Same-Sex Marriage on Ballots Across the Country
By Lillian Ewing | 11/01/2012 | Activism, Ballot Initiatives, Issues, Maine, Minnesota, Movements, States, Washington | 35 Comments
Photo: Richard Sennott
Four states have same-sex marriage on ballots this election, with voters in those states nearly split evenly on the issue. Citizens in Maryland, Washington, Maine, and Minnesota will choose whether or not to recognize same-sex marriage on Election Day. President Obama has weighed in on the issue and publicly stated his support of same-sex marriage. The national campaign director for Freedom to Marry, Marc Solomon, noted the importance of the president’s support and its potential impact on the outcome of the initiatives on Election Day.
Maryland Question 6
Question 6 is actually a referendum and aims to keep same-sex marriage legal. The Maryland General Assembly passed the initial same-sex marriage bill in February by a narrow margin, and now voters will have to decide whether to uphold the existing law. Governor O-Malley and the legislature support the Civil Marriage Protection Act, which has redefined marriage to include same-sex couples.
The likelihood of the referendum being upheld is impacted in part by a high constituency of African American voters, who have traditionally opposed same-sex marriage (51 percent according to national Pew Research Center poll in July). Nearly 30 percent of the voting population is African American, compared to 13 percent nationally.
The NAACP has supported the president’s endorsement of the right to same-sex marriage, which could increase the likelihood of the ballot measure passing. However, some African American voters have changed their opinion in recent weeks, according to a Baltimore Sun poll which currently shows the outlook as evenly split.
Washington Referendum 74
Like Maryland, same-sex marriage is legal in Washington State. The passage of Referendum 74 would uphold same-sex marriage. President Obama’s press secretary, Paul Ball, stated, “Washington’s same-sex marriage law would treat all Washington couples equally, and that is why the president supports a vote to approve Referendum 74.” The bill was narrowly passed in Washington’s House, 55 to 43, and Senate, 28 to 21. According to the ACLU, the latest polls reveal an approval rating of 49 percent.
Minnesota Amendment One
In Minnesota, the ballot initiative is actually an amendment to the state’s constitution that would barr same-sex marriage and define marriage as only between a man and a woman. President Obama’s Minnesota campaign issued a statement opposing the state’s proposed amendment to the Constitution:
“That’s what the Minnesota ballot initiative would do – it would single out and discriminate against committed gay and lesbian couples – and that’s why the President does not support it.”
Even with the Obama campaign’s opposition to the state constitutional amendment, a recent poll found 48 percent of likely voters support the constitutional amendment, while 47 percent oppose it.
Maine Question 1
In Maine, the group Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and other organizations mobilized voters to put an initiative in support of same-sex marriage on the November ballot. Supporters, encouraged by the campaign work of Mainers United for Marriage, delivered over 105,000 petition signatures for the citizen’s initiative to the Secretary of the State, double the number of necessary signatures.
A poll by the Maine People’s Resource Center found 58.2% of registered voters supported same-sex marriage between March 31 and April 2, 2012, and a September 2012 Public Policy Polling survey shows similar results, with 52% of Maine voters supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage. Maine has emerged as the state, from among the battle ground states including Maine, Washington, and Minnesota, as the most likely to pass a bill authorizing the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.





Leave Your Comment →
35 Comments
Jane Susskind
11.01.2012
@jsusskind
Washington state will be an interesting state to watch – same-sex marriage and the legalization of marijuana. I expect a high voter turnout, from both those in support and those in stark opposition.
Chad Peace
11.01.2012
@Chad_Peace
I am not shocked, but the marriage issue is just used by both sides to gin up emotion. It’s important, but it should not be the focal point of so many elections.
Blake Bunch
11.01.2012
@blakebunch
This shouldn’t even be a political issue anymore, but unfortunately, the federal government has not approved same sex marriage, so it will remain so.
Lucas Eaves
11.01.2012
@lucaseaves
Very interesting that so many states will face that question. It shows that this question is continually becoming the new normal.
