House Panel Holds AG Holder in Contempt on Fast and Furious
By Shawn M. Griffiths | 06/21/2012 | Safety | 23 CommentsThe House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, chaired by California Republican Darrell Issa, approved a resolution on Wednesday to hold U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. The measure came as a result of Holder’s refusal to fully comply with a subpoena in the congressional investigation of “Fast and Furious.”
The vote came after the Justice Department announced that the Obama administration had asserted executive privilege over certain documents in the gunwalking scandal. House Republicans were not going to be deterred by this. It didn’t take long for accusations of a cover-up to surface.
“The White House decision to invoke executive privilege implies that White House officials were either involved in the ‘Fast and Furious’ operation or the cover-up that followed,” Brendan Buck, spokesman for Speaker of the House John Boehner, said in a statement on Wednesday. “The Administration has always insisted that wasn’t the case. Were they lying, or are they now bending the law to hide the truth?”
White House Communications Director, Dan Pfeiffer, responded by saying the House GOP is more concerned with putting on political theater than addressing the needs of the American people and the middle class, adding we are less than two weeks away from transportation funding expiring and student loan rates doubling if Congress doesn’t act on either issue.
Many people don’t understand why the President invoked executive privilege over information pertaining to the investigation of the botched ATF gunrunning operation known as “Fast and Furious.” Both Attorney General Holder and the White House have already stated the administration was not directly involved in “Fast and Furious” and has no previous knowledge of these documents.
The information in question could help shed some light on how the Justice Department lost track of roughly 2,000 registered guns allowed across the Mexican border and into the possession of drug cartels. Dozens of Mexican nationals have been killed with these weapons. U.S. Border Agent Brian Terry was killed in Arizona by suspected cartel members and guns which were allowed to be smuggled into Mexico were found near him. The bullet that killed him was too damaged to determine which weapon it came from.
While the White House has not offered a real explanation on why executive privilege was asserted, some political analysts suggest that the Obama administration wants a legal battle with House Republicans. It is an opportunity to portray congressional GOP as extremists more interested in winning elections than creating jobs and helping the economy.
The measure to cite the highest law enforcement officer in the United States with contempt was pushed through the Oversight Committee with a party-lined vote of 23-17 after Republicans easily defeated several Democratic amendments.
Democrats accused Chairman Issa and his Republican colleagues of orchestrating a “witch hunt” with the sole purpose of scoring political points in an election year. Republicans, in turn, accused Democrats of ignoring the facts and distracting from the investigation.
The approval of the contempt citation sets up a major legal battle between Congress and the President. Speaker Boehner was quick to announce that the measure will be brought before the House floor next week. The resolution is likely to pass under the Republican majority.
The actions taken by the White House have raised many eyebrows, and forced the investigation into the national spotlight. Republicans point their fingers and cry, “Coverup!” Democrats return the gesture and accuse the GOP of playing partisan politics. Some Americans are finding out about “Fast and Furious” for the first time this week and still don’t fully know what the investigation is about.
In an election year, partisan lines have never looked thicker and the investigation into “Fast and Furious” has become a partisan issue that both sides see as a winning opportunity for November. Meanwhile, the family of Brian Terry wants more answers than they are getting, but they are far from getting such closure.
This is political theater, but both sides have made it so. The White House set the stage by asserting executive privilege, House Republicans raised the curtain, and “Act One” is in progress.






Leave Your Comment →
23 Comments
Chad Peace
06.21.2012
@Chad_Peace
How many times did the Bush administration refuse to disclose information out of “National Security” concerns. Doesn’t make it right on either side … just shows these parties are only concerned about the game … they forgot that the role of government is to be the referee.
Dennis Shaffner
06.22.2012
Contras, Nancy?
Maria Soledad Rujano Calef
06.22.2012
but why Rep were deterrent whyn Alberto Gonzales refused to answer question to Congress?
Dusty Studebaker
06.22.2012
It’s high time we put National priorities before Party priorities. Sometimes the best-laid plans go wrong. And both parties know this. They should ALL stop bickering about trivial matters and get back to working on what is truly important – the greater good for our Nation.
Lance Willis
06.22.2012
Alberto quit ……..
Bill Rogers
06.22.2012
The contempt charges are a total side show. Fast and Furious was a bad program (but its roots go back to the Bush administration). Eric Holder stopped the program. What more do people want? If we want to do something to honor the memory of the Brian Terry why don’t we focus on trying to get guns off of the border regardless of how they go there?
Lance Willis
06.22.2012
Turn over the docs
Lance Willis
06.22.2012
Then we all will know…who did what
Patrick Kiff
06.22.2012
I believe what happened during fast and furious is important to this nation. It’s also important for families of murdered victims on both sides of the border and for the sake of our constitutional second amendment.
