Third Parties’ Nominees Break The “Glass Ceiling”
By W. E. Messamore | 08/07/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, President | 17 Comments
Photo: alternet.org
Over the last couple election cycles in the United States, there has been much talk of a “glass ceiling” in US electoral politics that racial minorities and women have not been able to completely break through to higher US political offices such as the US Senate and the presidency. For the two biggest parties in America, it’s been mostly talk, but third parties are paving the way for women with female presidential candidates, and not just at the bottom of the ticket.
Neither the Republican nor Democratic parties have ever nominated a woman to run for president in the general election, and the two party system’s male nominees have only selected a female vice presidential running mate twice in US history, Geraldine Ferraro, who ran with Walter Mondale on a failed Democratic ticket in 1984, and Sarah Palin, who ran with John McCain on a failed Republican ticket in 2008.
There has been much speculation on the possibility of a surprise, Obama / Clinton ticket in 2012 to shake up a lethargic Democratic voter base, as well as the possibility of a Romney / Rice ticket to shake up a Republican voter base likewise short on enthusiasm. But this election cycle, more than one third party is breaking through the glass ceiling, and not just with a token female vice presidential pick, but with women at the top of the ticket, running for the number one spot in the US government’s executive branch.
The Green Party‘s ticket features both a female presidential and vice presidential candidate, with Massachusetts doctor Jill Stein in the number one spot and leading anti-poverty advocate Cheri Honkala heading up the bottom of the ticket as Stein’s running mate. In contention for the Green Party’s nomination was another woman, television actress Roseanne Barr, who moved on to secure the Peace and Freedom Party’s nomination after her failed bid for the Green Party’s nod. Her running mate is also a woman: prominent and controversial antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan.
That’s two third parties with tickets composed entirely of women in 2012, and female presidential candidates in third parties isn’t a recent phenomenon. In 2008, the Green Party nominated Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney and her running mate was community organizer Rosa Clemente. The conservative American Party nominated Diane Templin as its presidential candidate in 2008 as well, and her running mate was Linda Patterson. Templin was the American Party’s nominee in 2004 and 1996 as well. The Party for Socialism and Liberation also nominated a woman for president in 2008, Gloria La Riva.
In 1996, there were five female presidential candidates nominated by third parties. In 1992, there were four. In 1988 there were two. In 1984 there were two. In 1980 there were three. In 1976, the People’s Party nominated Los Angeles community organizer Margaret Wright for president on a platform of bringing the troops home from the war (in Vietnam), legalizing marijuana, and promoting gay rights. Further back in history, American third parties were still nominating women for president, even though the two main parties have yet to do so.
The very first female nominee for president was successful businesswoman and suffragist Victoria Woodhull, who ran for president in 1872 on the Equal Rights Party ticket at a time when women could not even vote in the United States. Though she won her party’s nomination, the government refused to print her name on ballots. Without having ever nominated a woman to run for president, could the two main parties really be over a century behind third parties when it comes to gender equality? As coveted a voting bloc as women are in the United States, the two main parties appear unwilling to nominate one for president. Perhaps female voters could send a message by declaring their independence and taking their votes with them.





Leave Your Comment →
17 Comments
Chad Peace
08.07.2012
@Chad_Peace
Very few women are going to vote third party because they have a female nominee. Unfortunately, although the third parties have elected female presidential nominees, there are very few “regular American females” that have any idea who they are. Most people don’t pay very much attention to politics. Fewer pay close enough attention to know who the third party nominees are. Even fewer consider the “statement” made by voting for a third party to be worth sacrificing a “meaningful” vote … if they choose to vote at all.
W. E. Messamore
08.07.2012
@W__E__Messamore
It’s definitely true that women won’t vote for a ticket just because a woman is on it– Sarah Palin’s ticket in 2008 trailed the Democratic ticket by a significant gap among women. And that’s definitely admirable if these voters are making it more about the issues than personality (and being male or female is more part of your personality than your issues and platform as a candidate). But it is very interesting, and I’d even use the word “odd” that the two parties haven’t nominated a female ever, even once in all of US history, while third parties are constantly doing it. That should pique everyone’s curiosity about third parties– it certainly did mine when I started researching for this article (which was originally just going to be about Stein and Barr until I learned that third parties have been doing this forever). Why is it that third parties nominate so many women while the main two never have? Third parties are clearly an entirely different animal from the two main ones, and here’s just one more example of why. A fact like this might interest some people in looking into them. You’re absolutely right that not many people are paying very close attention. Maybe this can get their attention.
Jon Drucks
08.08.2012
I am all for a Third Party. But, I think Gary Johnson has the best chance of winning – they should all unite behind Candidate that has best chance. Kind of like the Marijuana Initiatives – United we Stand, Divided we Fall.
Christopher Tuppo
08.08.2012
Jill Stein is smart and bold. It is easy to say that they have no chance at the White House. I think the Green Party’s choice for their ticket is pretty kick ass.
W. E. Messamore
08.08.2012
@W__E__Messamore
Agreed. IVN had a chance to interview her last year some time before she received the nomination, and I was extremely impressed by her. Third Party politics gets a– sometimes well-deserved– bad rap for nominating strange or unqualified candidates, but Dr. Jill Stein is top notch, a very credible candidate. It’s too bad if someone won’t take her seriously just because she has G next to her name instead of D or R.
Jaime Frausto Avila
08.08.2012
Green Party is a JOKE! If you’re gonna waste your vote, just write in Mighty Mouse. He has a better chance at getting elected!
W. E. Messamore
08.08.2012
@W__E__Messamore
Why do you think it’s a waste of a vote? What do you mean more specifically when you call the Green Party a joke?
Nick Tripoli
08.08.2012
I heart Jill Stein
Rock Tipton
08.08.2012
I`d vote for a turd on the sidewalk before I`d vote for either of the two party system`s rejects…
Ricky Gandhi
08.08.2012
what’s interesting about her is that she’s a doctor with a med degree from harvard med school. why i never heard of her until i took a fun little “which candidate do you most agree with quiz” (she was my second i believe) I’ll never know. Oh wait.. it’s cause of the damn media
Alex Zima
08.08.2012
Dump the same please political machine. Vote Green
W. E. Messamore
08.08.2012
@W__E__Messamore
The “same please political machine” <– I like this!
W. E. Messamore
08.08.2012
@W__E__Messamore
…not the machine, your name for it :-)
Todd Vickers
08.08.2012
@ Jeff & Jaime: the Green Party page is no place for your childishness. Share it on Rush Limbaugh’s page where it will be most welcome.
Stephen Bone
08.08.2012
This article conveniently neglects to mention the first woman to receive an Electoral College vote, even though she was on a third party ticket. She wasn’t a Left-winger though (not a Right-winger either). This type of selective memory may partly explain the media’s reputation for liberal bias.
Hon. J. Bonbright Anderson
08.08.2012
Ho!
Hon. J. Bonbright Anderson
08.08.2012
Hum!