Attempts to Legalize Marijuana: Three States Will Try in November
By Jane Susskind | 10/30/2012 | Drugs, Oregon, Washington | 53 CommentsThree states will attempt to legalize marijuana this November, as support for such measures grows. According to a Rasmussen poll, 56% of Americans are in favor of legalizing marijuana and regulating it in a similar fashion to alcohol and cigarette consumption. As support rises, three Western states are embracing an open-mind in the area of marijuana legalization, with the reality of legal marijuana consumption potentially materializing in Colorado, Washington and Oregon.
In Colorado, Amendment 64, if passed, would legalize the possession of up to an ounce of marijuana for adults 21 or over. The FBI reports that one marijuana arrest occurs every 42 seconds. With more than 10,000 of those arrests coming from Colorado annually, proponents of Amendment 64 argue that passage would cut state costs and allow for increased revenue through state regulations. “We continue to see a trend of increasing arrests year after year after year,” Betty Aldworth, campaign spokesperson argues.
On moral grounds, legalizing marijuana is an issue of civil rights, argues the NAACP. In the midst of a drug war, the number of African Americans and Latinos being arrested for the low-level crime of possession is disproportionately high. California NAACP President Alice Huffman argues, “when you have a law that is not applied evenly across the board, then you have discrimination, and it’s legal discrimination.” More generally, it could be argued that prohibiting marijuana violates liberty, one of the principles on which the US was founded.
Opponents of the Colorado initiative, however, offer a different perspective in the debate over the legalization of marijuana. When discussing the risks of legalization, the group Smart Colorado likens legalized pot to the legalization of alcohol. The challenge, the group advocates, will be making sure marijuana stays out of the hands of the youth.
An October poll on the Colorado proposition finds 48% of respondents in support, with 43% opposed to the legalization of marijuana and 9% of likely voters undecided.
In Washington, a similar initiative is on the ballot, but has yielded more support in the month leading up to the election. Washington’s Initiative 502, which would legalize marijuana, leads in the polls with 54% support, 38% opposition, and 7% undecided. The initiative mirrors Colorado’s Amendment 64, and would legalize marijuana for recreational use among people 21 years old or above. Similarly, it would tax the sale of marijuana.
Opposition of the initiative doesn’t just come from those opposed to smoking marijuana. Steve Sarich, the manager of the “No On I-502″ campaign produces and smokes medical marijuana. While he is unopposed to the drug, he argues that the initiative will “put the screws on medical marijuana users,” according to an NPR report.
One of the provisions of the initiative sets a THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, limit in the bloodstream of drivers. Similar to blood alcohol content, this level would be set in order to prevent reckless driving. The flaw in this provision, Sarich argues, is that marijuana differs from alcohol because of the amount of time THC stays in the blood stream.
As the third Western state making attempts to legalize marijuana, Oregon is lacking support for legalization. The Cannabis Tax Act, or Measure 80 aims to regulate, tax, and manage marijuana for adults 21 and up in Oregon. Unlike the other two ballot initiatives, however, Oregon’s measure would “change the whole paradigm,” says hemp and medical marijuana advocate, Paul Stanford.
Oregon’s measure would license growers to produce hemp for the state to purchase. There would be no limit to the amount of marijuana legally acceptable for a person to have. Slate lays out the 5 key differences in Oregon’s measure, labeling it one of the most progressive laws. And while Oregon has one of the highest rates of marijuana use in the country, a lack of funding could threaten Oregon’s Measure 80. With just $1,800 left in their bank account, organizers face an uphill battle in transforming marijuana policy in the state.







Leave Your Comment →
53 Comments
Impacts of Marijuana
10.30.2012
@impacts_of_marijuana
Top 10 Reasons Not to Legalize Marijuana
10: IT WOULD STILL BE ILLEGAL
In July 2011 the federal government reaffirmed marijuana as a Schedule I substance; i.e., no accepted medical use and high abuse potential. Therefore, its possession and use remains a federal crime. Since federal law preempts state law, marijuana would still be illegal.
9: MARIJUANA POSSESSION/USE IS NOT IMPACTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Proponents often make misleading statements about marijuana arrests and the jail population. In Colorado, the use and possession of less than two ounces (120 – 168 cigarettes) is treated as a traffic violation with a fine and not jail time.
8: WHY REPEAT AMSTERDAM’S MISTAKE
The wrong type of people would be attracted to our State and for the wrong reasons. We need tourists attracted by our pristine streams and beautiful mountains, not as the mecca for getting ‘stoned.’
