Study Shows News Corp Misleads on Climate Change
By Taylor Tyler | 09/26/2012 | Headline, Issues, Organizations, Science | 26 Comments
Credit: epltalk.com
A study released Friday by the Union of Concerned Scientists shows News Corp misleads on climate change. The UCS reports that two of the most popular news outlets in the US, Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, do not appropriately handle the issue.
Ninety-three percent of Fox News’ representations of climate science, and 81 percent of representations found in the Wall Street Journal’s opinion section were misleading, according to the report.
The UCS examined transcripts and articles relating to climate change and global warming and reports that over a six-month period, 37 out of 40 instances that aired during Fox’s prime time coverage were classified as misleading. Over the course of a year, 39 out of 48 instances in the Wall Street Journal’s opinion section were classified as misleading.
According to the analysis, misleading claims by Fox News personalities and Wall Street Journal contributors were found to include, “broad dismissals of human-caused climate change, rejections of climate science as a body of knowledge, and disparaging comments about individual scientists.” Some discussions went as far as to “denigrate climate science by either promoting distrust in scientists and scientific institutions or placing acceptance of climate change in an ideological, rather than fact-based, context.”
In one example cited by UCS and aired on Fox News on March 23, Rush Limbaugh states, “The green energy stuff – I mean, that’s – that’s all a hoax and a fraud based on another hoax and fraud, global warming.”
Another instance examined an op-ed article written by Robert Tracinski and published in the Wall Street Journal in March that states, “We are in the middle of what you might call a global warming bubble. It is a failure of the global warming theory itself and the credibility of its advocates.”
The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that climate change is real and can be proven with the large body of research available. A report issued in August by the American Meteorological Society concludes that the warming of Earth’s atmosphere, rising sea levels, and shrinking ice levels can be mainly attributed to human activity since the 1950s.
An article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences examined the publications of 1,372 climate scientists and found 97 to 98 percent agree that climate change is occurring and mainly attributable to humans.
Despite these scientific findings, according to a recent Gallup poll, much of the American public still doubts that climate change is currently occurring. A poll from March shows that only 52 percent of people polled believe the effects of global warming have already begun to happen, down from 61 percent in a similar poll released in 2008.
The UCS report notes how influential media is on public perception, citing a study conducted in February:
“The importance the media assigns to coverage of climate change translates into the importance the public attaches to this issue.”
A study published in the scientific journal “EMBO Reports“ suggests interest groups may influence media coverage on climate change:
“Historically entrenched cultural preoccupations with free markets and economic growth—along with the concomitant politics of interest groups—has also caused an attitude of denial that has strengthened scepticism of scientific claims about environmental decline and, more specifically, anthropogenic climate change.”
The same study cites “balanced reporting” as having a “rather detrimental effect” on media coverage relating to climate change. Claiming balance is often “a surrogate for validity checks” if the article gives undue attention to views held by a small minority of the scientific community.
In 2007, News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch said, “I think that when people see that 99 percent of scientists agree about the serious extend of global warming, it’s going to become a fact of life,” and issued a 2011 memo announcing that News Corp had met its goal of becoming carbon neutral.
The Carbon Disclosure Project, a UK based organization that works with corporations to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, released a 2012 report showing News Corp ranked number 19 out of 343 participating S&P 500 companies.
The misleading climate change discussion is not limited to American media owned by Murdoch. An Australian study conducted by the Australian Center for Independent Journalism claims that Murdoch-owned News Ltd, one of Australia’s largest media companies, has reported negatively 81 percent of the time on Australian government carbon policy.
“In their reporting of the Gillard government’s carbon policy it’s fair to say they’ve campaigned against it rather than covered it,” reported study author Professor Wendy Bacon.
Other mainstream media outlets are far from innocent in their lack of reporting climate change. A Media Matters study published in August claims “only 8.7% of television segments and 25.5% of print articles reported on record-breaking July heat waves in the context of climate change.”
UCS concludes their report by offering a recommendation to Murdoch: “News Corp needs to help its staff to differentiate between opinion about climate change and scientific facts. And while it is appropriate to question new science as it emerges, it is misleading to reject or sow doubt about established science – in this case, the overwhelming body of evidence that human-caused climate change is occurring.”





Leave Your Comment →
26 Comments
Alex Gauthier
09.26.2012
@alexg
Wow this issue is clearly a major concern for many. Is the scientific community really held in such low regard?
Lucas Eaves
09.26.2012
@lucaseaves
It is scary to see how one man can shape an issue the way he wants and influence so many people. And he can do that in a number of countries. It is a known fact that the candidate endorse by Murdoch in England is likely to win. He endorse Tony Blair then Cameron. If from the beginning of the republican primary race, Fox News had been behind Romney, he would be way more like by conservative now. This is very good example of how important having independents media is !
John MacAulay IV
09.26.2012
Uhm, upon further research, it looks like the “union of concerned scientists” is anything but non-partisan.
Nannette Durieux
09.26.2012
Steven Monroe
09.26.2012
The overwhelming evidence is that there is no overwhelming evidence, other than the fact that the earth undergoes periodic climactic change, regardless of which species is dominant on the earth. That the environmental extremists have bent the science to serve their agenda is well established. That we can have even the slightest impact on short or long term climactic change through our action or inaction is not. That you pose as a page for propagation of liberal agenda, rather than a source for examining the strengths and weaknesses all candidates is also very clear.
Richard Boehme
09.26.2012
Ain’t that the truth. So much falsified data that has been disproved. Thank you al gore for your lies. All to engrandize himself.
