Mayor Bloomberg Continues to Push for Gun Control Laws
By Brenda Evans | 08/27/2012 | Headline, New York, Safety | 38 Comments
Minutes before the Empire State Building shooting on Friday, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg discussed the need for stricter and reinforced gun control laws across the nation.
On John Gambling’s radio show, Bloomberg recounted the recent killings across the nation and in his own city that he believes could have been prevented by stricter gun control laws.
“We are the only developed country in the world with this problem,” he said.
The shooting outside the Empire State Building left two dead, including the shooter, and nine wounded by stray police bullets.
“New York City, as you know, is the safest big city in the country, and we are on pace to have a record low number of murders this year, but we are not immune to the national problem of gun violence,” Mayor Bloomberg said in a press conference.
According to The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, New York has the fourth-strictest gun laws among U.S. states.
Although shooter, Jeffrey Johnson, purchased the weapon legally in 21 years ago in Florida, he did not have a permit to carry the gun in New York City.
It is that type of dismissal of the law that Bloomberg wants to crack down on.
After the Colorado shooting in July, Mayor Bloomberg, an independent, urged that both Romney and Obama get specific about their plans for gun control laws.
“No matter where you stand on the Second Amendment, no matter where you stand on guns, we have a right to hear from both of them concretely, not just in generalities,” he said his weekly radio appearance.
Obama called for reinstating the expired federal ban on assault weapons during his 2008 campaign, but he has not done so since assuming office.
Mitt Romney on the other hand, backed certain gun control measures in Massachusetts but now presents himself as a strong Second Amendment supporter.
Bloomberg believes that it is the undecided and independent voters that will be the ones demanding answers from either side.
David Kopel of the CATO Institute believes that tightening gun laws as Bloomberg promotes would just create a backlash from owners. He suggests that tracking large ammunition purchases would subject innocent people to profiling.
According to Kopel, an average recreational target shooter can easily go through 4,000 or 5,000 rounds a month.
“There is nothing suspicious about buying a thousand rounds at a time. If you want to create a government list of people exercising their rights, you can do that, but if the police are supposed to investigate everyone who buys ammunition in bulk, they will have time to do nothing else,” Kopel said.
A 2011 Gallup poll shows that people are nearly gridlocked over Congress passing stricter gun control laws. (“Strongly oppose” was only one percentage point ahead of “strongly support”.)
Karen Finney, MSNBC Political Analyst, is tired of the politics surrounding the issue.
“The NRA fought so viciously against any kind of national database or tracking system out of the ‘protection of second amendment rights,’” she said. “We have to balance those second amendment rights with the safety and security of our people.”
Bloomberg promotes a nonpartisan stance on the issue in his coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. He depicts it as an issue that is not conservative or liberal, but one of law and order, and life or death.





Leave Your Comment →
38 Comments
Matt Metzner
08.27.2012
@mmetzner
There has been plenty of buzz on gun control lately that it would be surprising if no action was taken anywhere.
BGS
08.27.2012
Bloomberg Speaks Again! Our Citizen Kane for the 21st Century. He sits and will continue to sit fat, dumb, and self righteous in his rarefied world. The rest of us who are lucky enough to work, pay taxes, and try to be productive citizens live daily with the potential of becoming victims of criminals. Violent crime is not unique to NYC but at least in the rest of New York State, citizens have a fighting chance. In addition to law abiding gun owners being more common, at least in my county, we also have a closer and more trusting relationship with local law enforcement that supports a responsible armed citizenry. We do not pretend to do their dangerous job but we are extra eyes and ears. It is understood that every dangerous criminal lawfully stopped by law abiding gun owners is one less POS they may have to chase down some dark street. This is the best crime deterrent one can have. It is not an “Us versus Them” environment. Thankfully, the balance of NYS is not about to allow itself to become a sixth borough.
Brandon Fallon
08.27.2012
@bfallon
These acts of violence seem to do more to spread public awareness about gun control then any other method. Gun control is not about locking up all guns that are not in the hands of law enforcement (which is what some ultraconservatives are saying Obama wants to do) but making sure there is a national standard or at least a greater sense of working-together so that background checks are more thorough and that there are limits on how much ammunition you can buy in a month.
