Ron Paul Most Likely to Endorse Third Party Candidate
By Conor Murphy | 07/24/2012 | Elections 2012, Featured, President | 14 CommentsThis past Thursday, Rep. Ron Paul made an appearance on Fox Business and while most of the interview involved the Texas congressman’s coming retirement and his work on the Fed, he was asked whether or not he would vote for Mitt Romney. Congressman Paul said he had not yet made a decision on who he would vote for. No matter what Paul decides to do with his endorsement, it is unlikely to affect the outcome of the 2012 elections.
It is commonly known that Dr. Paul’s endorsement is very highly sought after. One of the reasons behind this is that he does not endorse other politicians very often. Very few politicians have the same record of stalwart consistency that Congressman Paul possesses, nor are there many politicians with such a devoted group of followers. For all of these reasons, political candidates around the country covet the doctor’s endorsement. What many of them don’t seem to realize is that even if Paul were to endorse someone like Mitt Romney, the endorsement would lose all of its intended effect.
Many of those who are calling on Paul to endorse Romney have a distorted understanding of Paul’s relationship to his followers. They believe that if Ron Paul says jump, his supporters will ask, “How high?” If they knew better, they might keep as far away from Ron Paul as lobbyists do. Dr. Paul has built his reputation on honesty, integrity, consistency, and principle. If he were to endorse Mitt Romney, a candidate whose own spokesman said he could change his views like an Etch a Sketch, Ron Paul would lose all of his credibility and his endorsement would no longer be worth anything to many of his supporters.
Just look at what happened when Ron Paul’s son, Senator Rand Paul, endorsed Romney last month. While the reasons behind his endorsement might be justifiable from a strategic point of view if he’s eying a presidential bid, a significant portion of the “liberty movement” turned its back on Rand, calling him a traitor to his principles. This is a strong indication that Paul supporters, while very appreciative of his honesty and his political views, are far from blind hero worshipers. If Dr. Paul were to shock the world and endorse Governor Romney, his followers would most likely leave him.
Even if a Paul endorsement could help the Romney campaign, the issue is moot because it’s just so implausible. Congressman Paul is set to retire at the end of his term in 2013. Throughout his entire public career going back to 1976, Paul has doggedly stuck to his principles, even if it it hurt his prospects of political advancement. This is one of the many reasons that his endorsements are so few and far between. The Romney campaign would also be hard pressed to find anything to offer Dr. Paul in return for his endorsement. Paul has absolutely no reason to sacrifice principle now when he’s so close to retirement and has nothing else to gain.
When all is said and done, if a Paul endorsement occurs at all, expect Congressman Paul to endorse a third party or independent candidate. There is already a precedent for this, and it is likely the only way Dr. Paul would be able to sleep at night.






Leave Your Comment →
14 Comments
Matt Metzner
07.24.2012
@mmetzner
I wouldn’t mind seeing him endorse Gary Johnson. I see some similarities between the two. It’s a tragic loss for all Americans seeing Dr. Paul retire, hopefully he will be equally as vocal and principaled following his last term.
Phil Mccanless
07.25.2012
@Phil Mccanless
I couldn’t imagine Dr Paul endorsing anyone other than Gary Johnson. The Obama/Romney ticket just means more of the same. Gary Johnson is the only supporter of liberty left in the race and he has the experience needed to carry it through.
mark edward marchiafava
07.25.2012
Wrong. A Ron Paul endorsement of anyone other than Mittens will SINK Mittens in the harbor, end of story.
Alden Wayne Dumas
07.26.2012
@Alden Wayne Dumas
Nothing wrong with sinking mittens, He’s just another Obama, different skin color is the only difference…..
BHO if not Ron
07.25.2012
If somehow Ron is not nominated for restoration, I’ll be voting for BHO for collapse. The free market will emerge either way.
Bayou Boogie
07.25.2012
@Bayou Boogie
Your assessment of a typical ‘Paulbot’ is correct (as I consider myself such a person). I had all but withdrawn from voting, politics, et al.,when I came upon Dr. Paul. I became and instant supporter and have fought for him now for the last 11 years. However, I would drop him like a 55 gallon drum if he endorsed Mitt Romney, a creature Dr. Paul has routinely exposed as the Statist, Neocon, Fascist he is. I never liked Rand since I felt (correctly so) that he was just another Statist. It appears I am right. I don’t think Rand does what he does for any kind of ‘strategy’ whereby he’s going to go along to get along, then spring some ‘Libertarian’ surprise once he gains any office and/or power. But, Ron would expose himself as a complete fraud by endorsing a man whose ideas and agendas fly in the face of everything Paul has stated he is about. Ron Paul would go down as a consumate traitor and make his following look like blithering idiots if he were to support Romney. And since Paul claims he’s still going to champion the ‘Freedom’ movement he started, that would effectively sink any such notions.
JohnJeremyVines
07.25.2012
I’m thinking Dr. Paul won’t endorse any Presidential candidate. This way neither his reputation nor his son’s future prospects are hurt.
Byte Jockey
07.25.2012
@Byte Jockey
I think Ron Paul may endorse Ron Paul and run as an independent.
He has my vote.
William Dalton
07.25.2012
Ron Paul could endorse the Republican ticket, with our without Mitt Romney, if the other running mate is a defender of the Liberty principles for which Dr. Paul has battled his entire career. Then there would be a reason to prefer a Republican victory, even with Romney on the ticket, to Obama’s reelection. But there is no indication Romney will do this, and none yet that the Convention will act independently of Romney. That is what makes the question of a Ron Paul endorsement of the Republican ticket a “moot point”.
Bayou Boogie
07.25.2012
@Bayou Boogie
Who else is there to carry the ‘Liberty’ message other than Ron Paul? And don’t say ‘Gary Johnson’ because he is NOT a ‘Ron Paul.’ Johnson says a lot of similar things, however he has been very timid as to his stances on War, Domestic Spying, Guantanamo, et al. These are areas he should be dead-on, blatantly clear about because they carry a great deal of other residual agendas. He strikes me as someone who really doesn’t disagree with the Establishment that much.
C.F. Arnold
07.25.2012
@C.F. Arnold
true Gary Johnson is not Ron Paul. Gary believes each individual has the right to marry whoever they choose, not that states have a right to choose who someone else marry’s. Gary Johnson believes a woman owns her own body, unlike Ron Paul who believes the states have the right to decide what a woman can do with her own body. Ron Paul is a social conservative. Gary Johnson is a social Libertarian.
Alden Wayne Dumas
07.26.2012
@Alden Wayne Dumas
IF RP doesn’t get the GOP nomination, I hope he would go 3rd party, RP would never endorse Mitt, that would be like endorsing Obama.
nm_lonewolf
07.29.2012
@nm_lonewolf-2
Well, RP may not give Gary his endorsement but let us not forget he has sought & received Gary’s in the past & Gary still thinks very highly of Ron. Gary has always had a genuine honesty who has also risked political suicide on many an occasion. I’m sold on Gary, not just because I’m New Mexican & know what Mr. Johnson brings to the table or that he’s an incredible athlete, no. I was sold the minute he thumbed his nose at the GOP for the treatment he received. Best thing the good gov could have done was to not waste time with them. So, if the dr. can ask for endorsments then I hope he can return them too.
Brandon M.
08.15.2012
Personally if he were to endorse anyone it should be Johnson, both of their ideals are the same and neither are bad people. It is truly sad that Rand has betrayed the Libertarian ideals.