Scott T Templeman
09.26.2012
UCS is the 4th largest grant taker in the CC research arena (a multi-billion dollar enterprise), their own bias on how they would prefer the news gets reported would be silly to over look
Brenda Garner
09.26.2012
Global warming has been a hoax from the start. When I was in college, it was global cooling.
Rick London
09.26.2012
Of course the studies are mixed (depending on who sponsored them) as that is true in just about any multiple studies. However, my wife and I live right on the edge of a National Forest and we can assure you there is reason to be concerned about climate change. If magnolias just now blooming in October that used to bloom in early June doesn’t convince you then surely tornadoes in October and November (sometimes almost daily) should; but for the truly jaded, hurricanes year round when they used to only hit us (grew up near New Orleans) in only July and August outta do the trick. If you are living in a city or concrete jungle; all this might be meaningless as you see so little of nature you may hardly notice you live on a planet loaded with nature. But we hike and see it daily. Many of the animals we used to see in their season are now gone due to the climate, wildfires and drought. But again, you’d have to be up close and personal; and then no study in the world could convince you otherwise; unless your IQ is 10; there’s big climate change/global warming issues on this planet. Hence Obama (who actually understands it) has our vote.
Kris McDade
09.26.2012
for everyone who doesn’t think we are damaging the planet i vote you get to starve first…..since you think it isn’t happening surely you will agree that food should go to those who are trying to stop it?
Johnny Ritchie
09.26.2012
Yes. 50 years ago where I live in Tennessee we had 3 – 6 snows every year with homemade ice cream and snow sledding. Today we are lucky to see a snow in three years. Also this past summer/year the heat hit a month earlier and was the hottest I have felt!
Douglas Neslund
09.26.2012
I am convinced that News Corp ought to continue to expose the political motives behind this scam. It’s the sun, stupid! Any allegation that man has any significant role in climate change is both illogical and incredibly aggrandizing. Do we pollute the air and water? Of course! Should we stop doing that if possible? Absolutely! But to pit our pitiful efforts against the power of the sun is not only misleading, it’s wrong! Independent Voter is now exposed as a leftist shill group, exposed by this article!
Jan Sutton Duren
09.26.2012
News Corp should lose it’s FCC license! It is a propaganda machine not a news organization. What they practice is nothing close to journalism.
Stefanie Mastro
09.26.2012
It’s hard to imagine shifting towards renewable and less polluting energy sources as being apart of some villainous agenda. How can anyone possibly be against less pollution and using resources that cannot be depleted? Are they living on another planet where they and their descendents aren’t subject to the air, water, etc. here? This should not be a partisan issue! We are sharing a limited amount of space that does not have inexhaustible resources and the population growth rate is exponential. Everyone should be focused on finding ways to generate renewable sustainable energy so that our species can continue to survive.
Jonny Vee
09.26.2012
So, News Corp = FOX. If Fox is giving us the tainted data, then how in 10,000 hells can the blame fall on Al Gore? And to say “It’s just the SUN’ – The SUN has gone through these Cycles before and even in the last recorded 100 years of weather: It has never been THIS Bad.
Rick London
09.26.2012
So News Corp (or Fox) is claiming to be smarter than (Our Generation’s Einstein) Steven Hawking who KNOWS there is climate/change global warming. Bill O’Reilly/Sean Hannity/Vs S. Hawking for IQ? Sounds legit. LOL.
Paul Grajciar
09.26.2012
They should rename it Flat Earth News.
Philip Drucker
09.26.2012
News Corp exists for two reasons: 1. To allow rich individuals to print more money and 2. Show re-runs of the Simpsons. If there is a third reason I have yet to discern it.
Gary Arend
09.26.2012
Why is this on a voter page? Global warming is not a factor in this election. The planet has experienced hotter & colder periods even without human involvement. The time periods mentioned above are ludicrous when talking about planetary science. The only way you can negate our impact is to reduce our numbers. All the solar panels, windmills, and Prius don’t mean crap. And Fox is no more biased than NBC who is owned in part by GE who has a vested interest in promoting costly alternative energy.
Dennis Pederson
09.26.2012
Just because an organization has the word ‘News’ in their name doesn’t mean they are interested in reporting news.
Dennis Pederson
09.26.2012
Well Mr. Arend, it should be a factor in this election.
Independent Voter
09.27.2012
We would like to remind our readers that we have been exposed as “leftist conspiracy lovers” as well as “Ron Paul lemmings”. We publish articles written by people from all across the political spectrum that respect our etiquette guidelines. You might agree with some articles, disagree with others, but please do so respectfully and substantiate your statements.
Paul Grajciar
09.27.2012
Oh.. Now I see. Playing both sides of the fence. The nerve! :-0
Fred Valenzano
09.27.2012
Disagree because UCS has proven themselves many times over 20+ years to be biased / slanted. This is in no way a balanced effort, just an attempt by UCS to give like-leaning news outlets something to use to thump on Fox.
Hari Ziznewski
10.18.2012
@rotjjj
Is Big Oil making fake science to contend Man-Made Climate Change??
Are those who would tax carbon emissions making fake science to facilitate Man-Made Climate Change??
Which conspiracy theory is it??
Is the truth somewhere in between??
Do people want the actual truth, what ever it may be??
greenguy79766.livejournal.com
11.13.2012
t figure our way out of our consumerist addictions we will eventually have to go
cold turkey. This can impact both worldwide and local patterns of climate
and atmosphere-ocean circulation. And these changes
will not suit human life as it is.