U.S. Behind in Requiring the Labeling of GMOs

image
Created: 05 Jul, 2012
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
2 min read

A recent IVN article, by contributor Ryan McLain, explains the current FDA guidelines on labeling the genetically modified foods (GMOs) that make it into our grocery stores. The senate failed to pass a bill last month that would have required the labeling of all GMOs by vote of 26 to 73. Unsurprisingly Monsanto, the world’s largest producer of genetically engineered seed, has in the past contributed to the campaigns of many of the Senators opposed to the bill through the company’s political action fund.

List of Monsanto’s political contributions January 2012 through June 2012.

Currently there are more than 40 industrialized countries which require the labeling of GMOs. Starting in January 2013, India will join the ranks of Australia, Japan, and the European Union in requiring GMO labeling. The United States is far behind the status quo even though multiple polls have shown that the majority of Americans are in favor of labeling.

In addition to enacting labeling laws, certain countries have placed outright bans on the planting of GMO crops. Ireland, Switzerland, New Zealand, Austria, Sri Lanka, Greece, Hungary and Bulgaria are among the countries where no GMO is permitted to take root. As of mid-2011 only three counties in the United States had successfully banned the planting of GMO crops. The counties are Mendocino, Trinity, and Marin, all in California. Other counties in the United States have attempted to sanction similar bans, but all have failed.

In November, Californians will be able to vote on the Right to Know initiative, which if it passes, will be the country’s first law requiring the labeling of a wide range of genetically modified food. The law would allow consumers the knowledge of which of their foods have had their DNA artificially altered.

Certain companies currently make it a point to label their products Non-GMO, in a self-initiated attempt to inform their consumers. The unregulated labeling practices have received some backlash however. A class action lawsuit filed against Pepsico owned Naked Juice accused the company of using GMOs in their Non-GMO labeled products.

Whether or not GMOs are a threat to public health or blight to the environment is still a point of heated debate between scientists, activists, and politicians. The fact is however, that consumers have the right to full disclosure about what they are buying and eating so they are able to make informed decisions.

More Choice for San Diego

Latest articles

Brick wall with a sign that says Republicans did it on the left, They did it in the middle, and Democrats did it on the right.
To Overcome Our Divides, We Must Try to Understand the Other Side’s Anger
After the election, I’ve been listening carefully to the people in our community. I’ve listened to Democratic voters distraught at Trump’s election, who can’t understand how so many people could vote for someone like him....
16 Jan, 2025
-
5 min read
Child holding up peace hand sign amidst rubble in Gaza.
Biden, Trump Quick to Take Credit for Gaza Ceasefire -- But Ignore Bigger Lesson
On Wednesday, both U.S. President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump took credit for a ceasefire-for-hostages agreement related to the conflict in Gaza. This deal, which had been in the works for several months, received additional support from an envoy associated with Trump, helping to facilitate its completion....
16 Jan, 2025
-
3 min read
hand sticking ballot in ballot box.
A 2024 Analysis Shows the Undeniable Force of the Independent Vote
Independent voters showcased how critical of a voting bloc they were in the 2024 elections. What's more, they showed that despite the claim that they are "party leaners," they were not committed to candidates of a single party....
15 Jan, 2025
-
3 min read