Robert Reynolds
08.27.2012
@Robert Reynolds
As the Chair of the Public Safety Committee of Manhattan Community Board 12, I will be holding a Public Hearing in support of a resolution for passage of NYS Senate Bill S1427 & S1863 with an emphasis on personal self-defense, education & firearm training for women.
September 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM
Isabella
515 Audubon Avenue
New York, NY 10040
[email protected]
If you live in New York State feel free to take a look at the information that I will be presenting as well as sign my on-line petition included at the link below. I hope that you will come out and support me as I support you. Fraternally.
http://cavalierknight.com/documents.html
Brenda Evans
08.27.2012
@brenda
Banning guns is not the aim of most politicians, it is the regulation of sales and permits that they hope will send a red flag when someone of unsound mental health or suspicious behavior is trying to purchase a gun. Even the NRA is in favor of sensible gun control. http://www.npr.org/2012/07/27/157469718/new-republic-nra-members-support-gun-control
Larry D. Avants
08.27.2012
Perhaps the NYC mayors monies would be better spent, if he quit sending his investigators to Arizona to investigate our gun shows, and put that money to range time for his police officers. 9 wounded and 1 killed. At least here we are taught that we are also responsible for those rounds that don’t find their intended target. I hope New York City gets their pants sued off by those wounded victims…
James Don
08.27.2012
And those are the police that they want you to trust yours, and your families lives to, after they disarm you. What a joke!
BGS
08.27.2012
The law abiding gun owners are not now, and never were, against reasonable measures to ensure guns do not end up in the wrong hands. The new buzzword for the advocates of stricter gun control use in NYS is “reasonable”. “Reasonable” by whose definition? The so called sincerity of the “reasonable” gun control advocates is no longer accepted and with good reasons. Every time their “reasonable” measures were enacted, the only criminals they affected were the brand new criminals created by the new legislation that were solid, productive, law abiding people before and never harmed anyone. The last recent example of this was Governor Pataki and his miraculous “5 Point Plan” to cure the disease of gun violence in NYS (which included COBIS, by the way). So called Assault Weapons (by Federal definition at the time) were also banned in that legislative package. How truly effective was this and how many real violent criminals did it stop? How many more innocent victims did it create instead? Why do we need anything additional? We are the only state with the Sullivan Law. For there to be sincere consensus on this issue (per Gov. Cuomo), the gun control advocates have to be prepared to support the repeal of most of the prior counterproductive, misdirected, and worthless legislation as a showing of good faith (including NYC Title 38-Go read it). Until that happens, even well meaning gun control advocates will continue to be viewed suspiciously as self-seeking liars because of prior example.
Todd Daniel
08.27.2012
I think Bloomberg should read the Constitution and then be quiet for a while.
Donny Zaltzberg
08.27.2012
I think gun control, is only put in place by criminals, who plan violence on the citizenry, look at all the place where Democide has tasken place. When a criminal gov gets worried about the citizens, they steal their guns and apply a jack boot to the throats of the citizens. No non criminal gov would want to disarm the citizens!
Donny Zaltzberg
08.27.2012
Julia Smucker
08.27.2012
“Bloomberg promotes a nonpartisan stance on the issue in his coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns. He depicts it as an issue that is not conservative or liberal, but one of law and order, and life or death.”
My respect for him just went way up.
Leo Zicc
08.27.2012
i dont think its a party issue so therefore not to be addressed at any convention. its one more way to polorize the parties.
John Tanzi
08.27.2012
good i hope the criminals and crooks abide to these laws.
Jeff Smith
08.27.2012
if prefer this gun control:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/253514.html
Jess Kalinowsky
08.27.2012
A GUN yeas!!! Without a doubt. BUT the Amendment did not say a WORD about ASSULT RIFLES such as a AK47!!!! or any such weapon to have multi cartridges to KILL or MAIM dozens of people at a time. GUN in the HOME, fine, NOT so fine in a Movie Theatre or at a Place of Worship. BIG DIFFERENCE FOLKS BIG DIFFERENCE!
