Rand Paul Says Endorsement of Romney Doesn’t Change His Independent Stance on Issues
By Peter Barbour | 06/15/2012 | Activism, Elections 2012, Movements, President | 26 CommentsSenator Rand Paul (R-KY) had to know his endorsement of former MA Governor and presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney for president would upset many supporters of the Senator’s father, TX Congressman and GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul. And sure enough, it has upset a lot of the Ron Paul supporters. But does the endorsement reveal a change of philosophy or of positions on the issues? Senator Paul says it does not.
“My participating and saying that I will support the nominee doesn’t change me at all or any of the issues that I’m fighting for, but it does change the ability of us, or the liberty movement, to have a voice in what becomes here. We have the ability to have more say and more influence by saying that we will ultimately support the nominee.”
If Ron Paul is unhappy or in any way disappointed with his son’s endorsement of Romney, he is not admitting it. In fact, the Texas Congressman penned an open letter recently to his supporters and had a message for supporters who will be at the Republican convention in Tampa Bay, Florida from 8/27-8/30: be respectful. “Our delegates’ presence must be felt both in Tampa and in years to come,” Paul wrote. “Stand up for what we believe in. Be respectful. And let the establishment know that we are the future of the Party and of the country.”
I wrote about former Congressman and Obama supporter Artur Davis (D-AL) and his departure from the Democrats a couple weeks ago. The Davis announcement that his next run would be as a Republican was an embarrassment to President Obama. But the Democrats aren’t the only ones dealing with loss of support or a split. There may not be any Republicans in Congress prepared to leave the GOP or run next time as a Democrat, but there is a split in the GOP. And while Senator Rand Paul’s endorsement is definitely welcomed by the Romney campaign, it does not heal the split. What split? A split between Republicans who favor current foreign policy and security measures (i.e. War on Terror, Patriot Act, NDAA) and big government and those who oppose it; Ron Paul and his son are a part of the latter, smaller group of Republicans.
The problem for those of us who believe in limited government as the key to liberty, reduced debt, and economic prosperity is a simple one: many are outside of the GOP and reside in 3rd parties, primarily the Libertarian Party. For instance current Libertarian candidate for president, Gary Johnson said last year “I’m a Libertarian in belief. I successfully governed as a Libertarian in everything but the name, and I am running for president as a Libertarian.” But Johnson used to be a Republican when he was Governor of New Mexico. And therein lies the problem.
The question is will those of us who believe in liberty have more influence inside or outside the 2 major parties? I for one think we will have more influence within the 2 major parties. Ron Paul tried running as a Libertarian and got very little support; I suspect Johnson will suffer the same fate in 2012. Leaving the GOP does not advance liberty; indeed I think the best chance for liberty to advance is for more Libertarian leaning people like Johnson to return to the GOP. That’s what Ron Paul did.
To those who say Rand Paul sold out by endorsing Romney, has the senator changed his views on issues since he made the endorsement? If Sen. Paul refused to endorse Romney, what chance would he have to get support for a future Rand Paul for president run or a return to the Senate? Of course, many Republicans would likely never support Senator Paul if he ran for president. But it would be much tougher for those who disagree with him on the issues to go after Senator Paul too viciously, considering his endorsement of Romney. The GOP is hypocritical on matters of liberty; you cannot support laws which erode liberty like the Patriot Act and NDAA, and you cannot support giving unlimited power to government to tax and spend and call yourself a pro-liberty party.






Leave Your Comment →
26 Comments
Dan
06.15.2012
[ My participating and saying that I will support the nominee doesn’t change me at all or any of the issues that I’m fighting for..] Cannot have it both ways Flip-floper..Traitor.
Matt Metzner
06.15.2012
@mmetzner
You’re right on with the difficulty finding support without a party name and a libertarian cause. Hopefully these ideals are the future of the GOP.
Pete Barbour
06.15.2012
Matt, let’s hope so. Better chance for more liberty if we fight for it within in the GOP in my opinion.
