Warren Takes Slight Lead in Massachusetts Senate Race
By Shawn M. Griffiths | 09/30/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, US Senate | 4 Comments
Credit: Boston.com
Democrat Elizabeth Warren has inched ahead of Senator Scott Brown in the Massachusetts senate race, according to the latest poll released by the Boston Globe. The race is still incredibly tight and will likely be decided by independent voters.
Statewide polls in Massachusetts have focused on how close the race is between Warren and the Republican incumbent. The latest from the Globe indicates that Elizabeth Warren has gained significant ground on her opponent. She currently has a 43-38 lead, which statistically means that the race is still a dead heat because of the margin of error. However, eighteen percent of voters have yet to decide who they are going to cast their ballot for.
Warren’s campaign has to be satisfied with the most recent poll numbers, especially since the news comes over week after the US Senate candidates took the debate stage for the first time and right before both are scheduled to debate each other again. Six out of the eight polls conducted statewide in September have shown the Democratic challenger with a small lead.
The one factor that is hurting Scott Brown the most in the current election is the ‘R’ next to his name. Brown is a moderate Republican who voters look on favorably because they like him personally and view him as being bipartisan. However, the Globe’s poll reveals that many likely voters have decided to stick with their political party this election season.
Even though she started out trailing in the polls, Elizabeth Warren has the advantage since there are substantially more Democrats in the state than Republicans. The same poll shows a twenty-seven percentage point advantage for President Barack Obama over his GOP opponent Mitt Romney. In both races, the Republican candidates hope to gain some ground in upcoming debates.
Eighteen percent of the electorate in Massachusetts have yet to decisively choose between the two senatorial candidates. This means independent voters are just as important in the 2012 race as they were in the special election in 2010 when Scott Brown surprised many political pundits and analysts when he beat Martha Coakley to succeed the late Ted Kennedy.
Independent voters were already in a position to be a key demographic to appeal to from the beginning. With only six weeks remaining before Election Day, the fact that there are still so many undecided voters will make the senate race is Massachusetts an important one to watch. Republicans can’t afford to lose any seats if they wish to gain majority control in the US Senate.





Leave Your Comment →
4 Comments
Chad Peace
09.30.2012
@Chad_Peace
This is huge news. Brown is not exactly your party-line Republican. Like him or hate him, I got some respect for his willingness to go out there. Would Warren do well for reducing partisanship? I’m not sure the answer to that question is Yes; however much I agree with some things she has said.
Brandon Fallon
09.30.2012
@bfallon
You bring up a good point about Warren’s partisanship. As a first-time candidate, it remains to seen how she will work with Republicans, but she brings a unique background in the financial and academic areas. Maybe she could help convince, or at least clearly articulate, what is at stake in terms of the country’s financial health. She was a registered Republican for most of her life after all.
Brandon Fallon
09.30.2012
@bfallon
It takes a moderate Republican to win state-wide office in Massachusetts and a better than average opponent. Although Brown has moderate views, Warren is no Martha Coakley and has done well advocating better wealth equality and using Brown’s votes in the Senate against him. With Obama on the ballot too, I would be surprised if Warren doesn’t win.
Alex Gauthier
10.01.2012
@alexg
Warren has a ton of support with Independents. I don’t think Brown’s attempts to label her a zany liberal socialist has held much water with voters.