Larry D. Avants
08.27.2012
Yow, that gun in your home does you alot of good if you are in a THEATRE for instance!!!!!!!!!
Mike Dodson
08.27.2012
If all the people in charge who profess to care so much about gun laws please tell me why when some thug is arrested the first charge to be ple barganed away is the use of a handgun charge. More laws are a joke.
Ronald Bostic
08.27.2012
no guns for us,more power to the oligarchs!
Dean Linney
08.27.2012
IVN, quit with the gun control crap. Our government is bankrupt, both fiscally and morally. They are stealing our money to pay for wars we don’t belong in, bailing out companies and banks that should have failed and our teachers are paid less than our politicians. Guns? really?
Joy Archa
08.27.2012
well if he gets it passed –I hope the criminals goes after him first—-so he will know what hes doing-
Kevin Driscoll
08.27.2012
Don’t trample on my Constitutional Rights Bloomberg !! You want to be the Head Nanny of the Nanny State, NO THANKS BEAT IT !!
Fred Gollatz
08.27.2012
I think guns and all the issues that everyone that doesn’t like about them are being used by politicions as attention getters for voters, the truth about them is being muddied by them. Guns save more innocent lives every day than they take and they are a second amendment right of all American citizens. Bloomberg only showes his ignorance by trying to place the blame for societies failures on guns. He needs to look at the training of his Police officers who carry legally and still manage to shoot 9 innocent bystanders because their lack of proper firearms training and stop on his personal crusade to remove Americans constitutional rights. He is a failure as a mayor and an American..
Kevin Driscoll
08.27.2012
Vote Gary Johnson to restore our Constitutional solvency, the only candidate that will repeal the Patriot Act and NDAA. http://www.garyjohnson2012.com
Paul Grajciar
08.27.2012
This is getting ridiculous. It is a question of the variety of deadly weapons available. And closing the loopholes that enable freaks to get their hands on them. I don’t think a hand gun ban is do-able. But no one in this country needs to own an automatic rifle.
James Don
08.27.2012
It is already illegal to own an automatic rifle.
What’s getting riciculous is people pushing for legislation they have no idea about, or even the extent of legislation that already exists. It’s become the new hipster norm…
Step 1) Hear an opinion from authoritarian pundits/politicians.
Step 2) Do absolutely NO research on the topic.
Step 3) Yell at the top of your lungs for everyone to change their lives because you don’t agree with them.
Step 4) Push garbage, useless legislation to prevent things you cannot logically prevent, layering it on top of already restrictive legislation that does nothing to solve the problem, merely hide it even more, and make life worse for law abiding citizens.
Step 5) Blame the people who disagree with you for the mess you made.
Sound familiar Paul? Also, even though automatic weapons are illegal in this country, requiring a federal permit costing thousands of dollars just to own a REPLICA (and good luck actually getting approval unless youre famous or topexmil), it is merely your OPINION that you don’t need an automatic. I don’t own one, and never will, but neither my opinion, or yours, is law.
Edward Theilmann
08.27.2012
Outlaw guns and the only people who will have them are the criminals and the government .No thanks
Kevin Driscoll
08.27.2012
Ever try to buy an Automatic Weapon? The process is long and expensive, the Feds will check you out thoroughly before you can get the stamp to purchase one and they are extremely expensive. There has been a ban on importation facilitating there scarcity and making the price go through the roof. Got a spare 25K to purchase one? The assault rifles that most talk about are semi automatic hunting rifles that have a black plastic housing making them look like military grade. IF THEY OUTLAW WEAPONS ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE WEAPONS.
Matt Hawkins
08.27.2012
Uh, DUh, Hell Yes!! Public safety seems to be the highest priority when we look at national defense but no bug deal when we get to the states?? Really….
David Prowse
08.27.2012
Until Bloomberg has a police force that can shoot straight, he should stfu and let those that can, open-carry.
David Prowse
08.27.2012
Automatic weapons are not for hunting. It’s to remind the corrupt government that we the people have them.