7: NEGATIVE IMAGE OF OUR STATE
If marijuana is legalized, our state would be considered the ‘POT CAPITAL’ of the nation. This notoriety would have a negative impact on attracting new businesses and families deterred by image and quality of life issues. This could also impact decisions to send students to institutes of higher education.
6: HARM TO EXISTING BUSINESSES AND THE ECONOMY
Substance abuse studies have shown that businesses and employers will experience greater rates of absenteeism, industrial accidents and tardiness as well as less productivity with a potential work force regularly using marijuana. This not only results in economic losses, but conflicts with the federal Drug Free Workplace requirements and companies losing federal contracts. Businesses would be less likely to stay or move into a state where drug use related risks are high.
5: BLINDSIDE ECONOMICS
At best, potential tax revenue generated by legalizing marijuana will cover only 15% of the collateral costs to our community such as: increased drug treatment,
emergency room visits, crime, traffic accidents and school ‘drop-outs’ to name just a few of the costs related to marijuana use.
4: MARIJUANA USE WOULD INCREASE
Marijuana use and its negative health, behavioral and societal impacts will increase among both youth and adults. The best estimates from experts project that the number of regular users would at least double and likely triple in the most vulnerable 12 – 25 age range.
3: TREATMENT AND ADDICTION RATES WOULD RISE
Regular marijuana use can be addictive and lead to deteriorating behavior, particularly in young people. In 2009, 830,000 youth had marijuana addiction characteristics. Sixty-eight percent of youth in drug treatment are there for marijuana use.
2: ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
As parents and citizens, we have a responsibility to prepare our youth for a healthy and successful future. The basis for their future lies in providing them with a quality educational environment. If marijuana was legalized, it is estimated that 20 – 30 percent of our school-aged children will become regular marijuana users. That will negatively affect their attendance, concentration, memory, brain development and thus academic achievement and participation in a positive educational setting.
Walt Disney: “Our greatest natural resource is the mind of our children.”
Let’s not allow those minds to be polluted with pot.
1: DEATHS FROM IMPAIRED DRIVING WOULD INCREASE
Marijuana use affects coordination, decision-making and perception which directly results in impaired driving. Annually, approximately 50 people are killed in Colorado traffic accidents due to people driving under the influence of marijuana. With the increased use of marijuana, we can project that figure will at least double.
CONSIDERING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF LEGALIZING MARIJUANA, ASK YOURSELF:
“Do we want to States to become the country’s ‘experimental lab’ with such potentially devastating human, economic and social costs so a small fraction of people can ‘get stoned’ with impunity?”
IT DOES NOT PASS THE ‘COMMON SENSE’ TEST.
michael
10.30.2012
It’s a good thing people like you are becoming dinosaurs. ER visits? Addiction? This isn’t the 20′s. We know you’re lying, and people are sick of it. I don’t want to come home and relax with a beer, I want to come home and relax with a JOINT. I am a citizen of a supposed free country, and I demand my rights.
So let me help you-
1- Yes it would be federally illegal. Until Colorado and Washington send a message to the feds, that we are tired of the federal government telling us how to live. How does any change begin?
9- It’s not affecting the judicial system AS MUCH because WE changed the law, probably with no help from you. But it still causes undue violations of 4th amendment rights, to have police dictating to me what I can and cannot have in my possession. A PLANT NO LESS!
8- People come here for our beer, is that not worse than people coming to smoke a joint and spend time in the mountains? Nothing is more relaxing and better than a joint on a 14,000 summit. Only Colorado can provide that. Yes on 64.
7- 56% of Americans support legalization, so contrary to your thoughts, we would be a trendsetter for the entire nation.
6- My job readily accepted my redcard, and says they are ready to stop SPENDING THEIR MONEY TO TEST PEOPLE FOR MARIJUANA. They have hundreds of employees.
5- School dropouts due to marijuana? Hospital visits and car accidents? That’s fear politics, and completely dishonest- I.E. PROVE IT
Fort Collins dispensary’s contributed 400,000 to the city alone, without ANY increase in crime, and I CAN PROVE THAT. Not to mention that most of the profits will GO TOWARD EDUCATION FUNDING. Yes on 301.
4- It would not increase marijuana use, but instead bring folks out of the shadows they have been forced into. But for some reason McDonalds is legal, even though it CLEARLY kill more people than marijuana. If you can’t tread on my right to grease, you can’t tread on my right to weeds!
