Groups Demand Release of Secret Presidential Debate Contract

image
Wes MessamoreWes Messamore
Published: 30 Sep, 2012
2 min read
Photo: US News and World Report

Eighteen government and media watchdog groups led by Open Debates, called on the Commission on Presidential Debates Thursday to release the secret presidential debate contract negotiated between the two major party campaigns.

The groups included Open Debates, Common Cause, Public Citizen, Rock the Vote, Judicial Watch, Public Campaign, FairVote, Demos, Democracy Matters, League of Rural Voters, Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, Essential Information, Personal Democracy Media, Reclaim Democracy!, Center for Study of Responsive Law, Citizen Works, Free & Equal Elections Foundation, and Rootstrikers.

In a press release, Open Debates reported:

"Robert F. Bauer of the Obama campaign and Benjamin L. Ginsberg of the Romney campaign negotiated a detailed contract that dictates many of the terms of the 2012 presidential debates, including how the format will be structured. The Commission on Presidential Debates, a private corporation created by and for the Republican and Democratic parties, agreed to implement the debate contract. In order to shield the major party candidates from criticism, the Commission on Presidential Debates is concealing the contract from the public and the press."

The contents of the secret presidential debate contract are especially interesting to watchdog groups this election cycle as the Commission on Presidential Debates draws fire from all sides for a number of controversies.

Earlier this month, the CPD drew criticism from a number of sources for an apparent lack of racial, ideological, and journalistic diversity among its presidential debate moderators.

And in a first for presidential debates, the CPD will be giving the presidential candidates a list of debate topics ahead of time. George Farah of Open Debates said:

"This is a step backward in a presidential debate. It eliminates any surprises and candidates will just cite memorized soundbytes."

CPD executive director Janet Brown said, "We had been thinking about this for awhile. CPD's intention is to have the candidates come prepared for a more in-depth conversation."

The CPD, DNC, and RNC are also facing a lawsuit from the Libertarian Party's Gary Johnson campaign for excluding the ticket from the debates despite its appearance on forty-seven state ballots this November, enough to feasibly take the electoral college votes necessary to win the presidential election. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is also on enough state ballots this election to meet that minimum threshold.

IVP Donate

The CPD does not control, nor oversee the contract negotiation process, which happens between the presidential campaigns, but executes the contract after the campaigns have finalized it.

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read