Marco Rubio Gives Troubling Foreign Policy Speech at Religious Conference
By Carl Wicklander | 06/17/2012 | Legislators, News, War and Foreign Policy | 12 CommentsAn intriguing figure, Senator Marco Rubio has been the subject of speculation and the object of grassroots Republican affection for at least two years. Even though he had only previously served in the Florida state legislature, Rubio was immediately hailed as a national Tea Party icon.
But Rubio is not a harbinger of a new conservative future. He is a man of the past, a figure of the status quo, and his speech at last Thursday’s Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference indicates that he is a new face for the old guard of the GOP.
Although very well received, Rubio’s speech wasn’t much more than typical campaign red meat for activists. Filled with statements about “blessings” from God, Rubio didn’t do much to push the envelope. Such is par for the course, but the speech was also one of a determined, albeit confused ideologue.
Speaking about setting good examples, Rubio said:
“Those of us who look to our faith and particularly look to early Christian history to remind ourselves that Christianity spread not so much only because of the preaching but because of the way these people lived. Early Christians were subjected to extraordinary torture, extraordinary oppression. . . . And yet early Christians endured all of this with a sense of peace and of happiness that inspired those around them to inquire, ‘Well, what is it about them that is so different? What’s the source of this peace and the tranquility that they have in their lives?’ . . . I say that only to remind us that it’s the American example that has inspired the world as much as anything else.”
At first glance, such a statement looks like a traditional understanding of “American Exceptionalism” and “A Shining City on a Hill,” and seems to channel St. Francis’ oft-cited axiom, “Preach the gospel at all times– if necessary use words.”
But Rubio seems hopelessly confused– apparently equating America’s secular political system with religious faith. Yet when he really gets down to it, Rubio isn’t really advocating good examples. To get what Rubio is proposing means imposing those examples on others with force. The speech crescendos:
“For those of us who share the Christian faith we know the Parable of the Talents. . . . Today I want to talk about how it applies to us. Because just like the people are held accountable individually we’ll also be held accountable in our role as Americans. All of us, at the end of our lives, our faith teaches, will be held accountable for what we did. . . .
“[Did we uphold our blessings as Americans by] standing for the cause of liberty and freedom because we know that liberty and freedom is not just an American principle. It is a faith-based principle that applies to all mankind. What did you do? What did you do, America? Did you think this was just about enjoying your time and having the most fun that you could or did you realize that with your blessings came a special obligation to continue through your example to inspire the world . . .
“And now we’re asked to do what every generation before us has had to do: decide whether we’ll use these blessings or take them for ourselves. Because we’re not just blessed so we can have. We’re blessed so we can give. And the greatest thing that we can give the world is the American example. The greatest thing that we can give the world is an America that is as great as she has ever been and even greater and there’s no reason why that can’t happen. The promise of this new century is real. . . .
“Because what’s truly at stake in 2012 and in the years to come is not just which party controls Washington or which leader lives in the White House. What’s at stake is our very identity. There is no reason why the 21st century can’t be an American Century as well for more people and more places than ever before. The only thing standing between a new American Century and today is our willingness to do what it takes to get there.” [emphases mine -- CW]
Not only does Rubio not understand the Parable of the Talents and think Americans will stand before a judge over their American righteousness, but his use of the word “example” is simply devious.
When he speaks of an “American Century” he is appropriating the language coined in Henry Luce’s 1941 Life magazine article to describe how the United States was going to be the pre-eminent world power even before the U.S. entered World War II. And the “American Century” was one that included coups and aggressive wars to implant compliant pr0-American governments so there was very little that could be construed as “examples.”
And by talking about an “American Century for more people and more places than ever before” he is also adopting the attitude of William McKinley to justify the Spanish-American War to “Christianize our little brown brothers.” Marco Rubio may stand for a number of things, but a break with the past is not one of them.
To be fair, Rubio said more than can be discussed here, but the crux of Rubio’s speech is that by virtue of her institutions, America has a divine right to rule over a world of six billion. Although he continually uses the word “example,” Rubio is deceiving his audience and perhaps even himself because the vision he has and the model he wishes to follow is inseparable from an expansive foreign policy of aggression and force, not example.
And by encompassing his vision in a religious framework, he may be one of the most dangerous ideologues of all: one who believes his work is sanctioned by the Almighty.






