In Last Days of Presidential Race, Iowa Gains Importance
By Emma Goda | 11/01/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, President, States | 19 Comments
Photo: Carolyn Kaster
Among many important states this election, there is one in particular that is gaining attention in the last days of the presidential race: Iowa. Iowa is fairly rural and has a large white population (93 percent, according to census data), with an economy that has been well insulated from the recession.
Its historical importance to presidential elections is highlighted during the caucuses but media focus sometimes trails off as the campaign trail wears on. It seems that Iowa could play an imperative role on November 6, where candidates have spent a disproportionately large amount of money for the state’s small number of electoral votes.
According to a CBS News report:
“With just 14 Iowa field offices, the Romney campaign and aligned Republican committees have only a fraction of the staff on the ground that their Democratic opponents have at their disposal.”
Despite this, the latest surveys from Public Policy Polling (PPP) show Obama is leading the GOP challenger Mitt Romney, 50 to 45 among likely voters. This a 3-point bump for the president from the same poll ending last week. The Romney campaign believes that they are outperforming their goal in Iowa although this isn’t necessarily indicative of a sweep for the Republican, which is a full of blue collar counties located in the southeast.
On Monday, Mitt Romney said he feels optimistic about the election when he attended a rally in Seven Cities Sod with over 2,250 supporters. Additionally, he spoke on his agenda for the next four years, including his tax and economic plans.
The Iowa caucuses are always the first in the nation in the process of nominating presidential candidates. Often times, Iowa’s support of a candidate will give an indication of how the rest of the nation might vote in an election year.
Obama won the Iowa caucus in 2008, which eventually landed him in the Oval Office later that year. He also won the state’s six electoral votes in that election. This time around, the president may still have some work to do to guarantee the state’s votes.





Leave Your Comment →
19 Comments
Matt Metzner
11.01.2012
@mmetzner
Haven’t heard a whole lot about Iowa in the past week, most of the focus has been on Ohio. There are still multiple electoral votes to be had there that could give either campaign a much needed bump.
Chad Peace
11.01.2012
@Chad_Peace
I understand the electoral system, but if we moved away from it, everyone, not just a few swing states, would become important again.
Jane Susskind
11.01.2012
@jsusskind
Yeah, living in California kind of sucks during presidential elections. Candidates only want you for your money here…
Michael Higham
11.01.2012
@michaelhigham
If Romney took Iowa, it might send a message towards the other swing states. Not sure if it’ll have a large impact on other swing states but Romney would need all the help he can get.
Blaz Gutierrez
11.01.2012
@blazgutierrez
All eyes on Ohio, as always during the election season. Does Ohio get much love any other time of the year?
Alex Gauthier
11.01.2012
@alexg
All this focus on Ohio, everyone keeps forgetting that there are in fact, other states in the union that vote
Emma Goda
11.01.2012
@emmagoda
Never understood why Iowa was so important until now.
Tim Locke
11.02.2012
so far today, i have heard no less than it is down to 4 or 5 different states voters who may “Decide” this years election. still 30 minutes in the day, maybe Michigan can be the next “Decisional” state the election will fall upon the shoulders of. lol
Theresa Radford
11.02.2012
GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Krettler
11.02.2012
As an Independant , I need to vote for Obama. It’s a slow move forward but it is movement. what needs to change is congress. They and only they can make the change.
Peter Mac Kelly
11.02.2012
Go Home to Chicago NObama!
Susan Bright-Vititoe
11.02.2012
Chris: Obama IS the problem with congress. It is him!! Eric
Cantor spoke out today when asked when the last time was he met with Obama – Answer: 1 year. We need a leader. Dem Senate hasn’t produced a budget in 3 years????? Doesn’t take a brain surgeon to see what the problem is…..AND, lying, deceiving the American people does not instill trust. He needs to be gone.
Kate Swigonski
11.02.2012
Nice to know that my vote in Alabama doesn’t matter. End the electoral college!
Herve Abrams
11.02.2012
Look at the job creation chart at the following link and you will notice the following:
1. The U.S. was losing hundreds of thousands of jobs per month as Pres. Obama took office.
2. Job creation dramatically improved at about the same time that the economic stimulus was implemented. From LOSING almost 800,000 jobs in March of 2009 to GAINING over 400,000 in May of 2010.
3. The positive trend in job creation was stopped and reversed in June of 2010; 5 months after the Republican Party gained control of the House of Representatives, and has remained relatively stagnant ever since.
Feel free to draw your own conclusions from the data, but there is no denying chart does show that the greatest job creation took place shortly after the Stimulus took effect and slowed dramatically after Republicans took control of Congress.
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/bikini-graph-September-2012-overall-economy-via-Steve-Benen-at-The-Maddow-Blog.jpg
Kathy Jones
11.02.2012
Have family in Iowa both in Des Monies, Fort Dodge. Voted for Kennedy, Clinton and Obama in 2008. Last discussion three weeks ago when we drove from California and stopped there is they will NOT be voting for Obama this time around.
Sheril Carey
11.02.2012
Each election cycle, Iowa always manages to remind us that we need to do something about the flaws in the primary process.
Suzanne Cuomo Kelly
11.02.2012
I want a better country for my son, that is why I will vote ROMNEY/RYAN.
Gary Arend
11.02.2012
no
Bev Valarinos
11.02.2012
oh ow independent of you.lol