Groups Demand Release of Secret Presidential Debate Contract
By W. E. Messamore | 09/30/2012 | Activism, Elections 2012, Headline, Organizations, President | 25 Comments
Photo: US News and World Report
Eighteen government and media watchdog groups led by Open Debates, called on the Commission on Presidential Debates Thursday to release the secret presidential debate contract negotiated between the two major party campaigns.
The groups included Open Debates, Common Cause, Public Citizen, Rock the Vote, Judicial Watch, Public Campaign, FairVote, Demos, Democracy Matters, League of Rural Voters, Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, Essential Information, Personal Democracy Media, Reclaim Democracy!, Center for Study of Responsive Law, Citizen Works, Free & Equal Elections Foundation, and Rootstrikers.
In a press release, Open Debates reported:
“Robert F. Bauer of the Obama campaign and Benjamin L. Ginsberg of the Romney campaign negotiated a detailed contract that dictates many of the terms of the 2012 presidential debates, including how the format will be structured. The Commission on Presidential Debates, a private corporation created by and for the Republican and Democratic parties, agreed to implement the debate contract. In order to shield the major party candidates from criticism, the Commission on Presidential Debates is concealing the contract from the public and the press.”
The contents of the secret presidential debate contract are especially interesting to watchdog groups this election cycle as the Commission on Presidential Debates draws fire from all sides for a number of controversies.
Earlier this month, the CPD drew criticism from a number of sources for an apparent lack of racial, ideological, and journalistic diversity among its presidential debate moderators.
And in a first for presidential debates, the CPD will be giving the presidential candidates a list of debate topics ahead of time. George Farah of Open Debates said:
“This is a step backward in a presidential debate. It eliminates any surprises and candidates will just cite memorized soundbytes.”
CPD executive director Janet Brown said, “We had been thinking about this for awhile. CPD’s intention is to have the candidates come prepared for a more in-depth conversation.”
The CPD, DNC, and RNC are also facing a lawsuit from the Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson campaign for excluding the ticket from the debates despite its appearance on forty-seven state ballots this November, enough to feasibly take the electoral college votes necessary to win the presidential election. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is also on enough state ballots this election to meet that minimum threshold.
The CPD does not control, nor oversee the contract negotiation process, which happens between the presidential campaigns, but executes the contract after the campaigns have finalized it.




Leave Your Comment →
25 Comments
Chad Peace
09.30.2012
@Chad_Peace
They take public money, they are running for a public office, and they are actively disclosing any additional voices. Why do they get to set the rules in private; there’s no reason for it other than to mutually agree to keep the debate contained between two unpopular parties.
Alex Veras
09.30.2012
Hell yeah
Raymond Davis
09.30.2012
yes but they won’t do it.
Jason Gagnon
09.30.2012
the bi-partisan group should be replaced with a non-partisan one. include Jill Stein and Gary Johnson!
L Dean Latham
09.30.2012
Every Declared candidate should be allowed into the debates. With the cost of getting on the ballots, how else will the American people know who they ALL are?
This simply tells us that the Commission is NOT non partisan as they claim on their site.
L Dean Latham
09.30.2012
Jason… Do you think that Jill and Gary are the only ones? What about TJ O’Hara? There are several others.
L Dean Latham
09.30.2012
http://Www.wewantyou.us gives a short list
Jake Longson
09.30.2012
Yes!!! Nothing should be hidden. Especially since its these two running
Emma Goda
10.01.2012
@emmagoda
I agree nothing should be hidden
Russ Strauss
09.30.2012
So much for transparency.
Bob Rees
09.30.2012
Yes!!
Margaret Bell
09.30.2012
Don’t you know this debate is set up to make Odumbo the winner? It is run by liberals!!! We should all be shouting about this. They are buying this election again by intimidation,free stuff and keeping the blind blind. The media is so far in the tank for Obama it isn’t funny. I can’t wait to see them when the administration takes over the news and you can only say what they tell them to say…this Country is on the rode to destruction if you don’t think so ck out the protest of muslims in Michigan demanding a law against speaking against their DEAD god .mohammed!!! Bet you haven’t seen that on the liberal media…
Wayne Rogers
09.30.2012
Yes
Wayne Rogers
09.30.2012
Margaret, it has nothing to do with the media any more. At first maybe, but Romney has ruined his chances on his own now. The debate is a waste of time, not because anyone bought anyone, but because the Republicans failed to find a reasonable representative.
Edward Theilmann
09.30.2012
Everything about politics should be very public !
Richard de Freitas
09.30.2012
Very Simple, if they can’t be forthright in a debate, what kind of president do you think either of them would make. Government of the People, by the People, for the People, ha ha ha ha ha!
Leo Zicc
09.30.2012
what are the two paties so afraid of?
Gil Sery
10.01.2012
They’re afraid of losing their monopoly on government, and scared ****less that someone will actually lead this country back to the real democracy it was designed to be.
David Tilove
10.01.2012
Yes
Susan Corkran
10.01.2012
Yes
Stormoak Lonewind
10.01.2012
interesting……
Ernie Knopp
10.01.2012
yes
Mareike Lucht
10.01.2012
@malu
transparency is key in order to be a true representative for the people. It should be remembered that this is a presidential election and not a hollywood casting. The more people know about these behind the scene agreements, the more they might reconsider their choice they have to make on November 6.
Alex Gauthier
10.01.2012
@alexg
That list of media watchdogs is extensive. Getting a look at how watered down the contract is should show how unwilling both candidates are to talk about the serious issues.
Terri Harel
10.01.2012
@tlharel
This doesn’t seem too surprising but is discouraging nonetheless and just highlights the degeneration of the democratic process in this country.