Skip to content
Subscribe

Supreme Court Ruling on Obamacare: A Contribution to Open Debate

Published:

Not in their wildest imaginations could pundits have predicted this outcome from the Supreme Court on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare). Those who did, could have made a lot of money with the long odds on this outcome. 5-4, yes, and even 5-4 to uphold Obamacare; Justice Anthony Kennedy was suspected to be the swing vote. But 5-4 upholding Obamacare with Chief Justice John Roberts joining Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor? Wow.

Was Chief Justice Roberts trying to protect the court from accusations of being activist or partisan? An elected Congress passed the law, Roberts wrote in his majority opinion, and it was entitled to “the full measure of deference owed to federal statutes.”

Many are describing this as a huge victory for President Obama. Washington Post writer Chris Cillizza said "For much of the past two years, Obama and Democrats have played defense on health care — losing the message war to Republicans on what the law will and won’t do. Now, Obama can use the Court decision as a jumping off point to take the offensive on all of the good things he believes were in the law that got glossed over in the political debate over it."

In a statement after the Supreme Court decision, Obama said "if you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance - this law will only make it more secure and more affordable." The president added that "Because of the Affordable Care Act, young adults under the age of 26 are able to stay on their parent's health care plans - a provision that's already helped 6 million young Americans. And because of the Affordable Care Act, seniors receive a discount on their prescription drugs - a discount that's already saved more than 5 million seniors on Medicare about $600 each."

The Supreme Court decision delivered a victory for the president, but will it make it easier for him to win in November? It serves as a reminder of legislation that was passed virtually entirely by Democrats against the objections of millions of Americans. Republicans used Obamacare as the core issue to their advantage in 2010, and they will certainly try to do the same this year. However, Republicans would be making a mistake if they think it will be enough to win by saying a newly elected GOP president (Mitt Romney) and Republican majorities in House and Senate will repeal Obamacare.

Affordability and accessibility to health care is a very important issue to most Americans. The question is has the passage of Obamacare resulted in more affordable health care? Will Obamacare deliver better quality and greater affordability? If not, what is a better alternative? Can we have Obamacare without creating more debt than the 15.8 trillion + we have currently, debt which exceeds the Gross Domestic Product? We need an open debate on how best to deliver health care that is more affordable, does not further increase our already too high national debt, and covers more Americans without sacrificing quality, and I think the Supreme Court decision greatly increases the likelihood of more open and substantive debate.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Supreme Court Ruling on Obamacare: A Contribution to Open Debate

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us