It only passed this week, so let’s wait and see how it goes; I’d wager that your assumptions will be flawed.. As far as legality under federal law: the problem the federal govt faces in its’ involvement with states that legalize is the ability to enforce a federal law that conflicts with the law of that sovereign state..
Patrick Stuff Gossett
11.10.2012
Hmmm tabaco is a natural plant used for medicinal reasons and the same idiots banned that that want marijuana legal and yes both cause cancer and emphysema ..Always amazed at Liberal stupidity .
Patrick McNulty
11.10.2012
Patrick- ACTUALLY, There is absolutely NO legitimate scientific data that shows conclusive evidence that marijuana causes cancer (or emphysema).. In fact, researchers are finding cancer-FIGHTING elements present in THC..
Patrick McNulty
11.10.2012
Tobacco, however, is found to cause nearly half a million deaths in the US alone, ever year.. And that’s scientific consensus..
Kevin Driscoll
11.10.2012
EIGHTEEN (18) STATES in the U.S.A. allow Medical use of Marijuana with TWO (2) of those allowing recreational use. This preposterous drug war on a benign and superbly beneficial plant has reached its tipping point. THANKS GOD !!!
Nanson Hwa
11.10.2012
The economic and criminal justice goal of the United States is to put the drug cartels out of business and to prosecute those individuals who are fueling the demand of illicit drugs on the domestic front.
Patrick McNulty
11.10.2012
The demand will exist, whether or not the cartels exist, as well..
Angelo Castelli
11.10.2012
It wouldn’t surprise me if Obama tries to overrule the Colorado and Washington vote.
Mike Dodson
11.10.2012
Why not just let everyone do whatever they want. I guess that would really be moving forward.
Adrian Lewis
11.10.2012
Let’s hope sanity will prevail !
Richard Pruett
11.11.2012
Now instead of SPENDING $$$$ on a LOST WAR WE CAN MAKE TAX $$$$ off of a product that if people want (DEMAND) then they will get (SUPPLIERS) NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO!! Just look @ who made ALL of the $$$$ during prohibition, the GANGS & the POLITICIANS!!! SIMILAR???!!!
Eddy Martinez
11.11.2012
Yeah lets legalize every drug. because that wont effect society at all. People are really responsible and no one will abuse it. really?? I mean look at alcohol and how people end up dying from another persons mistake. I am for alcohol. But we will soon hear of idiots who are high while driving and kill some people. Someone help me understand why we should let something that effects are physiological and psychological state to be readily available?
Gnarly Dude
11.11.2012
Wow!! Lets CREATE another uninspiring generation of slow thinkers. The POTHEADS will solve the environmental and financials problems of our country. I run circles around my peers in college that smoke regularly. And yes I smoke once a week too. Israel has invented a form of cannabis that is prescribed for health issue. I AM REALLY DISAPPOINTED THAT THEY DID NOT LEGALIZE CRACK AND HEROIN SO THAT WE CAN TAX AND USE LEGALLY IN THE PRIVACY OF OUR HOMES. I RATHER HAVE A VARITY THAN JUST CIGARRETTES, ALCOHOL, AND MARIJUANA.