Where do the Presidential Candidates Stand on Gun Control?
By Lauren Moore | 07/22/2012 | Elections 2012, Headline, President | 26 Comments
Take a look at past and present stance on the issue of gun control, for each of the four main presidential candidates.
President Barack Obama
Democrat
President Obama has been pretty quiet on the issue of gun control. From what he has said, he is pretty moderate calling for the traditional stronger background checks and better tracking of gun crimes to owners.
He was quoted in a Democratic Primary Debate in 2008:
“I think it’s important for us to recognize that we’ve got a tradition of handgun ownership and gun ownership generally. And a lot of law-abiding citizens use it for hunting, for sportsmanship, and for protecting their families. We also have a violence on the streets that is the result of illegal handgun usage. And so I think there is nothing wrong with a community saying we are going to take those illegal handguns off the streets. And cracking down on the various loopholes that exist in terms of background checks for children, the mentally ill. We can have reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respect the Second Amendment and people’s traditions.”
Despite the Associated Press’ claim that “Obama’s history in support of strict gun control measures prior to becoming president makes it difficult for him to claim he’s a Second Amendment champion, even though he signed a bill allowing people to take loaded guns into national parks,” continuing, “Gun control is a fight that the administration is not willing to pick. They’re not likely to win it.”
President Obama has also been quoted as saying: “As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can’t constrain the exercise of that right.”
It’s a carefully crafted statement leaving just enough wiggle room in his stance for the future, if he were to come out more forcefully on either side of the issue.
Mitt Romney
Republican
As of right now, Governor Romney is very clear on his support of the Second Amendment. In a taped message at the NRA’s ‘Celebration of American Values’ conference in 200,7 Romney said, “Let me speak very directly and candidly about where I stand. I support the Second Amendment as one of the most basic and fundamental rights of every American. It’s essential to our functioning as a free society, as are all the liberties enumerated in the Bill of Rights…”
Earlier in his career, however, he supported several gun control laws, such as the Brady Act.
Gary Johnson
Libertarian
In libertarian fashion, Garry Johnson believes the people have the right to decide what to do with guns.
He told Slate magazine in 2011, “I don’t believe there should be any restrictions when it comes to firearms. None.”
In a Playboy interview from 2000, he said: “If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. The first people who are going to be in line to turn in their guns are law-abiding citizens. Criminals are going to be left with guns. I believe that concealed carry is a way of reducing gun violence.”
Jill Stein
Green
Jill Stein strongly opposes an absolute right to own guns. When Jill Stein was asked in a 2011 On The Issues interview where she stands on gun control, the Green Party nominee replied, “It is more dangerous to the occupants of a home to have a gun than not. It’s more likely that you’ll be injured by your own gun than that you’ll be defended against some intruder with that gun. It’s an enormous public health problem in our cities–there are tragedies every day where young people are being shot, as victims of gun crimes. It’s tragic. We’re not arguing that nobody should have a gun–but public safety should factor into constraints.”





Leave Your Comment →
26 Comments
Bob Jackson
07.23.2012
Weapons of WAR don’t belong on the streets in Our Country! …….
Another_Patriot
08.05.2012
That’s why, if you did any research whatsoever, that weapons of WAR, selective-fire machine guns haven’t been available for civilian use ever since the Hughes Amendment in March of 1986. From then on, only LEO and Military may possess selective-fire machine guns (legally.). Don’t be foolish though. Go to your local hood and you’ll find a vast array of illegally modified weapons that criminals can purchase.
Bob Jackson
08.06.2012
So long as “gangland crime” is contained in the communities where gangs reside, it’s doubtful “the system” will be motivated to employ a “real assault” to reduce ‘That Crime Rate!’ With “Mass Murders,” that gets the publics’ attention (at least for the ‘moment or two’ it remains in the press.) So, let’s talk “Weapons Of War,” or weapons designed with the “Specific Purpose of Killing People.”
Over the last 30 Years there’s been 131 people murdered, in what’s referred to as “Mass Murders.” In those cases 53 (71%) of the murders were committed with Semi-Automatic Handguns 60 (46%) or Assault Weapons 33 (25%.) YOUR argument, having to do with “illegally modified weapons” ARE NOT what I would reference as “Weapons Of War.” So I will attempt to address the ” Unusual Direction” YOU’VE taken the argument.