Michael Higham
11.01.2012
@michaelhigham
It’s only a matter of time before same-sex marriage is legal in every state. It shouldn’t be a political issue or even an issue at all, because government shouldn’t be in the business of making moral judgments of marriage.
Alex Gauthier
11.01.2012
@alexg
the African American vote was a critical voting bloc that helped pass prop 8 here in ca
Trevor Bacquet
11.01.2012
right now, it’s not high on my list of priorities. I’m more concerned about national survival
Peter Mac Kelly
11.01.2012
It’s the economy stupid. This is not the time for single issue voting though the gaybos will disagree.
Ronald Edwards
11.01.2012
I think this shouldn’t be a voting issue. We don’t vote on peoples’ rights based on skin color, religion or gender so why are we voting on these rights for having a predilection for people of their own gender?
Paul Higgins
11.01.2012
So Peter? The economy is more important than a group of people’s civil rights? Very 1863 of you…
Thom Evans
11.01.2012
I wonder if Sweden took a vote when they made half-sibling marriage legal? Is incest marriage the next issue up for popular attention in the U.S.?
Kai Marks
11.01.2012
I voted to approve in WA.
Carol Belflower Bland
11.01.2012
It’s not a priority IMO… social issues should ALL be back burner-ed until the economy problems are solved. And FYI, Obama just SAID he now supports gay marriage to get the gay vote, he will NEVER support a bill passing… thus no one has heard a peep from him about it since his “big announcement”.
Daniel
11.02.2012
It’s really naive to think so cause economy will never be okay. There will always be people jobless and always be crisis, financial disasters etc. MONEY SHOULD NOT RULE THE WORLD. I#m a happy homosexual dad who madea kid with a female homosexual friend of mine and we both live together with our same sex partners and with the kid. Homosexuals can reprodruce natural through petting. There is no heterosexual marriage cause also bisexuals(M+F) get married and bisexuals are not heterosexual . If a homosexual couples starts a family with another same sex couple(male +female gay couple or a gay man and a gay woman ) it has nothing to do with heterosexuality , we’re still homosexual and the kid has a homosexual dad and a homosexual mother. If someone will lose the job in our family , there are still 3 other adults who bring the money home . Good for the kid and there si always someone here who can help the kid with homework etc. or if something is gonna happen wrong (accident) with me and the mother of the kid there are still our same sex partners that our kid knows cause we all live together.
Homosexuals are unnatural? No way.
Ben Sherman
11.01.2012
The pres has freedom of speech too
Paul Higgins
11.01.2012
Not a priority for you carol… Tell the man who’s spouse is dying in a hospital, that is being denied visiting rights because he isn’t family. Tell it the the woman who’s spouse died, and she couldn’t collect her spouse’s belongings because the family was as close minded as you.
Thom Evans
11.01.2012
I dare anyone to name any culture ever, anywhere, before the past 3 or 4 or so decades that ritualized marriage as a symbolic union was anything other than between man and woman. There’s a reason why it had up until modern days that it was like that. There’s also a reason why modem man is now the furthest removed from original instinct than ever before and is suffering greatly from it. We now think we are above nature and its laws. It can not get any more simple than this…the two sexes exist solely for the other, the rest is Ego-consciousness demanding its own way over instinct.
Gay people are just people like you and me and should be treated the same. But in terms of marriage, I disagree based on psychology and anthropology.
Daniel
11.02.2012
Only married people make kids? There are also unmarried people who make kids , so marriage is not the big kids maker. gays can’t reproduce? We live in a world with many people and there are also women who do not want to have a realtionship but wanna start a family , so they also have petting with a homosexual man etc. we live in a world where everybody and every couple can naturally reproduce cause there is not only sex for reproduction , also petting .
Paul Higgins
11.02.2012
Thom, why does it matter to you? Does it somehow demote your own marriage?
Thom Evans
11.02.2012
Paul, a rule of reality is that we can’t have everything we want. We can’t have everything always be fair. Accepting this is accepting reality and being humble. Nit picking exceptions and splitting hairs could be philosophically made for ANY hypothetical situation.
