A Look at Who is Funding Proposition 35

image
Published: 23 Oct, 2012
2 min read

funding proposition 35

Prop 35 would change the legal consequences of human trafficking offenses in California. If passed, the proposition would increase prison sentences, require sex traffickers to register as sex offenders and to disclose all of their internet accounts, require criminal fines to pay for victim services, and mandate law enforcement training on human trafficking. Both sides of the argument have support from attorneys, nonprofits, and sex workers' rights groups which are funding Proposition 35's "Yes" and "No" campaigns.

YES on Prop 35

Proposition 35 is jointly funded by California Against Slavery and the Safer California Foundation. California Against Slavery (CAS) is a non-profit, non-partisan human rights organization dedicated to ending human trafficking in California. The Safer California Foundation, which was created by former Facebook Chief Privacy Officer Chris Kelly, is dedicated to supporting efforts to protect Californians from all forms of criminal exploitation.

Many have endorsed Prop 35, including law enforcement and advocacy groups such as the Peace Officers Research Association and the Crowley Children’s Fund, to name a few.

“Anonymity on the internet has allowed human traffickers access and opportunity to sexually exploit children in our state. Right now, we are missing out on critical data that could protect kids online. By requiring sex offenders to provide information to the authorities about their online accounts we can make the internet a much safer place for California’s children,” Kelly stated.

NO on Prop 35

There are several groups that are against Proposition 35, such as the Exotic Service Providers Legal, Education, and Research Project, which have put together statements arguing that the measure would threaten innocent people by broadening the definition of “pimping.”

These groups see the proposition's definition of human trafficking as vague and worry about prosecution. Cases that involve human trafficking can be difficult to prosecute because victims are often too scared to come forward.

There are many reasons to Vote Yes or No on Proposition 35 and now is the time for you to decide.

To further inform yourself on California propositions visit our election center.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read