Jerry Brown and Crossing Party Lines to Save California
By Bob Morris | 08/20/2012 | Budget, California | 22 Comments
Credit: ocregister.com
When Jerry Brown became governor of California in 2011 he disappeared from public view for six months, spending much time talking to Republicans, crossing party lines in an attempt to work out a grand deal on the California budget. It didn’t work.
Instead, Brown hit a brick wall. “Jerry’s had sort of an Obama trajectory,” says Raphael Sonenshein, executive director of the Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs.
At first, he spent more time with the Republicans than Arnold [Schwarzenegger] did. But like Obama, Jerry didn’t understand he could do nothing with them and get nothing from them. I don’t think he fully grasped the cynical dynamics of the current Republican Party.
But the intractability and cynicism wasn’t coming just from the Republican side. Republicans certainly (and quite fairly) said Democrats weren’t budging on pension reform and spending cuts, just as Democrats said Republicans remained immovable on the possibility of tax increases.
A high school history teacher said, “When compromise breaks down, war breaks out,” which is certainly true of state legislatures too. A friend volunteered with a peace group to help end a vicious civil war in another country and was involved in negotiations at a high level. The most important lesson he learned was that if everyone says they want compromise and an end to war but the war keeps going, then everyone involved is probably getting some benefit, like political power or financial support, by continuing the hostilities. Perhaps some of that same process is paralyzing California politics too.
Gov. Brown and President Obama did try to cross party lines. I’m sure some Republicans tried to meet them halfway too. But even though our partisan divides may seem insurmountable, we need to keep trying, because time is running out, especially for California.
The California budget deficit continues to grow, forcing ever more borrowing and accounting tricks to keep the lights on. But this is a shell game. Sooner or later the game will be over. California services, schools, roads, and infrastructure are decaying at an alarming rate. The ogre of unfunded public pension liability lurks just over the horizon.
Gov. Brown is now betting everything on voters passing Proposition 30 in November. It would provide anywhere from $6.8 to 9 billion in new tax revenue. If it passes, things will still be dire for California. If it doesn’t pass, then the budget cuts California has experienced so far will seem minor compared to what will come.
From an interview with Gov. Brown by Marc Cooper.
Let’s say you do achieve victory. Today we have a $16 billion deficit. Your tax increase will meet only half of that.
We need more cuts.
Back to cuts?
We need half cuts, half taxes. I keep saying that.
Even with this initiative?
Or double. It’s either $16 billion or $8 billion. That’s the issue. You can’t stop the cuts—we’re living beyond our means.
Crossing party lines and coming together may be the only way to solve the crisis because it’s clear that protracted partisanship just makes things worse.





Leave Your Comment →
22 Comments
Matt Metzner
08.20.2012
@mmetzner
You’re dead on. It’s a damn shame that Californians bear the burden of partisanship as both groups fail to compromise.
Dan
08.20.2012
Bob, I’m sure you’re aware California now only requires a majority to pass the state budget. Your comment seems to indicate a 2/3 vote is required
Kathy Jones
08.20.2012
brown a corrupt hack. Should had been investigated when he was AG and dropped the charges on the CCPOA president about the same time he received a few million.
Michael Snider
08.20.2012
The California political system. Term limits and abuse of the initiative process have created a dysfunctional nightmare which empowers special interests like public employees’ unions such as the CCPOA and CTA. The state needs a new Constitution badly.
Bob Morris
08.20.2012
One of the biggest problems is that a 2/3′s vote required to pass a budget. Plus, the broken and gamed proposition system which mandates that money be spent but doesn’t provide a source of funding.
Beverly Farmer Price
08.20.2012
It takes two to compromise, but for some strange reason we tend to hold the person who wants to compromise responsible for the failure to reach a compromise. I wonder who thought that up?
Duane Dichiara
08.20.2012
Bob – The 2/3 requirement to pass a budget changed a couple years ago. It is now 50%+1. That means the Democrats, who control both houses, are totally in control and responsible for state government.
Tom Kaptain
08.20.2012
I have never thought Sonnenschien knew much about what went on in Sacramento and this shows it. If you want to compare what has happyed in Sacramento with what is going on in Washington, there is no comparison which is a part of why California’s government is starting to show some improvement in their financial numbers.
