Facebook in the 2012 Election: 10 Reasons Why it Matters
By Jane Susskind | 10/29/2012 | Elections 2012 | 13 CommentsOn October 4th, 2012, Facebook passed the 1 billion user milestone, securing its role at the top of the social media ladder. In the age of social media, Facebook plays a transformative role in the 2012 election and the lens through which we view it.
Facebook provides a platform for politicians, candidates, voters, journalists, and spectators to find and spread information, Facebook affects all of us this election. For politicians and candidates, it provides a space to directly interact and engage with voters. For voters across the nation, it provides a wealth of information on state, local, and the nationwide election that yields the power to mobilize voters to get out the vote. For journalists and spectators, it opens up the dialogue surrounding the election, allowing journalists to use its vast user-base to crowdsource, fact-check, and gain insight into what Americans are talking about online.
Facebook has already had a monumental effect on the 2012 election. Below are 10 reasons why it matters:
1) Energizing Young Voters
In an era when 98% of people aged 18-24 use social media, a digital strategy is a necessity for any campaign. In 2008, John McCain learned that lesson the hard way, when there were only 18 million U.S. Facebook users between the ages of 18-29 years old. With Facebook hitting 1 billion users this year, that number is much higher.
Young voters increasingly get their information online, but Facebook is not just about spreading information. It has the ability to mobilize young voters, made evident by this study.
2) “The Friend Factor”
In a study led by the University of California San Diego, voter turnout increased among voters who had seen or shared messages about voting on Facebook. Known as the “Friend Factor,” peer pressure on Facebook resulted in an additional 340,000 votes in the 2010 primary election. Additionally, the messages were non-partisan, proving that Facebook, not party politics, is responsible for this increase.
3) Facebook is the new TV
Despite record high spending from SuperPACs on television ads this election season, Americans are increasingly “going off the grid,” according to a recent study by SAY Media. In an August survey of likely voters in Ohio and Florida, SAY Media reported 31 % of likely voters in the two battleground states watched no live TV in the previous week. Additionally, 36% of 18-44 year olds and 15% of likely voters over 44 years old watch less TV than they did a year ago. With the advent of online live-streaming, voters no longer rely on TV as their main source for news. And 52% of likely voters in Florida and Ohio watch video via the Internet on a weekly basis. Voters are turning off the television and replacing live broadcasts with online media shared extensively on Facebook.
4) Picking Winners
According to a study conducted by NM Incite, a project of the Nielsen/McKinsey company, candidates with more social media mentions win 75% of the time. The study analyzed the social media approaches and numbers of four different races and concluded that, while three out of the four winners had the most social media mentions in their race, ”the share of online buzz for each winning candidate was often higher than their percent of votes, demonstrating a strong correlation but not necessarily a causal relationship between social media and election results.” So, while social media activity plays an important role in a successful campaign, it is just one of many contributing factors involved in a victory.
5) Facebook Apps
Facebook apps provide users the opportunity to interact with the political process through social media. Interactive features urge voters to get involved, spread information, and follow the election directly from the social media website. CNN, for example, teamed up with Facebook to create the “I’m Voting” App, which allows Facebook users to pledge to vote on Election day. Relying on the social sharing aspect of Facebook, the application urges voters to share their pledge with friends and family by giving users the option of posting it on their timelines.
Speaking of Facebook Apps, don’t forget to drop your pin on our new Drop Your Party app!
6) Crowdsourcing
The utility of Facebook in an election is not limited to candidates and voters. Journalists, reporters, and bloggers have at their fingertips a diverse group of Americans to interview, quote, and crowdsource. Ari Shapiro, White House correspondent for National Public Radio noted (in a Facebook Politics live panel discussion) that Facebook provides journalists an inside look at what’s “percolating” in the battleground states before it hits the news.
7) Alternative Voices
In what’s turning out to be the most expensive election in history, third-party and independent candidates face challenges in competing with partisan incumbents and party-backed candidates. In their uphill battle, alternative voices often get muted and overshadowed by the excess of campaign cash fueling the 2012 election.
Facebook can change that. Not only does Facebook offer third-party candidates an alternative avenue to make their voices heard, but it also enables independent organizations to enter the political dialogue. Instead of waiting for media coverage, candidates and organizations can spark conversation online and engage with a community of like-minded individuals.
