Why Scott Walker Won
By AJ Segneri | 06/06/2012 | Elections 2012, State Office, States | 9 CommentsWhat we witnessed in Wisconsin yesterday something that extraordinary from my perspective as political strategist. People are wondering why Gov. Scott Walker won the election and avoided a recall. We have heard and seen so many people protesting Walker’s administration for over a year. So how come Gov. Walker won? From my perspective, it happened in the following areas.
Too Much Hate
If you looked at the commercials, and the people going into communities to recall Gov. Walker, you will note that there was more hating Walker, rather than looking at the issues. Everything about this recall campaign was disliking Walker at the surface level. This will counteract the purpose of getting a message across, and will result in people voting for the opposite person because they are rejecting the negativity and vitriol.
Relying On Two Counties
The recall campaign focused efforts too narrowly on Dane and Milwaukee Counties. Though campaign pushes were held elsewhere as well, the main focus was mostly on Dane County, home of Madison, and Milwaukee County, home of Milwaukee. The media mostly focused on showing the outrage of those in Dane County, where the capitol is located. Milwaukee is another area that generally trends Democratic, although the the Milwaukee North Shore is highly Republican. McCain carried the North Shore area, or 5th Congressional District, at 95% in 2008. The Northwoods, the collar counties around Milwaukee County, and the western side of Wisconsin, ended up helping Walker. These areas are Republican counties that Walker also carried in the 2010 election. Both counties make up 45% of the state’s income.
Weak Democratic Candidate
I will be blunt. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett is a weak candidate for Governor. During my time in Milwaukee, I’ve had the opportunity to see Barrett in action, and yes he is a charismatic man that speaks well and looks good on camera. But Barrett does not speak to certain state issues, such as environment and rural economy. Barrett is the mayor of Milwaukee, and as such he knows hyper-local issues, despite the fact he served on the Wisconsin General Assembly, Wisconsin State Senator, and was a Congressman in the 5th District. All of the races he was in previously, were in areas that he knew only in the Milwaukee area. How could Barrett speak to a farm family in Virquoa? Or the Schlitz family logging company in Tomahawk? All that Barrett could promise during the recall campaign is that he was not Walker. That’s it? There has to be more.
Reflecting on what caused this defeat for opponents of Gov. Scott Walker, it is easy to blame outside forces. We can point to the fact Walker outspent Barrett, as well as this was yet another showing of the Tea Party. Those things are true, but you also have to look at what did the campaign do in order to cause this recall in favor of Gov. Walker, too.






Leave Your Comment →
9 Comments
Dan Richards
06.06.2012
@danrich
If you look at Walker’s firs action after winning the recall election, this also shows an aspect that is not seen in many Politicians today. His first action was to start working on a luncheon to get the politicians in the State Government together where they could talk things out. The Hamburger and brat lunch he is planning. This is a low pressure grouping where issues can be talked out in a less pensive environment.
Now if done right, and all sides at least try to work together, this has a potential to reduce a lot of the stress there, and as he said, help get everyone working together.
I don’t think this was as much about the Tea Party, as it was the Unions on a down slide because of their greed. In this economy a lot of cuts have to be made, and in so many cases the Unions are pushing members to resist them, as so the Unions can keep making the large amount they make off their members sweat and blood. It is in no way to benefit their members. In other words, I do believe Walker won due to common sense, rather any party.
Joseph Hewitt
06.07.2012
Good analysis. I thought they put up a week opponent as well.
askmieke
06.07.2012
I think you’re wrong to look at the campaign only to determine why Walker won. Perhaps the people of Wisconsin can see the results of the reforms he’s making and … agree with him!
Dan Richards
06.07.2012
@danrich
I agree. I do not believe it is any one thing, but a number of them that lead up to this point that all came to a head, and Walker was the only one making the right moves, or at least enough of them.
bob jackson
06.07.2012
@bobj72
Let’s be clear here! First, Walker misled the people of Wisconsin by not acknowledging his intent to attack “collective bargaining” during his initial campaign for Governor. If he had admitted his intention (“paid for” agenda) it’s highly doublful he would have prevailed.
Secondly, the ‘faux’ KOCH Brother phone call provides Walker’s motivation to “serve interests other than the people of Wisconsin.”
Thirdly, Walker’s “7 – to – 1 Money Advantage” (largely from “Outside Money Interests”) ACTUALLY brought Walker to 1% (percent,) plus maybe a fraction more votes than he garnered in the original election. …….
D'Marie Mulattieri
06.07.2012
I can’t believe this article left out the most important reason. $$$$ Scott Walker outspent Tom Barrett ten times over!!! The political ads that the Walker campaign aimed at the rural communities were outright lies! The whole recall made a mockery of political democracy and highlighted the need to get money out of politics!
AJ Segneri
06.07.2012
@ajsegneri
D’Marie, you are right that Walker outspent Barrett 8 to 1. I did not mention that, because that is a known thing. I just pointed things that I saw when I observed the recall campaign.
Bob Jackson
06.09.2012
“AJ”; It would be commonplace for anyone on the “Fright-Right” to overlook the “Greatest Contributing Factor” for a “Bought Governor” OVERCOMING A MANDATED RECALL! …….
D'Marie Mulattieri
06.07.2012
I can’t believe this article left out the most important reason. $$$$ Scott Walker outspent Tom Barrett ten times over!!! The political ads that the Walker campaign aimed at the rural communities were outright lies! The whole recall made a mockery of political democracy and highlighted the need to get money out of politics!