Ben Maurer
06.15.2012
of course not! why should ANYONE believe a politician
Lynn Cardarelli
06.15.2012
Yes, I do believe Rand Paul.
Amanda L Arteno
06.15.2012
yes, I believe him and I will continue to watch how he votes and if he advances the cause of liberty and judge him that way.
Pete Barbour
06.15.2012
As will I, Amanda. Let’s see what positive impact, if any, this has on advancing liberty.
Hayde Johnoff
06.15.2012
NO!!!!
Alvin Johnson
06.15.2012
I believe he is going with the odds. At best his dad will be a third party candidate. Which further diminishes any chance Ron has of being President.
Cullen Maslanka
06.15.2012
Whatever…tool.
Shannon Cooper
06.15.2012
Well Ron paul would be best president
Mike Anderson
06.15.2012
He will end up being a corporate tool like the rest of them
Donald Hale
06.15.2012
NO!
Lucas Eaves
06.15.2012
@lucaseaves
I think that in the current situation with overwhelming control the two parties have over the american political life, being within the party system is the only way to have access to significant positions that will allow a politician to influence the countries policies.
Brandon Magoon
06.15.2012
No! A vote for Romney is a vote for Obama.
Pete Barbour
06.15.2012
Brandon, if the GOP thinks that an endorsement from even Ron Paul will gain most of his supporters for Romney, I think they are mistaken. Issues/actions matter, not endorsements or words. Only a genuine change on liberty issues (i.e. vote to repeal NDAA and Patriot Act, push to abolish income tax/IRS, etc.) will get the attention of voters who support Dr. Paul. My point, and many who support Dr. Paul disagree with me on this, is we have a better chance of gaining ground on liberty issues by fighting for it within the major parties, not on the outside.
Ray Davis
06.15.2012
he moved his lips,he lies
Rebecca Wright
06.15.2012
I want to. Going to be watching his voting.
Aidan King
06.15.2012
At first glance I just think it’s typical party politics. Rand Paul has never been part of the Libertarian Party. And the Republicans want to beat Obama
Laurel Hendricks
06.15.2012
I always had the gut feeling that he was slime…..and he has shown his true colors……I only hope that what he sold out for was really worth it in his mind, because I will never back him.
Pete Barbour
06.15.2012
Laurel, I respectfully disagree with you. I know a lot of people are upset with the endorsement, but I maintain that those of us who value liberty have a better chance of moving Congress in a pro-liberty direction by remaining in one of the 2 major parties. Not endorsing Romney would greatly diminish Sen Paul’s influence. And Ron Paul has certanly gained more influence by returnng to the GOP. For example, GOP leadership in the House of Representatives recently announced that legislation to thoroughly audit the secretive Federal Reserve, one of Dr. Paul’s top priorities, will come up for a floor vote in July (see http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/11527-house-to-vote-on-ron-paul-bill-to-audit-the-federal-reserve). Let’s see if Rand Paul’s endorsement will have a positive effect, negative effect or no effect at all on where Romney/GOP stand on liberty issues. It may not have any effect, but time will tell.
Jo Shortreed
06.15.2012
I agree with Rand Paul, I like to think of myself as an Independent Republican.
Maria C. Mitchell
06.16.2012
He is not a traitor and he isn’t going “with the odds” – he’s endorsing the likely nominee that won his state of KY. He was sent to represent the people and not himself.
Maria C. Mitchell
06.16.2012
David J. Poetter
06.18.2012
His RECORD in office tells me that I can trust Rand Paul.
So, he endorsed Romney? Oh well. Last I checked, a member of a political party endorsing another member from the same party is pretty much par for the course.
The truth is that we do not have ANYONE in the Senate who’s as reliable and dependable fighting for liberty as Rand Paul. Some are ok on some issues, but NOBODY has Rand’s record in office right now.
Pat Powers
06.23.2012
Does Rand have a perm?@