Ah, to hell with it. Why don’t we allow incest married like Sweden and be “progressive”!! Lmao!
Thom Evans
11.02.2012
Nope, it demotes society. Because being part of society, it does matter to me. It is furthering the split between man and original instinct. Where is it written that “modern” is equal with “better”?
Daniel
11.02.2012
Because one man and one woman families are not that strong? A big family is much stronger . Repruction is romantic yuz u start ur own family it doesn’t matter how u do it but I think reprocution has nothing to do with love you just need to know someone for long and like each other. Imagine just one man and a woman will survive on earth and that do not know each , love each other or like each other , so they’d reproduce to make a new humanity ,also if they don’t know each other , love each other and like each other…Do not separate gays from gays cause there’re three sexualities heterosexuality , bisexuality, homosexuality (asexuality) etc. If there is just one country where only homosexuality exist the country will not end/die etc. CAUSE THERE ARE homosexual men and homosexual women and gays will allow to get married in this country and the country will not end /die cause gays allow gys to get married cause gays can reproduce through petting.
Thom Evans
11.02.2012
But I’m done with this topic. You pro-gay marriage people go play in Neverland.
Kenny Catron
11.02.2012
I have a very different outlook on this. Since the word “marriage” is a Christian word, (a word that describes a bond between a man and a woman), how about instead of calling it gay marriage, we call it a civil bond between two people. They would have the same rights as married folk, it would just be called something different. That way both sides of the issue wins! Am I wrong here? Probably am, just trying to apease both sides. I personally don’t care who is with who, God told me I didn’t have to judge, he said he would do that! Good thing to, that’s an aweful burden!
Kerry Douglas McKennon
11.02.2012
As a gay married man….it is not my top issue for voting. The ecomony is. Plus Obama is pandering to get the gay vote. Civil rights will ultimatily be decided by the courts, not votes. Because there will always be those that want to limit the rights of those they hate, don’t understand or want to control through a few scriptures.
Daniel
11.02.2012
But you know that courts can’t help you if everything is gonn abe serious? If republicans try to therapy or heal homosexuals or want to make gay marrigae illegal , also if courts say it is not okay..
If people let you live free then everythings is okay. If a court says it’s okay does not mean that people think it is okay and people have more power than a court! Before a court says it is wrong you could be executed for being gay because people wanted to execute you . So don’t trust in courts !!!
Jason Hall
11.02.2012
Civil rights, women’s rights and social issues are number 1 for me and is what I look at in a candidate.
Erin Bo Barin
11.02.2012
I love men who care about women’s rights. Ty Jason!
Frances Berndt
11.02.2012
Kerry, well and truly said without propagating hate. Thank you.
Susan Fortney
11.02.2012
First obama was not for gay marriage..then he was for gay marriage… it is all about the vote for him. Gay marriage is a Civil Rights issue…and it will come through the courts as such. The weak economy and his lack of international and domestic leadership is why I am not voting for obama. The “stand down” order in Benghaze was the last straw for me.
John McKenna
11.02.2012
Obama is such a joke – the Federal Govt does not recognize same sex marriages but he has the nerve to comment on states? When the IRS allows gay/lesbian to file “married joint” return then Obama can weigh in, until then he should just shut up
Kenny Catron
11.02.2012
Let’s just give peace a chance…..John Lennon
Tom Terrell
11.02.2012
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: make all unions between consenting adults sanctioned by the government for tax, inheritance and family purposes and take the religious aspect out. Make “marriage” a thing for religious institutions to decide who to discriminate against and who to favor. That way, the government can remain impartial and the religious institutions can keep their self-importance.
Susan Fortney
11.02.2012
Kenny, I thought we already had Civil Unions for alternative life style marriage? I like your thoughts on this issue.
Kenny Catron
11.02.2012
We have civil unions, but they don’t have the same rights as a married man and woman, such as insurance, or say one is on life support, their partner of umpty dump years can’t make a decision based soley because they are not recognized as the “soul mate”, (for a lack of better words).