Leave Your Comment →
12 Comments
Brad R. Schlesinger
06.17.2012
@bradschlesinger
Yes, lets show the world the American example by bombing other countries unprovoked, drone striking militants who are now defined as any male of military age, creating instability in foreign countries, while killing untold numbers of innocent civilians — all in the name of Rubio style American awesomeness. And people wonder why there are those who wish to bring violence to America. The “terrorists” don’t hate us for our freedom, they hate us for what we do to their countries and homes. We know this because they explicitly say it — it’s just not convenient for our politicians to admit it.
Sid Harth
06.17.2012
My Dear Carl Wicklander,
I am Sid Harth.
Not that your observation about a likely candidate for the GOP 2012, vice president is wrong, not that he says pretty much what has become a Tea Party chant, not that he and Mitt, joined together at hips, have less a chance to win against Barack Obama, not that it matters to me.
Why are you so upset over bunch of words?
He is speaking to get Sarah Palin’s attention, not Mitt’s. The story is that against Mitt’s first opinion, the second opinion is proving right. People get attention because they say bad things. Not good things. Marco Polo-Player in Florida’s panhandle, is as green, as inane, as without any qualms about his political philosophy as, say Barry Goldwater.
Barry was buried, I think. So will be Marco Polo, a Latino trying to find a silk road to China, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, Africa continent, Canada, Mexico, Europe, Middle East, Far East, Putin’s Russia, Panama, South America, Greenland, Grassland and Dreamland, his own kind.
Peace.
…and I am Sid [email protected]
Douglas B Adams
06.17.2012
This man refused to be vetted by the tea party he purports to lead.He is and always has been a big government Hamiltonian with out the grace of knowing lincoln was a tyrant.Just as he would be if allowed . this fraud needs to be sent home where watchful eyes can keep him in check.
John Vasilakis
06.17.2012
The man is a complete psychopath. Just another neocon warmonger who feels the US should force their will on other countries. The disturbing thing is, he is discussing liberty. An authoritarian statist talking about liberty. He wouldn’t know liberty if Ron Paul smacked him upside the head with the US Constitution.
Mark Unruh Sr.
06.17.2012
I gotta unlike or un-friend this stupid page. Too many freaks
Daniel Pascoe
06.17.2012
You tools got his message all wrong and you’re twisting his words. He is not advicating we attack the world with rightous anger he is calling on idividuals to step up to the plate and be good Christians to help change the world throught the spreading of the message of Christ on an idividual basis, not attack the world.
I”m glad real independants can see through this sites garbage.
Jason Pratt
06.18.2012
hate it when people bring religion into politics …. separation of church and state, ring a bell? I’m an athies
Jason Pratt
06.18.2012
does that make me a bad person??? i live by the golden rule – don’t need to be Christian to ytrat people how i would want to be treated. get off your religious beliefs people. polotics are whats best for a country, not what’s best for a religous group!
Ali
06.18.2012
Wow! Talk about everyone hearing something different in a speech.
I heard a man speak about faith. Faith in God and faith in the Godly
principles on which the United States was founded. I heard a message
of hope, encouragement, and endurance. The United States has been
a beacon to all people of all nations because of the freedoms that we
have. Whether you like what he said or not, he did speak the truth.
He is right–each one of us will give an account individually of what we did or did not
do with our lives. The first account will be for who we have chosen to serve; the second for what we did with the opportunities we had .
Also, someone hates bringing religiion into politics? I truly do not know anyone who is able to keep their religious beliefs (pro-religious or anti-religious) out of politics.
What we do or do not belief affects everything we do or do not do.
Furthermore, for those who are not believers in God and Jesus Christ, in death
the answer will be indisputable. If I am incorrect, I will enter nothingness and not
even know or regret it. On the other hand, if the non-believer’s “faith” that he will enter nothingness is incorrect, he’ll have an eternity with other like-minded individuals
and that surely will be hell when you consider the who’s who that includes.
We have the “freedom” to choose who and what we believe. Choose carefully!)
Craig D. Schlesinger
06.18.2012
@craigschlesinger
With this divine right, pro-Christendom rhetoric, Marco Rubio is merely picking up where Rick Santorum left off. I’ll tell Rubio what I’ve told Santorum: Just run for Holy Roman Emperor.
Marco, you may find the College of Cardinals more receptive (so long as you don’t forget to blackmail and bribe the Curia) than the American electorate. Then you can reconquer the New World and remake America in your image. We’ll have an “American Century” alright, just like the good ole days of the 1550′s.
Greg Kiff
06.23.2012
I don’t like him or rummny.
Justin Buell
06.23.2012
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!!!