3- All studies show marijuana is not addictive. Anyone in treatment for marijuana is COURT ORDERED- and thus raising the percentage of people in treatment for something that isn’t an addiction. Legalizing would save everyone the trouble of these costly and undeeded programs.
2- We will not be selling pot to children, how dare you. And their access will not rise. Kids have been smoking pot for decades, this won’t make them smoke more. That’s just fear politics, the only things 64 opponents are good at.
1- Prove it. That’s a bold faced lie, as with medical- it has not risen.
The people against 64 can only use fear and division to try and make their point, they are people afraid of progress and freedom. Colorado and Washington will send a message to the federal government, and the poster above- that our rights to freedom are divine from God and we will have them.
John
10.30.2012
Great post Michael, good luck to Colorado and I hope you all show up at the polls in a few days! Everyone else like the first poster can sit back, relax and soak up some of that logic.
That first post by Impact is so full of misinformation and blatant lies that its not even funny… and I can absolutely assure you that there are MANY more people like myself, my businees and family, whos plans of moving to CO are contingent on 64 passing, than there are senile/brainwashed people who have been bullied or confused into believing anti marijuana propaganda, and are afraid of it becoming, as it was referrenced lol, a “stoner mecca”.
Impacts of Marijuana
11.01.2012
@impacts_of_marijuana
Marijuana causes DUIs and fatal car wrecks. A study from the New England Journal of Medicine, found nearly half of impaired drivers who were not using alcohol tested positive for marijuana. That’s why the number of fatal car wrecks involving marijuana skyrocketed in Montana when their medical marijuana law went into effect. Out of 303 cases, 43% of DUID cases involved THC the active ingredient in marijuana.
Marijuana use adversely affects a person’s concentration, coordination, and perception, all important skills for safe driving.
In 2009, 28% of all fatally-injured drivers tested positive for marijuana use. 1
Last year in Colorado, over 50 people were killed because of marijuana-impaired drivers. 2
A study of 182 truck accidents causing death found 12.8% of the drivers were under influence of Marijuana. 3
1 Cesar Analysis of 2009 National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration FARS Data
2 “Drugged Driving Getting Worse in Colorado”, 9News.com, 2011 February 17
3 Concerned Citizens for Drug Prevention, Inc. citing National Transportation and Safety Board, 1994
Damon Dennis
11.01.2012
Blah Blah Blah go live under a rock and die… The church is always open if you are scared…
Jane Susskind
10.30.2012
@jsusskind
Would you be interested in having this content published on IVN?
Chad Peace
10.30.2012
@Chad_Peace
The big issue in the federal government. So long as the feds still have the laws on the books, state measures will always be suspect and anyone in the industry will still be labeled a “criminal”.
Matt Metzner
10.30.2012
@mmetzner
Surprising to see Oregon lacking support. The problem seems to be largely financial rather than lacking public sentiment.
bodazyphir
10.30.2012
Why dont they use crowdsource funding ?
http://www.indiegogo.com/
Brad R. Schlesinger
10.30.2012
@bradschlesinger
The problem in Oregon is multifaceted. While finances play a roll, the initiative was not certified for the ballot until almost August (which is fairly late compared to CO and WA), so many Oregonians were not aware of the measure, and in fact, some voters still do not know the measure exists (evidenced by the large percentage of undecideds in some polls taken on the support for initiative). Plus, the legislation itself is far from ideal (see CO), there was also some significant infighting between competing drug reform groups in the state as to the particular language, as well as not coordinating with national drug policy reform organizations. Add in the opposition of the medical marijuana industry, who is well financed, and it makes for an almost certain loser.
Impacts of Marijuana
11.01.2012
@impacts_of_marijuana
Has nothing to do with financing on Oregon’s Measure 80. Oregon Voters have twice said no to marijuana pot dispensaries, once in 2004 and again in 2010, and they will again say NO resoundingly to marijuana legalization. We may be a liberal State, but we are not a stupid State.
Oregon Chief Petitioner Paul Stanford of Measure 80 was arrested for Tax Evasion this past year.
http://oregonbusinessreport.com/2011/05/hemp-foundation-president-guilty-of-tax-evasion/
Lucas Eaves
10.30.2012
@lucaseaves
In the midst of financial , finding a new resource to tax might not be the worst idea.
electedface
10.30.2012
Estimates show that marijuana is America’s number one cash crop. However, marijuana remains untaxed. This is a new source of income for our nation, an income we desperately need.
Over 500 of the nation’s top economic professors have shared their opinion in supporting the removing the prohibition and imposing the taxation and regulation of marijuana as a way to slow the federal deficit.