8) State & Local Elections
State and local elections often times do not get the same amount of attention as the presidential election. In the world of politics, Facebook allows candidates running local campaigns to create a page at no cost. Candidates running in local elections can use social media to create a hub of information on local issues; an invaluable tool in elections where information is harder to come by in the traditional news outlets.
9) Facebook Groups Breed Engagement
Individual voters can not only engage with politicians, issue advocates, and candidates on their personal Facebook accounts, but they can use Facebook Groups to create events and discussion boards with other like-minded voters. Using Facebook, voters can connect and discuss issues that are important to them. Facebook Groups are used as catalysts for action, a tool that has been particularly successful in the organization of political protests, fundraising efforts, get out the vote campaigns, and volunteer movements.
10) Fundraising
One of the many resources available on Facebook is the ability to fundraise by sharing messages that call supporters to action. The Obama campaign prides itself for effectively building a large “grassroots donations” base from millions of small donation supporters. Those fundraising efforts rely on powerful tools made available by Facebook to educate donors and transform them into campaign advocates. The power of a post shared by a friend on Facebook far surpasses the impact of paid advertising. For fundraising, Facebook has created a space for less funded candidates to optimize the social platform.
Have you used Facebook to engage with the 2012 election? Share how in the comments below.






Leave Your Comment →
13 Comments
Shawn M. Griffiths
10.29.2012
@shawntx
What’s interesting about the impact social media has on elections is not just the high level of impact, but how quickly it go to this point. It seems like it really started to take off in 2008 and then it just exploded.
Jane Susskind
10.29.2012
@jsusskind
Yeah, social media was still somewhat of a novelty back in 2008, especially in the political arena. Now it’s become a necessary component of political campaigns. I’m curios to see how it evolves in the next four years and is used in 2016. Completely digital party conventions? Primary debates held on Google+ Hangouts?
Chad Peace
10.29.2012
@Chad_Peace
It amazes me, even at the local level, how few candidates are taking advantage of Facebook and social media. They will spend $100,000 on a mailer that someone will throw away in 5 seconds, but not $10,000 to have active and constant communication with people that will in turn spread their message. Baffling.
Emma Goda
10.29.2012
@emmagoda
I love reading all the political commentary on FB!
Matt Metzner
10.29.2012
@mmetzner
I’m waiting to receive Facebook notifications to go vote on the 6th. Might start following a few candidates to see what they look like.
Michael Higham
10.29.2012
@michaelhigham
Right now, social media is a cost-effective campaign method. Facebook especially. It might be a matter of time before it is eclipsed by another social media platform, but for now, Facebook is pretty useful.
Alex Gauthier
10.29.2012
@alexg
#3 I feel, is what will have the greatest transformative impact going into the future. As fewer people log on instead of tune in, the internet will become even more populated and TV will lose its significance even more.
Cassidy Noblejas Bartolomei
10.29.2012
@cassidynb
I think #8 will become more and more important as candidates learn the benefits of using social media. It would definitely be an aspect of my campaign if I was running for office.
To answer your question at the bottom, I’ve used Facebook to Drop My Party! and learn more about Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson.
Craig D. Schlesinger
10.29.2012
@craigschlesinger
It will be interesting to see the votes-per-campaign-dollar-spent ratio for each candidate. I’m willing to bet that Obama and Romney spend *way* more per vote than, say, Johnson and Stein, who rely almost exclusively on new media to spread their respective messages. I know right now that’s not getting them as far as they’d like, but the writing is on the wall for the future.
Ian Dawes
10.29.2012
@iandawes
Yes, one of the most important avenues here is the presentation of alternative viewpoints, organizations and people can speak their minds and promote their causes and issues to a world of users and the not so politically savvy.
Brenda Fuller Shriver
10.29.2012
I think it makes us more partisan and vicious because we don’t have to look each other in the eye (or even know each other) while we’re speaking our minds. It frees us to be much more rude than we would ordinarily be.
Mike Van Roy
10.29.2012
Candidates are not, but their followers are.
Kevin Hall
10.29.2012
No, but getting the tea billies all riled up is fun.