Justin Buell
08.27.2012
Heil Bloomberg! Das Fuhrer has spoken!
George Bennett
08.27.2012
This nut case would disarm NY’s finest if he had his way & put ‘Billy Sticks’ back in the hands of beat cops!
Karol Schilling
08.27.2012
I ned my gun to protect myself from the criminals with their guns!!!
Mark Marchesi
08.27.2012
Paul Grajciar, in Switzerland, every male, 20-30 yrs old is issued an “Assault Weapon” to keep in their home. Meaning that every home has one, yet their crime rate is very low. Why is that? Respect and Accountability. You comment on an issue as if you know what you’re talking about, yet you’re only making yourself look foolish.
If the politicians were really serious about gun crime, they would not allow plea bargins to take place in the judicial system. They would make laws and penalties so harsh that violent criminals would spend their life behind bars, away from the law abiding, for violating them. However, its much easier, and safer for a politician to violate the rights of the law abiding. I mean, making it harder for criminals could prove hazardous to ones health, and the politicians know that. Besides, when they talk about gun control, health care, abortion, and all other things that don’t matter in in the big scheme of things, the brainless forget about the big issues, like the economy, war, and the fact we are losing our country to the establishment.
Anytime you regulate or ban something that the American People want, they will get it by illegal means; thus putting more of a tax burden on society to enforce it. Allow people do live free, and punish harshly those who victimize.
Brenda Evans
08.27.2012
@brenda
Mr. Marchesi,
I do not claim to be an expert on the topic.
While I am aware of the Swiss gun laws, the men given assault riffles serve as the equivalent of the nations army and are still subject to background checks. Policies are not easily transplanted into other countries. Such a culture takes centuries to create.
Discussing social issues is not meant to make “the brainless forget about the big issues.” It should enhance our ability to solve these problems as well as the problems with the economy and national defense.
Mayor Bloomberg has stated that he is addressing the issue from the judicial angle by aiming to raise minimum sentencing, which makes a harsher penalty as you suggest. How you believe the issue of violent crimes should be solved in our nation?
James Don
08.27.2012
Brenda I find it joyfulyl ironic that when presented with Marks argument, the first excuse you turn to is “Policies are not easily transplanted into other countries”. Wow, you mean… Europe is much more homogenous, and in no way, a legit comparison for statistics in the USA? Shocking.
I know you might not know it, but thats a mindblowing revelation for someone on your side of the fence. I wish everyone who was in support of disarmament or government tracking of weapons.. ( you know.. since European stats are their strongest leg to stand on.. even though correlation, not causation and all that), would have an epiphany like this. We have been trying to explain this to people who want to ban or track guns that for almost a decade. When is it going to sink in?
You mean, other countries have other factors that should be accounted for when discussing their gun control laws and crime/murder rates? Things like population density, wealth disparity, poverty levels, unemployment, family structures and home life, location and area size, regional identity and homogenization of peoples, medical quality availability, education availability, as well even things like stress and quality of life? Shocking… Everyone who wants to ban guns always seems to leave that part out and indicate that citizens owning guns is the reason for these tragedies. I guess you feel it’s ok to leave these stipulations out when it is in support of gun control, but suddenly, it’s not ok to leave those factors out when you have examples of high gun ownership countries not having problems though… right?
Perhaps if people started focusing on the actual problems and causes of violence in this country, the gun violence as well as every other weapon violence would go down, and without destroying the Constitution, or leaving a hundred million people suddenly unarmed and unable to defend themselves if they need to. How about firearm education, training and teaching people, (and yes responsible young adults as well) that guns are tools. Dangerous and very deadly tools, but tools, nonetheless, with a real purpose for hundreds of millions of people in this country, and billions, around the globe. How about fixing the economy, the health care system, the insurance system, the oligarchy and crony capitalism, the crooked banks, politicians and unions? There are hundreds of things in this country that are fubar, so how about instead of taking away people’s liberties and leaving them defenseless, waiting for the bumbling boys in blue and their 14 minutes average response time, you could fix the PROBLEMS instead of trying to bandaid these situations.
Jeff LeMay
08.27.2012
Don’t tread on me