Ending marijuana prohibition would save the US $7.7 BILLION annually. That is nearly as much as Congress’ proposed Budget Control Act. Think of the jobs it would create, the court time I would save and the jail space it would free up for actual criminals.
Sign the petition below. Also, create a group, this will connect every member directly to their elected officials.
Emma Goda
10.30.2012
@emmagoda
I think they should legalize it.
Alex Gauthier
10.30.2012
@alexg
the feds will have quite the time trying to wrangle legal weed operations in three different states if all the props pass. would be like an episode of benny hill
Brad R. Schlesinger
10.30.2012
@bradschlesinger
On the contrary, stark distinctions exist between I-502 and Amendment 64. Major differences exist as to the scheme of cultivation, production, and distribution the proposed laws would allow, as well as the per se limit for THC that can be in one’s system while driving. While the drug policy reform movement is backing both initiatives, Washington’s I-502 language is much more tepid than Colorado’s proposed law. The Colorado measure would allow adults 21 and older to cultivate up to six plants in a locked location. It would also provide for the registration and state-legal operation of marijuana wholesalers, retailers, and testing facilities. On the other hand, the Washington measure does not allow for individual/personal adult cultivation of marijuana, and would allow marijuana-only stores to sell marijuana to adults 21 and older. The Liquor Control Board would regulate and license the stores. The per se THC limit, no personal cultivation, and marijuana-only stores language contained in I-502 makes it by far the worse of the two. These differences are significant, and while I-502 is far from ideal, these differences between the proposed laws are enough of a reason not to support I-502.
Brad R. Schlesinger
10.30.2012
@bradschlesinger
Excuse me: These differences are significant, and while I-502 is far from ideal, these differences between the proposed laws are NOT enough of a reason not to support I-502.
Tiff Hunt
10.30.2012
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/10/29/legalize-marijuana-regulate-tax/1666763/
troy bland
10.30.2012
i feel marijuana should be legal and regulated just like alcohol and tobacco products. taxed the same and all just think of all the tax revenue that would be generated not too mention all the tax payers money saved no arresting these non violent drug offenders. FREEDOM OF CHOICE AMERICA WAKE UP.
Amy Counts Farmer
10.30.2012
I support the legalization because the war on drugs has created more violence associated with it’s prohibition than the drug itself. I believe that marijuana could be regulated just as alcohol is regulated.
Wizzle Hizzle
10.30.2012
Yes because prohibition violates liberty
Sheril Carey
10.30.2012
I would say that I am not opposed to legalizing it. I think there are some valid arguments on both sides. It is a judgement call. And this will purely come down to the percentages of Americans who make each judgement for or against.
Donny Zaltzberg
10.30.2012
yes 2 reasons first and foremost, freedom are we a free nation or not? Do people have the ability to make their own choices or not. Second and only by a small margin, making any substance illegal creates a black market and organized crime, if there is a want for such a substance people will find a way to get it. This also promotes violence within the organized crime. Also the government ends up eroding freedom spending tons of money for terrible results and non violent offenders end up going to jail and having their lives ruined becuz of a nonsense law.
Pauli Ranney
10.30.2012
I do. I believe that we could use the revenue from sales and taxes to help this country recover and prosper. It has hundreds of viable good uses, and hey, some of the best stuff is grown by our government…just saying. :)
Bryce Girardi
10.30.2012
Untapped tax base, jobs and it just makes sense.
Holly Stowe
10.30.2012
I do not support legalization but I DO support decriminalization. Link BIG monetary fines or community service hours as punishment for users or carriers of small individual-use sized amounts. Only use jail time for sellers/suppliers. We don’t need more under-the-influence people on our roads…and legalization will increase use.
Jim Lambert
10.30.2012
Yes I do. Fighting it is a waste of resources. Regulate it and tax it like alcohol. Use the money for education and rehab.
Holly Stowe
10.30.2012
Either that or legalize it for in-home use only.
Jane Susskind
10.30.2012
@jsusskind
How would you regulate this?
Richard Griffin
10.30.2012
Am I for personal choice, a small state, industry, and medicine for those who need it? Yes, I believe it fits that bill.
Jenny Jo
10.31.2012
Amen to this.
Holly Stowe
10.30.2012
The dumb thing is that the government went after tobacco and then you expect the, to legalize marijuana? Smoking anything is bad for your lungs, period. But if the costs high enough and the taxes as well…then maybe. Gotta make it EXPENSIVE to help pay for the societal ramifications.