Eleanor Pickron
08.20.2012
Brown is a totally weird mix.
Barbara Byram
08.20.2012
Republicans only care is that THEY have all the power…country or state be damned.
Joseph Michael Pedro III
08.20.2012
this is exactly what happens when a state is run by large groups of sociopaths for large groups of sociopaths. and then California wonders why so many residents move to Nevada. maybe if the left-wingers in Los Angeles and the Bay area did not run the state’s government California might have lower taxes and a better government. socialism is a proven failure. until these knuckleheads in California realize that fact, the tax-payers will continue to bend over and grab their ankles. (:P
Steve Stratton
08.20.2012
Party Politics. If the party leadership tells you to vote a certain way, you do or else you can kiss you political career goodbye. Neither party will truly compromise and do what is best for the State economy. Getting reelected is their number one priority!!!!
Scot Douglas
08.20.2012
Uh, compromise in this case would have consisted solely of the GOP signing off on huge tax increases (and a stupid high speed train) without serious cuts in government spending on things that the government shouldn’t be doing
Michael Sullivan
08.20.2012
If the Republican Plutocracy would only give us a little more, they would get back 10 tims more ! What don’t they understand ? Why do we have to fight them for every penny ! Spreading the wealth benefits everyone, and they will get back 10 times more ! The Republicans have sold our “DEMOCRACY” !!!
Brock Young
08.20.2012
There is no compromise with people who have no principles. GOV Brown would like the Republicans to once again compromise their principles, go against the founding principles of fiscal and personal responsibility, and smaller government, in order to increase taxes and regulation. This isn’t “crossing party lines,” this is down and out dirty politics. Never mind the California government already takes in more money than it should be able to spend.
The problem with the Republican side of things is that they have given too much, for too long, to democrats who only want to take, change, redistribute, take, change, and redistribute. Republicans in CA have become nothing more than dem-lite, losing their Conservative principles, and losing many “Republicans” like myself who became a registered Independent 5 years ago.
I would rather nothing get done, than taking any more steps down the wrong path.
Duane Dichiara
08.20.2012
Reminder again folks Republicans have virtually no impact over politics in Sacramento.
Chris TheBruce
08.20.2012
Brown’s agenda is clear, his actions show exactly where his loyalties lie. The Dims control CA politics and they try to blame the Repugs… Example one – Fund college educations for illegal aliens’ children thru the CALGrant system and then deny the same grant to citizens in “private colleges”. Trade schools that are not part of the govts’ Junior College system and have stronger educational standards. Raise property taxes, raise sales taxes, raise taxes, raise taxes, raise taxes… Wake up Sheeple!!!
Chris TheBruce
08.20.2012
IV you should be ashamed for this post… Kerry Brown is standing in the way of compromise.
Bruce Stevens
08.20.2012
Jerry Brown wasn’t worth a crap the first time he was Governor and now he is even a bigger liberal stooge
Lance Willis
08.20.2012
A Demo Gov…..and Demo control of both houses…… should be able to do whatever they want………..
Michael Snider
08.20.2012
@Joseph – Nevada’s the only other state doing just as poorly as California, so I wouldn’t point to NV as a paradise. I think CA loses more people to OR than to NV these days anyways. Nevertheless California has some extremely serious problems. Brown the first time around could work with the Legislature, however the state has changed in 30 years and not for the better. The Dems in the legislature have loyalty to the public employee unions not to Brown. The state has undergone a complete meltdown in its political system.
Also, the California GOP is largely responsible for its own plight, by trying to stick to a rigorous orthodoxy and becoming the party of state employees, just different state employees. The Republican Party in CA has been in a quasi-civil war for years, and with Arnold’s failure in office discrediting the moderates the conservatives have the upper hand for now in the party, but they’re solely content merely with preserving their safe seats and that’s enough for them. They had the opportunity to welcome the young people who registered Republican to vote for Ron Paul but they chose to reject them and spurn them, and thus are signing their death warrant. Since the GOP is bent on irrelevancy I hope that a third party can rise to the challenge and become California’s second party as one party rule is not good for anyone (including the party in power)
John McKanna
08.24.2012
So much for being “independant” with your biased bs article.