“The Hood?” I suppose the implication is “the bloods” and “the crips” , were responsible for massacres in Aurora, CO, Ft. Hood, TX, Virginia Tech. Columbine, CO, Univ. of TX? The FACTS seem to indicate something more akin to “Members of the Klan” or “Residents of trailerparks” being the primary suspects in these type crimes. …….
Peter Duffy
07.23.2012
@Peter Duffy
Even an ardent Libertarian can recognize that a Constitutional right may be constrained by reasonable limitations.
Mewatis Montana
07.23.2012
Guns need only exist to protect or feed a family. The rest is all about show or to control.
Mewatis Montana
07.23.2012
Guns need only exist to protect or feed a family. The rest is all about show or to control.
Ryan Bernier
07.23.2012
They both stand on the fewest number of issues possible to broaden their appeal. Especially Willard.
Dennis Shaffner
07.23.2012
Puppets of NRA’s control of the do-nothing Congress
Paul Trovato
07.23.2012
I’m pro 2nd amendment rights.
Jimmy Rose
07.23.2012
9/11 was a gun free zone most came from Saudi Arabia where do they stand on that. Norwegian shooter was a wake up people need to carry there guns as a vet. I say all vet need to.
Clinton Chrisman
07.23.2012
Havent heard a real commitment from either one on where they stand on gun control. They will do some polls to see where the voters sit on this issue, then they will go with the popular public opinion to get the votes, no matter how they really feel.
Jeremiah Johnston
07.23.2012
they both want yours!
Doyle GaryJohnson Blaylock
07.23.2012
yes it will that’s why if Ron Paul isn’t the Republican Nominee, I’ll be voting Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party.
I will not support a Anti-Gun Romney. There is a list of things Romney has done that I don’t like but that’s one of the ones I can’t get over.
The 2nd Amendment protects the rest. If we lose our Guns we lose our Freedom.
Doyle GaryJohnson Blaylock
07.23.2012
Clinton, Obama is Anti-guns. Romney is Anti-guns (but tries to act like he’s pro-guns now that he’s running for president). His track record shows the truth though. Look at what he did in Massachusetts. Romney is no different than the majority of Democrats. He is a Sheep in Wolf’s clothing
Steven Ritter
07.23.2012
no, its about the economy, pure and simple
Ted Edwards
07.23.2012
The second amendment is clear we have the right to keep and eat bear arms
Johnny Ritchie
07.23.2012
No. Only conspiracies in some radicle right wingers minds.
Kevin Driscoll
07.23.2012
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com Gets my Vote
Vincent Lavarello
07.23.2012
they all take payolla from the NRA, I don’t own or need a gun as I have 5 German Shepards and numerous other self-defence items to protect my property, none of which involve gun-powder
Alden Huckvale
07.23.2012
–
Gary Johnson is the only candidate for POTUS who will protect your Second Amendment Rights, and also protect all of your other Constitutional Rights, which are just as important, but that you take for granted.
Jordan Reese
07.23.2012
We need guns
Manuel Flores
07.24.2012
@mannyflores
Only when incidents involving fire arms does the topic rise. It then is shoved under the carpet and nothing is ever done.
Phil Mccanless
07.25.2012
@Phil Mccanless
Gary Johnson has my vote!
Bob Jackson
07.25.2012
“A RESPECTFUL 2ND AMENDMENT DEFENDER “
o STRONG DEFENDER of the 2nd Amendment: “Right To Bear Arms”
o STRONG OBJECTIONS to “War Weaponry on the Streets Of America.”
o…..Armor-Piercing (“Cop Killer”) Ammunition
o…..Extended Capacity Bullet Clips
o…..Automatic Rifles / “Personal Machine Guns”
o…..Hand Grenades
o…..”Ground-To-Air Missiles”
o…..Gas Weapons
Monica Soucie
08.04.2012
There is no possible way to regulate gun control over criminals. They will get guns any way they can. Without the 2nd amendment we are opening ourselves up to governmental tyranny. Well armed citizens is our best defense against those that would like to change our way of life (ie the Muslim Brotherhood, the liberals and others).
Bob Jackson
08.04.2012
Monica Soucie, YOUR biggest Problem IS NOT who does, or doesn’t have the right to have guns. NOR is it who possesses or doesn’t possess guns. YOUR biggest Problem IS YOUR “Irrational Perception” of … “those that would like to change ANYONE’S way of life.” [?] …….