Aly Delp
10.30.2012
Yes. We’re wasting millions of dollars prosecuting and jailing “criminals” for the use of a “drug” that is less harmful than either alcohol or tobacco products.
Theresa Zwart-Ludeman
10.30.2012
Legalize it. The country needs the taxes.
John Barton
10.30.2012
I support that only the states have the right to make it legal or not. It should not be a Federal issue. I personally think that burning anything and inhaling the hot smoke and ash is not a good idea, but neither is drinking excessive alcohol.
Jenny Jo
10.31.2012
You won’t see states get control of issues, unfortunately, until the federal income tax is abolished, and states go back to making the majority of their money on their own, rather than caving to federal pressure on their laws so that the fed doesn’t withhold all that money they need to pave the roads and run the lights.
Amanda Billings
10.30.2012
Yes I support it for many reasons. The first one being that I oppose the propagandist lies placed upon our society in regards to cannabis and hemp. Secondly, because it can help and heal so many. Thirdly, because indus hemp could restore our forests and farmlands while providing an ecologically sound product for many uses! And fourthly, because what I choose to do with my body should be none of the gov’ts business, particularly pertaining to a plant that is much safer than alcohol!
Ed Waters
10.30.2012
Prohibition never works, for the people. Wonder why it was made illegal to start with? Hemp is a miracle plant with endless uses, from fabrics to fuel to medicines. The profit from legaliztion would go to the people, instead of the private prison systems, slimey bankers, the CIA, etc. etc.
Jenny Jo
10.31.2012
It was made illegal due to corrupt politicians and some “famous” popular, rich people who started propaganda campaigns and funded fake scientific studies and scare tactics because they didn’t want to lose money on their wood pulp and paper investments when hemp replaced them as a wonder plant. You can google who, if you are really interested in how the American people have been sheeped for almost a century.
William Pfister
10.30.2012
Other than the revenue it will raise both in the public and private sectors, it’s about “High” time we do the socially responsible thing when it comes to pot. I say YES to hemp!!!!!
Stacy Alexander Dill
10.30.2012
Just another get-out-the-vote effort.
Wesley Alonzo
10.30.2012
It is a waste of US tax dollars and law enforcements time to be pursuing kids and adults who want to get high on their own time. Marijuana poses little threat, other than the tar inhaled into your lungs, to the human body and Marijuana related crime is little to non existent in most cities.
Wesley Alonzo
10.30.2012
Sugar, Alcohol, and Cigarettes are our biggest killers.
Michael Steven Haas
10.30.2012
Many don’t know that when alcohol prohibition ended, marijuana was made illegal- before that it was legal. Now alcohol and pharmaceutical lobbying has put pressure on the polititions
Linda Moore
10.30.2012
Legalize it.
Lana Gail Osborne Dearing
10.30.2012
Absolutely. It has many medical purposes. Save on prescription drugs and only side effects arelaid back and hunger
Mike Morrato
10.30.2012
Colorado, and as a resident and supporter, is doing it wrong though. I don’t see how it is prudent to enshrine a vice in the state constitution. I feel there are better ways to regulate and manage marijuana but amendment 64 is not the right way to do it IMO.
Michael Steven Haas
10.30.2012
Politicians (sorry for how I accidentally sent the last post before finishing) to keep this ridiculous law in place. If you compare Marijuana to Alcohol there is no comparison. Marijuana is safer in every way, not to mention the medical and industrial uses the plant could provide. Time to wake up and legalize!
Jeff Joohan Kim
10.30.2012
All time high? I see what you did tharrrrrr
Damon Dennis
10.30.2012
I think they need to make it legal I am sick of the human race going to war with its own planet! It is madness and a stain on the human race itself we look like fools burning Earth’s crops talking about “we are at war” same with the Coco leaf.
I am in the US Army and shall return to smoking pot once I have done my serve to my country “I have earned this right” is what I shall say when I roll up a fatty.
BlackMetal Mikey Deegan
10.31.2012
@blackmetal_mikey_deegan
weed better/ boozes give peolpe hang over
Justin Shaffer
11.06.2012
I myself don’t think it would hurt to try. I know allot of family members that smoke the drug more than ciggarettes, and both me and my doctor have talked about using it for my epilepsy treatment… ;-)
Damon Dennis
11.06.2012
Umm; yes indeed and when I get out of the Army I shall toke for my shoulder injury ;-) Don’t wanna get hooked on pain pills :-) I need a doctor PLEASE!!!