Patrick Kiff
06.22.2012
Right from the horses moth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypAU28t5Ya0
Susan Jefferson
06.22.2012
This is NOT an election time issue. The investigation has been in progress and stonewalled by Holder for over a year. It was President Obama who himself said that Fast and Furious would be investigated and that Eric Holder would be assigning an Inspector General to investigate it. Now that evidence has been uncovered of Holder’s involvement … they want it all to go away.
Susan Jefferson
06.22.2012
Here is President Obama in March of 2011 in an interview with the Hispanic news station Univision discussion the gun running and saying that they will find out who did this and hold them accountable.
Susan Jefferson
06.22.2012
The problem is not only were people killed by these guns, but also, by not informing President Calderon of the operation, they were breaking international laws. Here is the transcript of the interview for those who do not like opening links:
RAMOS: The Mexican government complains that they were not informed about the fast and furious operation. Did you authorize this operation and was President Calderon properly informed about it?
OBAMA: Well, first of all I did not authorize it. Eric Holder, the Attorney General did not authorize it. He’s been very clear that our policy is to catch gun runners and to put them into jail. So, what he’s done is he’s assigned an IG (inspector general) to investigate what exactly happened here.
RAMOS: Who authorized it?
OBAMA: Well, we don’t have all the facts. That’s why the IG is in business … to collect the facts.
RAMOS: You were not even informed about it?
OBAMA: Absolutely not. This is a pretty big government … you know … the United States government. I’ve got a lot of moving parts. But, I want to be very clear. I spoke to President Calderon when he came to visit just a few weeks ago.
Our policy is to ramp up the interdiction of guns flowing south, because that’s contributing to some of the security problems that are taking place in Mexico. And, what we’re doing is trying to build the kind of cooperation between Mexico and the United States that we haven’t seen before that ensures that we have a comprehensive approach.
I’ve said to President Calderon and I’ve said publicly, we’ve got obligations. It’s not just Mexico’s problem. It’s also our problem. We’ve got to reduce demands for drugs, which is why, even though we’ve got obviously significant deficits, we’re allocating 10 billion dollars in our budget to try to reduce demand through prevention programs and education programs.
We have to make sure that we’re enforcing the kinds of measures that will stop the flow of guns and cash down south that is helping to fuel these transnational drug cartels. So, we’ve initiated excellent cooperation.
There may be a situation here in which a serious mistake was made. If that’s the case, then we’ll find out and we’ll hold somebody accountable.
RAMOS: Mexico was not informed, then?
OBAMA: Well, if I wasn’t informed, I assure you that Mexico wasn’t informed.
Nancy Benhardus
06.22.2012
I don’t see it as partisanship when we are looking for accountability for lives lost. This is outrageous on any level. Is your bias showing???
Lance Willis
06.22.2012
No bias…..who did what….
Rodolfo Villasenor
06.22.2012
This whole contempt issue is bi-partisan. Gonzales, and every president from the 1981 to the present have been in contempt of Congress. Please!
Lance Willis
06.22.2012
Again……. Put all the docs on the table…..all questions will be answered…..
End of drama…
Ted Edwards
06.22.2012
I see no conflict with congress. congress can go about there tasks that need to be taken careof and the oversight commity can HAMMER holder for the wrongs he and his cohorts are guiilty of
Dan Richards
06.23.2012
@danrich
If we let the line of; “It Bush’s fault” run, then you have to look at every thing during the past four years was Bush’s fault, even things he had no dealing with and Obama screwed up. This excuse for a man has no responsibility of anything, nor any adeptness to him.
I don’t know who did what, but believing this dunce had no knowledge of it, would be falling for another lie. It is plane and simple here that he and Holder have a lot to hide, so the question is what?
I this action should put Obama on notice of releasing this information, and making sure it all is released, or he will be filed on as sedition.
NizarandSoraia Jiwa
06.24.2012
C’mon folks, Holder lied about knowing the program existed. He made several false statements then recanted. Now executive privalege is blocking documents from showing that the weapon was not only on the scene, but may have been the actual weapon that shot Officer Terry. This is crystal clear and anyone calling this a political witch hunt is blocking, tackling and spinning for the Obama administration.
Brad R. Schlesinger
06.24.2012
@bradschlesinger
This certainly is political theatre, but that aside, this whole thing just shows the total incompetence of Holder and the Justice Department. The fact that only the head of the ATF and one US Attorney in Arizona have lost their job is a classic example of government’s inability to achieve anything close to accountability for a major, major disaster.
Samuel Crook
06.25.2012
these republicans are like a satanic greek choir.
Patrick
06.26.2012
If it is political theater it is only so because Holder refuses to turn over documents for fear of “damage” when the death of people are being investigated by a body charged with governmental oversight. Both Democrats and Republicans will soon be on to the next thing after Holder is charged with contempt and it moves towards prosecution which will now include Obama’s use of executive privledge. If Democrats are stringing this out because they feel they can use it against Republicans I think they are making a huge mistake. When most americans are aware of the circumstances behind the theater they will feel like democrats are hiding something.